Perrymeister

Perrymeister — CS2 Stats

DE76561198118664245[U:1:158398517]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,983Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,429Hours in CS33Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,021Top 50% of 211,827 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#98463 of 258937 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,021 +3,024 7 Aug – 28 Oct · 31 days played
15,00019,021peak 19,0217 Aug28 Oct
19,021Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-08-07

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,021
  • +3,018 over 30 days · improving
  • +3,024 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 979 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate52.2%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy12.5%12.4%12.7%meets
Kill/death ratio1.001.031.050.05 short
Match win rate42.0%45.2%45.7%3.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPerrymeisterFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,021 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning50
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateWWWWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.2pp headshot accuracy · −69ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility7.0
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.83 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.0
Utility7.0
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time564ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–1 · nuke, 18 Oct →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · nuke, 16 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · cache, 15 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 18 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W4Current streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 12ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3015–1550%-0.01
anubisA1810–856%-0.01
cacheA169–756%-0.02
infernoS129–375%0.02
nukeB115–645%0.00
ancientD72–529%-0.02
mirageS64–267%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

178,405Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
7,776Matches
42.0%Match win rate
52.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 6 players
12.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
18,710MVPs
3,763Hours (in match)
10,446Bombs planted
1,827Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4750,671
AWP22,432
P2505,669
Tec-93,669
FAMAS2,715

Lifetime map wins

28,839dust2
11,748inferno
2,938nuke
2,374cbble
1,607train
1,390vertigo
37office
31safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
560msReaction time
32.6%T opening success
50.8%CT opening success
0.83Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
10.56HE damage / grenade
8.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.63% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–40.0013%28 Oct →
nuke13–80.0611%28 Oct →
cache13–30.0025%28 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0120%26 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0031%25 Oct →
ancient13–80.0214%25 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0618%24 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0414%24 Oct →
dust216–140.0218%23 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0417%23 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0132%23 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.075%23 Oct →
anubis13–5-0.0516%23 Oct →
inferno13–50.0324%23 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0418%22 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0120%20 Oct →
mirage13–80.0423%20 Oct →
cache14–160.0114%19 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0822%19 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0326%18 Oct →
inferno13–30.0323%18 Oct →
nuke13–10.1734%18 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0343%17 Oct →
ancient13–70.0511%17 Oct →
inferno13–30.1215%17 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0335%16 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0725%16 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0444%16 Oct →
cache12–16-0.0522%16 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0423%16 Oct →
inferno13–30.0128%16 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0612%15 Oct →
dust213–90.0230%15 Oct →
dust27–130.0226%15 Oct →
dust213–90.0527%15 Oct →
mirage13–100.0112%14 Oct →
anubis6–130.0216%12 Oct →
dust27–130.0326%11 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0529%4 Oct →
cache16–130.0216%3 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0711%3 Oct →
cache13–3-0.0313%3 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0219%3 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0930%3 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0021%3 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0120%3 Oct →
mirage13–110.0130%3 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.1233%1 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0514%1 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0831%18 Sept →
anubis15–150.0011%4 Sept →
dust213–110.0918%4 Sept →
inferno13–30.0420%4 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0318%4 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0125%16 Aug →
inferno6–130.0218%16 Aug →
anubis13–80.0813%16 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0517%16 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0211%15 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0123%15 Aug →
ancient8–130.0410%15 Aug →
cache13–30.0223%15 Aug →
cache13–50.0429%15 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0120%15 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0515%15 Aug →
dust213–100.008%15 Aug →
dust213–100.0614%15 Aug →
dust213–50.0918%15 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0418%14 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0017%14 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0520%14 Aug →
dust213–10-0.019%14 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0322%14 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0131%14 Aug →
nuke16–130.0221%14 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0414%14 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0120%14 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0426%13 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0318%13 Aug →
anubis10–130.0117%13 Aug →
nuke11–130.0118%13 Aug →
inferno13–70.0721%13 Aug →
cache13–100.0121%13 Aug →
anubis13–10.0319%13 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0617%13 Aug →
nuke15–150.0231%13 Aug →
dust213–100.1021%13 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0516%12 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0817%12 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0533%12 Aug →
dust213–90.0011%12 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0410%12 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0824%11 Aug →
inferno13–40.1320%11 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0818%8 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0214%8 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0624%8 Aug →
anubis13–70.1124%8 Aug →
dust20–12-0.050%7 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0523%7 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.