Burd Pauperranger

Burd Pauperranger — CS2 Stats

NL76561198115752047[U:1:155486319]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,351Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,868Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating27,344Top 5% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4399 of 247885 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (21 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,344 -60 20 May – 10 Sept · 32 days played
22,53227,949peak 27,94920 May10 Sept
28,321Peak Premier in tracked matches
37Days played since 2026-05-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 605 below peak (27,949)
  • -430 over 30 days · declining
  • +2,344 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,656 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,636), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate41.2%43.8%44.8%3.6% short
Shot accuracy13.8%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.971.021.030.06 short
Match win rate45.8%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBurd PauperrangerFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER27,344 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning46
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD38–60–2Last 10038%Win rateLLLLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.7pp headshot accuracy · +62ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim4.5
Utility5.6
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.9

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning4.6
Utility5.6
Mechanics2.5
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time551ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–0 · overpass, 20 Jun →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · ancient, 1 Jun →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · anubis, 11 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · overpass, 20 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 64% over 11mirageWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeD267–1927%-0.01
ancientC208–1240%0.01
anubisC188–1044%-0.01
mirageD123–925%-0.02
cacheA117–464%0.00
overpassC83–538%0.03
infernoC52–340%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

132,670Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
7,145Matches
45.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
41.2%Headshot %
13.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
19,335MVPs
2,868Hours (in match)
5,729Bombs planted
2,347Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4733,400
AWP11,738
P2503,848
Tec-93,439
P902,804
SSG 082,723

Lifetime map wins

7,768inferno
5,263nuke
4,419train
4,197dust2
1,191cbble
630vertigo
126office
123lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

515Matches
50%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
—ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
29.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
61.5%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
545msReaction time
26.3%T opening success
43.5%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
10.39HE damage / grenade
5.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4286 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.3077% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis0–5-0.0625%10 Sept →
ancient8–130.0427%10 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0016%6 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.1211%31 Aug →
inferno13–90.0013%31 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0234%31 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0413%26 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0210%26 Aug →
anubis13–110.0919%26 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0115%24 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0316%24 Aug →
nuke11–130.0720%23 Aug →
ancient3–130.0214%23 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0215%13 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0119%13 Aug →
anubis5–130.025%13 Aug →
ancient13–50.029%11 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0119%11 Aug →
cache13–60.0123%11 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.017%11 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0115%10 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0411%10 Aug →
cache13–2-0.006%10 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0314%9 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0013%9 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0223%4 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0117%4 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0315%4 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0514%3 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0313%3 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.0224%3 Aug →
anubis13–160.0110%2 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0320%23 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0517%23 Jul →
nuke13–110.0520%23 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0524%23 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0720%23 Jul →
anubis15–15-0.0423%21 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0011%21 Jul →
cache13–70.0330%21 Jul →
nuke13–80.0711%19 Jul →
anubis13–100.0313%19 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0319%19 Jul →
ancient12–160.069%19 Jul →
ancient6–130.0619%19 Jul →
cache13–80.0612%16 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0117%14 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0219%14 Jul →
cache13–90.0314%14 Jul →
anubis16–120.0818%9 Jul →
ancient13–40.0513%9 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0013%3 Jul →
ancient13–16-0.0016%3 Jul →
nuke4–130.0020%3 Jul →
inferno13–110.0321%28 Jun →
mirage11–130.0114%28 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.0624%28 Jun →
nuke2–130.0021%24 Jun →
overpass0–13-0.108%24 Jun →
ancient13–90.049%24 Jun →
nuke16–130.069%23 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0113%23 Jun →
nuke7–130.0413%21 Jun →
ancient4–13-0.058%21 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0124%20 Jun →
overpass6–130.0826%20 Jun →
overpass10–130.0425%20 Jun →
ancient12–160.0311%20 Jun →
nuke4–13-0.045%20 Jun →
overpass13–00.1116%20 Jun →
anubis13–6-0.0113%20 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0716%20 Jun →
overpass10–130.0822%16 Jun →
ancient16–140.0323%16 Jun →
nuke16–120.0113%16 Jun →
overpass9–60.0813%16 Jun →
nuke13–16-0.0318%15 Jun →
anubis14–16-0.0119%15 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0318%14 Jun →
nuke2–13-0.1016%14 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0210%7 Jun →
nuke6–13-0.067%4 Jun →
inferno7–130.0018%4 Jun →
ancient5–130.0638%1 Jun →
nuke4–13-0.0412%1 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0317%29 May →
nuke6–13-0.0214%29 May →
anubis4–13-0.0615%29 May →
nuke15–15-0.0313%28 May →
ancient10–13-0.0325%28 May →
overpass13–8-0.0316%28 May →
nuke13–10-0.0324%27 May →
ancient13–16-0.069%27 May →
mirage5–13-0.0323%27 May →
anubis13–110.0222%25 May →
mirage13–110.0716%25 May →
nuke7–13-0.0510%25 May →
nuke11–13-0.0022%22 May →
ancient13–100.0121%20 May →
overpass9–13-0.0112%20 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.