Logs

Logs — CS2 Stats

US76561198114272041[U:1:154006313]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

481Tracked matches61%Win rate2021Tracked since
813Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 9 Sep 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,417 -1,162 14 Sept12 Oct · 16 days played
14,88116,897peak 16,89714 Sept12 Oct
17,155Peak Premier in tracked matches
48Days played since 2025-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,417), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate48.1%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy9.2%12.0%12.4%3.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.011.021.040.02 short
Match win rate39.4%44.7%45.2%5.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLogsFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning30
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43498Last 10043%Win rateWWWWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · −71ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 661ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 35%
  • Avg reaction 682ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility3.3
Positioning3.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch1.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 670ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning3.0
Utility3.3
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact8.6

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time673ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 702ms → last ⅓ avg 673ms
Headshot accuracy34.4%+6.1%
first ⅓ avg 28.2% → last ⅓ avg 34.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–5 · inferno, 16 May
53%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · cache, 17 May
453msFastest reaction time · 7–1 · anubis, 30 Jan
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 28 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W5Current streak
411In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
overpassA2112957%0.00
dust2D1861233%-0.01
mirageC1761135%-0.03
nukeD1331023%0.00
cacheA95456%-0.02
ancientA74357%-0.02
anubisS54180%-0.03
warden3030%-0.04
inferno32167%0.04
poseidon21150%-0.02
vertigo2020%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

17,290Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
993Matches
39.4%Match win rate
48.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
9.2%Shot accuracy
1,674MVPs
347Hours (in match)
837Bombs planted
169Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,512dust2
760vertigo
541nuke
309inferno
99lake
71bank
45safehouse
24ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

96Matches
52%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
76.6ADR
60%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo2564%1.0114.9
Anubis2167%1.0115.8
Overpass1553%1.1414.6
Ancient1338%1.1918.8
Nuke729%1.3418.6
Dust2743%1.1312.7
Mirage729%1.1914.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

33.0%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.1%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
670msReaction time
27.0%T opening success
24.5%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
6.90HE damage / grenade
4.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4684 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.0213% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–100.0644%10 Sept
cache13–11-0.0243%10 Sept
overpass13–3-0.0320%7 Sept
ancient13–90.0122%7 Sept
dust213–60.0429%5 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0638%3 Sept
cache7–13-0.0833%6 Jun
poseidon9–30.1129%28 May
nuke5–9-0.0838%28 May
overpass2–13-0.0633%25 May
warden3–5-0.0343%23 May
cache13–10-0.0345%23 May
warden3–13-0.0538%17 May
cache11–13-0.0853%17 May
inferno8–8-0.1338%16 May
inferno9–50.2342%16 May
overpass9–20.0750%16 May
poseidon5–9-0.1519%16 May
mirage13–9-0.0523%15 May
cache13–9-0.0624%14 May
cache9–13-0.0527%14 May
cache13–60.0631%10 May
cache6–30.0350%10 May
cache7–130.0340%10 May
anubis13–8-0.0418%26 Apr
overpass12–120.0141%25 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0533%25 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0735%18 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0340%17 Mar
overpass13–70.0434%6 Feb
anubis13–6-0.0232%6 Feb
dust211–13-0.0616%1 Feb
nuke12–12-0.0133%1 Feb
mirage13–100.0019%1 Feb
anubis13–9-0.0328%1 Feb
nuke13–100.0835%1 Feb
mirage2–130.0133%1 Feb
nuke11–130.0629%1 Feb
overpass8–130.0441%31 Jan
overpass6–13-0.0336%31 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0532%30 Jan
mirage12–12-0.0226%30 Jan
dust213–90.0024%30 Jan
anubis7–1-0.0733%30 Jan
overpass13–11-0.0235%29 Jan
overpass13–100.1426%29 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0419%28 Jan
dust213–10.0124%28 Jan
nuke12–12-0.0824%28 Jan
ancient13–8-0.0138%28 Jan
dust213–10-0.0126%25 Jan
warden12–12-0.0533%25 Jan
dust211–130.0333%25 Jan
overpass6–13-0.0631%25 Jan
anubis11–130.0145%25 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0233%25 Jan
nuke8–130.0615%23 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0727%8 Jan
vertigo12–120.0131%8 Jan
nuke3–130.0530%7 Jan
overpass8–13-0.0147%7 Jan
dust27–13-0.0235%2 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0133%2 Jan
ancient11–130.0129%29 Nov
nuke9–13-0.0440%12 Oct
overpass13–100.0336%11 Oct
dust25–13-0.0143%11 Oct
inferno13–30.0226%11 Oct
mirage13–40.0545%11 Oct
overpass13–11-0.0224%10 Oct
dust210–130.0136%9 Oct
dust27–13-0.0325%8 Oct
mirage14–16-0.0127%8 Oct
dust26–13-0.0633%6 Oct
overpass11–13-0.0323%5 Oct
overpass13–60.0216%4 Oct
nuke13–10-0.0835%4 Oct
overpass13–10-0.0236%4 Oct
nuke11–130.0026%4 Oct
overpass13–60.0714%28 Sept
overpass5–13-0.0822%28 Sept
dust28–130.0138%28 Sept
nuke10–130.0434%25 Sept
dust28–13-0.0129%24 Sept
overpass13–30.0614%24 Sept
dust210–13-0.0315%23 Sept
ancient11–130.0138%22 Sept
overpass13–4-0.0326%22 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0115%21 Sept
mirage15–15-0.009%21 Sept
overpass7–13-0.0529%17 Sept
dust213–7-0.0239%17 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0533%14 Sept
dust213–10-0.0328%14 Sept
vertigo4–13-0.0733%11 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0735%11 Sept
dust22–13-0.0225%10 Sept
mirage0–13-0.0238%10 Sept
dust28–13-0.0639%9 Sept
mirage2–9-0.0824%9 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →