Biiz

Biiz — CS2 Stats

US76561199047090175[U:1:1086824447]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

362Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.9 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 29 Feb 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,749 -1,000 21 Apr5 May · 2 days played
14,74915,749peak 15,74921 Apr5 May
15,749Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2024-02-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBiizFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim37
Positioning37
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY484210Last 10048%Win rateLWWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −8.6pp headshot accuracy · −115ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.1 against its own average).

Aim3.7
Utility5.3
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.7
Positioning3.7
Utility5.3
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact6.7

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time605ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–0 · nuke, 18 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 6–4 · vertigo, 13 Oct
406msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · anubis, 26 Apr
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 18 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
811In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8nukeWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC1771041%-0.04
nukeD1331023%-0.03
anubisB136746%-0.01
overpassB126650%-0.01
ancientA106460%0.00
dust2B105550%-0.03
cacheS86275%-0.02
vertigoS64267%-0.04
warden3030%-0.06
inferno21150%-0.01
thera220100%-0.07
poseidon110100%0.05
train1010%-0.09
mills110100%-0.02
office1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

73Matches
51%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
50.4ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo2040%0.8714.1
Overpass1250%1.1816.1
Anubis1267%0.7813.8
Mirage1145%0.8611.8
Ancient1060%1.0415.9
Nuke450%0.9916.3
Dust2333%0.6513.0
Inferno1100%0.7316.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
25.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
24.0%Spray accuracy
68.3%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
587msReaction time
27.8%T opening success
24.9%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
6.90HE damage / grenade
14.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.8224% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.029%14 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0418%10 Sept
cache13–11-0.0321%10 Sept
overpass13–30.108%7 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0414%7 Sept
dust213–60.0414%5 Sept
cache13–11-0.0616%1 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0426%30 May
ancient9–13-0.0518%30 May
anubis9–13-0.068%30 May
mirage13–5-0.0236%30 May
poseidon9–30.0523%28 May
nuke5–9-0.0528%28 May
overpass2–13-0.0632%25 May
warden3–5-0.0117%23 May
cache13–10-0.0416%23 May
overpass13–70.0226%19 May
warden3–13-0.0630%17 May
cache11–13-0.029%17 May
mirage13–9-0.0621%15 May
cache13–9-0.0220%14 May
cache9–13-0.0420%14 May
cache8–2-0.0027%3 May
cache13–110.0229%3 May
mirage5–13-0.0835%26 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0213%26 Apr
overpass12–12-0.0810%25 Apr
ancient13–60.0028%25 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0417%12 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0919%18 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0621%17 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0619%22 Feb
dust23–13-0.0719%22 Feb
ancient15–15-0.0317%21 Feb
ancient13–70.0329%21 Feb
overpass13–7-0.029%6 Feb
anubis13–60.0419%6 Feb
dust211–13-0.0615%1 Feb
nuke12–120.0520%1 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0118%1 Feb
anubis13–90.0525%1 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0321%1 Feb
mirage2–13-0.0710%1 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0718%1 Feb
mirage13–160.0013%1 Feb
anubis4–130.0219%1 Feb
dust211–13-0.0417%1 Feb
overpass8–13-0.0420%31 Jan
overpass6–13-0.0121%31 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0321%30 Jan
mirage12–120.0113%30 Jan
dust213–9-0.0016%30 Jan
anubis7–10.0620%30 Jan
overpass13–110.0120%29 Jan
overpass13–100.0518%29 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0123%28 Jan
nuke12–120.0025%28 Jan
ancient13–80.0025%28 Jan
vertigo13–5-0.0521%26 Jan
dust213–10-0.0314%25 Jan
warden12–12-0.0913%25 Jan
dust211–13-0.0530%25 Jan
overpass6–13-0.083%25 Jan
anubis11–13-0.0611%25 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0212%25 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0526%24 Jan
anubis7–13-0.0812%24 Jan
mirage12–12-0.1111%24 Jan
nuke8–13-0.0743%23 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0225%8 Jan
vertigo12–12-0.0513%8 Jan
dust213–11-0.0520%27 Dec
nuke5–13-0.0821%27 Dec
train1–13-0.090%3 May
overpass12–12-0.0713%13 Oct
vertigo6–4-0.0150%13 Oct
overpass9–60.0621%6 Oct
inferno7–9-0.1316%3 Oct
nuke7–9-0.0727%3 Oct
mirage13–7-0.0120%2 Sept
thera13–8-0.0619%2 Sept
dust213–50.0023%2 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0214%1 Sept
mills13–9-0.0221%18 Aug
nuke13–00.1223%18 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0316%17 Aug
thera13–10-0.0711%17 Aug
office7–13-0.0113%17 Aug
vertigo13–8-0.0123%27 May
vertigo2–7-0.0918%5 May
ancient10–130.006%28 Apr
dust214–16-0.0418%27 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0023%21 Apr
ancient13–60.0930%21 Apr
anubis7–130.0015%4 Mar
vertigo13–9-0.0321%4 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0319%3 Mar
ancient13–80.059%3 Mar
anubis17–19-0.0017%3 Mar
inferno9–40.1010%29 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →