kraavi naine

kraavi naine — CS2 Stats

EE76561198112310004[U:1:152044276]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

440Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,786Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating25,100Top 25% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21487 of 261709 tracked
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Oct 2026 (43 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,100 +15,459 25 Feb – 3 Oct · 10 days played
9,64125,100peak 25,10025 Feb3 Oct
25,100Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-02-04

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,100
  • +13,406 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,900 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,144), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerRed band medianGold band medianvs Gold band
Headshot rate44.8%49.3%51.2%6.4% short
Shot accuracy16.5%13.3%12.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.191.121.18meets
Match win rate50.2%48.5%52.2%2.0% short

This profile matches the typical Gold band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Gold band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkraavi nainePREMIER25,100 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning48
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–48–5Last 10047%Win rateLTLLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.06 avg rating · −11.2pp headshot accuracy · +177ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 477ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 389ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility3.9
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch6.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning4.8
Utility3.9
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time458ms−231ms
first ⅓ avg 688ms → last ⅓ avg 458ms
Headshot accuracy27.1%+6.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 27.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 1 Oct →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 2 Oct →
117msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · dust2, 1 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 1 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 15dust2Weakest map · 30% over 37
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D3711–2630%-0.02
mirageA2817–1161%0.00
infernoS1510–567%0.00
nukeC52–340%-0.01
ancient—43–175%0.02
anubis—42–250%0.05
cache—21–150%-0.03
train—21–150%-0.01
overpass—20–20%0.02
alpine—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 37). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

51,454Lifetime kills
1.19K/D · Top 50% of Red band
2,878Matches
50.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Red band
44.8%Headshot %
16.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Red band
9,106MVPs
867Hours (in match)
1,356Bombs planted
450Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,367
AWP5,971
SSG 081,618
FAMAS1,287
MP91,075

Lifetime map wins

3,987dust2
2,005inferno
1,200nuke
841lake
611vertigo
377train
258office
208cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

15Matches
27%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
59.0ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2100%0.6612.5
Inferno10%0.245.0
Dust210%0.326.0
Ancient10%0.699.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.8%Headshot accuracy
39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.5%Spray accuracy
74.7%Counter-strafing
6.9°Preaim
465msReaction time
46.9%T opening success
32.7%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
10.36HE damage / grenade
3.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4771 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.7218% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 37 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.1026%28 Oct →
dust212–12-0.099%28 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0518%28 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0218%18 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0017%13 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0512%13 Oct →
ancient13–100.0517%3 Oct →
anubis4–10.030%3 Oct →
inferno13–50.0491%2 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.029%2 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.10100%2 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0811%2 Oct →
inferno13–50.0815%1 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.050%1 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0517%1 Oct →
dust213–1-0.0012%1 Oct →
inferno9–20.2333%1 Oct →
mirage13–70.1239%1 Oct →
dust24–130.0280%1 Oct →
anubis16–130.2321%1 Oct →
inferno3–130.1052%1 Oct →
ancient13–110.0545%1 Oct →
inferno16–13-0.0616%17 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0416%17 Aug →
mirage13–70.079%17 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0520%13 Aug →
mirage9–20.0241%12 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0021%10 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0422%10 Aug →
mirage13–100.0121%10 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0932%5 Aug →
dust213–50.0537%5 Aug →
mirage13–90.0222%5 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0523%21 Jul →
inferno16–12-0.0324%17 Jul →
ancient13–80.0119%25 Jun →
cache13–110.0226%11 Jun →
nuke9–130.0321%21 May →
dust213–30.0915%20 May →
inferno13–10-0.0415%26 Apr →
mirage13–7-0.0125%26 Apr →
train11–130.0624%25 Apr →
dust211–130.0018%25 Apr →
mirage13–50.0236%20 Apr →
train13–6-0.0916%20 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0022%20 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0119%16 Apr →
dust213–11-0.0610%14 Apr →
mirage13–2-0.0016%14 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0637%14 Apr →
mirage13–90.0321%13 Apr →
dust212–120.0224%8 Apr →
mirage13–50.0124%8 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0219%7 Apr →
dust23–130.0132%7 Apr →
mirage13–10.0115%2 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0820%2 Apr →
dust24–13-0.0710%1 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0125%11 Mar →
mirage7–13-0.0415%11 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0124%11 Mar →
dust210–130.0216%9 Mar →
dust24–13-0.0640%9 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.0514%9 Mar →
overpass8–13-0.0024%9 Mar →
mirage9–130.0110%9 Mar →
dust211–130.0042%8 Mar →
nuke4–13-0.1025%8 Mar →
dust213–11-0.0318%8 Mar →
dust212–12-0.0415%8 Mar →
dust213–30.0217%8 Mar →
mirage13–70.0636%8 Mar →
inferno13–10.0417%8 Mar →
dust213–100.0833%8 Mar →
dust23–13-0.1025%7 Mar →
dust21–13-0.0638%7 Mar →
dust212–12-0.0525%7 Mar →
dust25–13-0.1021%7 Mar →
inferno7–13-0.0436%26 Feb →
nuke13–7-0.0131%25 Feb →
nuke13–60.0324%24 Feb →
dust28–130.0012%18 Feb →
mirage13–7-0.0018%18 Feb →
mirage8–130.0815%18 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.0624%18 Feb →
dust28–13-0.0313%18 Feb →
ancient5–13-0.0427%17 Feb →
alpine3–13-0.0415%17 Feb →
mirage13–90.0117%16 Feb →
mirage13–4-0.0113%16 Feb →
dust213–100.0419%12 Feb →
nuke3–13-0.0118%9 Feb →
dust25–130.0212%9 Feb →
dust28–13-0.0725%9 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0715%9 Feb →
dust212–120.0122%9 Feb →
mirage1–13-0.0017%5 Feb →
overpass5–130.0321%5 Feb →
mirage7–130.0422%4 Feb →
anubis8–13-0.0218%4 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.