EntryBerry

EntryBerry — CS2 Stats

76561198112193939[U:1:151928211]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

889Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,345Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAll-Rounder
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Aug 2026 (49 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 889 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,368 +1,447 29 May – 2 Jul · 11 days played
21,92125,419peak 25,41929 May2 Jul
25,419Peak Premier in tracked matches
20Days played since 2026-05-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,220), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate43.8%45.7%46.8%3.0% short
Shot accuracy20.4%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.081.051.06meets
Match win rate46.2%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEntryBerryFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning49
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateLWWWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 554ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.9
Utility5.3
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch5.2

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning4.9
Utility5.3
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time573ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 10–13 · inferno, 7 Jul →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · cache, 18 Jun →
422msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 8 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 7 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 57% over 23anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2313–1057%-0.00
dust2C156–940%-0.01
ancientA148–657%0.02
infernoB147–750%0.02
cacheB126–650%0.02
nukeD93–633%-0.01
overpassD62–433%-0.02
anubisD51–420%-0.00
sanctum—10–10%-0.09
vertigo—11–0100%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

78,681Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
3,304Matches
46.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
43.8%Headshot %
20.4%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 7 players
10,839MVPs
1,345Hours (in match)
1,867Bombs planted
683Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,868
AWP14,651
P2501,365
UMP-451,117
SSG 081,048

Lifetime map wins

7,969dust2
5,301inferno
756train
681nuke
477cbble
315vertigo
94lake
56italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

230Matches
55%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
80.6ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1669%1.2419.1
Inferno922%0.8912.6
Ancient875%1.2215.0
Dust2650%1.0215.2
Cache333%1.3321.7
Anubis30%0.8515.7
Overpass2100%0.9413.0
Train10%0.8822.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.5%Spray accuracy
87.5%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
571msReaction time
29.9%T opening success
49.0%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
14.28HE damage / grenade
3.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.0287 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.8644% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–130.0124%13 Jul →
mirage13–60.0412%13 Jul →
cache13–80.0524%13 Jul →
cache13–90.0411%13 Jul →
cache5–130.0221%13 Jul →
dust210–130.0131%11 Jul →
mirage16–140.0826%11 Jul →
ancient13–90.1233%11 Jul →
ancient10–130.0313%11 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0316%11 Jul →
cache9–13-0.049%11 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0713%10 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0611%10 Jul →
cache13–70.0525%10 Jul →
mirage10–130.0118%10 Jul →
overpass5–13-0.0023%8 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0221%8 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0220%8 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0432%7 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0121%7 Jul →
inferno10–130.1514%7 Jul →
cache13–20.0718%7 Jul →
nuke5–130.0327%7 Jul →
dust213–10.0119%7 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0219%7 Jul →
cache13–3-0.0134%7 Jul →
cache13–50.0314%7 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0117%7 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0215%7 Jul →
mirage13–40.0833%7 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0320%2 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.0222%2 Jul →
dust29–130.0235%2 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0117%2 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0421%2 Jul →
ancient7–130.0018%2 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0222%2 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0020%2 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0130%29 Jun →
ancient1–13-0.0910%29 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0728%29 Jun →
dust213–50.0633%29 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0117%29 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0425%28 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0322%28 Jun →
overpass13–90.0115%28 Jun →
mirage13–4-0.0614%28 Jun →
mirage13–10.1316%28 Jun →
dust23–13-0.0618%28 Jun →
overpass13–11-0.0112%27 Jun →
dust26–130.0014%27 Jun →
dust213–11-0.034%26 Jun →
mirage11–13-0.0125%23 Jun →
ancient13–20.1427%23 Jun →
mirage13–16-0.0322%23 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0215%23 Jun →
nuke12–160.0218%19 Jun →
dust210–130.0021%19 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0325%19 Jun →
inferno13–40.1126%19 Jun →
overpass3–13-0.0027%19 Jun →
dust21–13-0.0833%19 Jun →
ancient9–13-0.069%19 Jun →
cache2–13-0.0338%18 Jun →
anubis11–130.0828%14 Jun →
mirage2–13-0.0929%14 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.0313%5 Jun →
inferno13–4-0.0525%4 Jun →
inferno11–130.0114%4 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0211%4 Jun →
overpass11–130.0633%4 Jun →
anubis8–13-0.0429%4 Jun →
mirage13–90.0327%4 Jun →
cache8–130.0017%4 Jun →
sanctum5–9-0.0921%3 Jun →
inferno9–50.0716%3 Jun →
overpass5–9-0.1610%3 Jun →
vertigo9–4-0.0835%3 Jun →
nuke7–9-0.0719%3 Jun →
ancient16–130.019%31 May →
nuke13–110.0121%31 May →
nuke13–9-0.019%31 May →
ancient13–100.0221%31 May →
dust26–00.0110%31 May →
mirage0–13-0.0337%31 May →
anubis13–6-0.0219%31 May →
inferno16–14-0.0129%31 May →
nuke8–80.0430%30 May →
dust213–110.0518%30 May →
mirage15–150.0315%30 May →
inferno13–4-0.0126%30 May →
inferno11–13-0.0116%30 May →
inferno13–20.118%30 May →
ancient13–40.1010%30 May →
mirage13–6-0.0021%30 May →
ancient13–60.0418%30 May →
mirage13–50.0413%29 May →
mirage13–40.017%29 May →
cache9–130.0814%29 May →
inferno8–13-0.0412%29 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.