Extra slut olive oil

Extra slut olive oil — CS2 Stats

FI76561198110319790[U:1:150054062]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

955Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,884Blue band · top ~29% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11160 of 17099 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGExtra slut olive oilPREMIER14,884 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning62
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48448Last 10048%Win rateLLLWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.0
Aggression9.7
Utility3.5
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning6.2
Utility3.5
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time608ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 620ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%−5.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — italy 12–12
132Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 59% over 17mirageWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeA1710759%0.03
nukeB158753%0.02
infernoA148657%-0.01
cacheA116555%-0.00
dust2D82625%0.00
mirageD71614%-0.02
ancientC73443%-0.00
anubisB63350%-0.01
italy42250%0.07
shelter21150%0.03
overpass21150%0.03
stronghold220100%0.02
fachwerk1010%-0.02
boulder110100%-0.05
vertigo1010%-0.04
alpine1010%0.00
warden1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

472Matches
51%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
79.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4045%1.2716.7
Dust23554%1.1217.3
Inferno3256%1.0816.3
Nuke2560%1.0816.4
Anubis1136%0.8112.6
Ancient540%1.0012.6
Vertigo30%0.539.0
Train10%0.448.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
83.8%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
613msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
55.4%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
8.23HE damage / grenade
3.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3489 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.1143% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–13-0.0923%15 Aug
dust211–13-0.0711%15 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0317%14 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0210%14 Aug
cache11–13-0.0011%14 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0515%14 Aug
nuke13–50.0316%14 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0125%14 Aug
nuke13–40.105%14 Aug
dust23–13-0.0323%14 Aug
mirage14–160.0218%14 Aug
inferno11–130.0611%14 Aug
dust213–20.0733%14 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0318%14 Aug
inferno13–60.0211%14 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0115%14 Aug
office13–110.0043%9 Aug
cache13–60.0321%9 Aug
mirage5–130.0317%9 Aug
ancient8–13-0.057%8 Aug
cache13–16-0.0217%8 Aug
nuke10–130.0318%8 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0810%8 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0414%8 Aug
nuke13–60.0022%8 Aug
cache13–110.0416%8 Aug
dust28–130.0124%8 Aug
cache7–13-0.0314%8 Aug
inferno13–9-0.059%8 Aug
shelter7–130.0723%8 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0717%8 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0027%8 Aug
mirage13–100.0017%8 Aug
dust29–13-0.0420%7 Aug
nuke11–130.0513%7 Aug
cache10–130.0519%7 Aug
cache13–8-0.0727%7 Aug
nuke13–50.0818%7 Aug
cache13–50.0410%7 Aug
fachwerk12–12-0.0224%6 Aug
boulder13–11-0.0520%6 Aug
shelter13–70.0017%6 Aug
dust214–160.036%1 Jul
mirage4–13-0.115%1 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0018%26 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0524%26 Jun
anubis6–130.0012%1 Jun
overpass13–60.0819%1 Jun
cache13–20.019%31 May
vertigo3–13-0.0417%31 May
office13–50.1014%31 May
italy12–12-0.009%31 May
office13–8-0.0229%24 May
italy12–120.1413%23 May
office11–130.0423%9 May
nuke13–110.0212%8 May
office12–120.0437%8 May
cache6–13-0.077%8 May
office13–8-0.0121%7 May
office13–30.0416%7 May
office4–00.0520%7 May
mirage10–13-0.0913%7 May
alpine10–130.0014%7 May
stronghold13–2-0.0629%7 May
office12–120.0345%7 May
inferno9–130.0319%7 May
inferno13–60.0715%6 May
nuke13–100.0815%5 May
nuke9–130.0812%5 May
office10–130.0124%3 May
inferno10–130.0114%3 May
mirage10–13-0.0015%3 May
ancient13–70.0518%3 May
nuke13–80.0028%3 May
cache13–110.0311%29 Apr
italy13–60.1127%28 Apr
office13–2-0.0356%28 Apr
office13–50.1038%28 Apr
dust213–30.1023%26 Apr
nuke1–13-0.0733%26 Apr
anubis13–9-0.020%26 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0325%26 Apr
dust24–13-0.0625%26 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0357%26 Apr
ancient12–120.0319%26 Apr
nuke12–12-0.0317%26 Apr
anubis13–30.0418%26 Apr
office10–130.0713%26 Apr
warden11–130.0524%26 Apr
nuke16–12-0.0426%23 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0015%23 Apr
nuke9–130.0113%21 Apr
italy13–60.0245%21 Apr
office13–90.0812%17 Apr
nuke12–12-0.0530%17 Apr
office13–50.0433%17 Apr
office8–13-0.0040%17 Apr
stronghold13–100.1013%17 Apr
anubis5–40.046%17 Apr
office9–13-0.0320%16 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →