j3NKEM

j3NKEM — CS2 Stats

76561198098116968[U:1:137851240]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,141Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,810Blue band · top ~29.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10264 of 15635 tracked
FaceitLevel 3 · 735 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGj3NKEMFACEITLevel 3 · 735 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER14,810 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning52
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51436Last 10051%Win rateWLLLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.6
Aggression6.5
Utility4.4
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch1.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.2
Utility4.4
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time610ms+0ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms
Headshot accuracy14.0%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–5
132Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
512In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

fachwerkBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 35% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C1761135%-0.00
infernoB147750%0.01
nukeS129375%0.02
mirageB115645%0.02
anubisC104640%-0.01
cacheA106460%0.01
officeS75271%0.04
ancientC52340%-0.03
fachwerkS54180%0.03
boulder31233%0.03
shelter21150%-0.02
italy2020%0.03
overpass110100%0.01
vertigo1010%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

583Matches
47%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
61.2ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno3100%1.0115.0
Dust2250%0.5010.5
Nuke1100%0.4611.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy
40.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.4%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
617msReaction time
34.0%T opening success
52.1%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
9.08HE damage / grenade
3.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4488% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.4045 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.9886% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–40.036%26 Aug
mirage7–13-0.069%25 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0413%18 Aug
dust211–13-0.0621%18 Aug
dust213–110.0124%18 Aug
dust213–9-0.0212%18 Aug
dust210–13-0.048%17 Aug
nuke13–30.067%17 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0414%17 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0711%16 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0022%16 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0510%16 Aug
nuke11–13-0.074%15 Aug
nuke13–100.0115%15 Aug
inferno13–20.0422%15 Aug
mirage13–80.0815%15 Aug
dust213–40.0613%15 Aug
dust23–13-0.0417%15 Aug
dust25–13-0.0310%15 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0013%15 Aug
dust211–130.0718%15 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0215%14 Aug
inferno13–60.0714%14 Aug
cache11–13-0.029%14 Aug
anubis7–130.0318%14 Aug
nuke13–50.039%14 Aug
inferno16–130.0827%14 Aug
nuke13–4-0.038%14 Aug
dust23–130.0114%14 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0022%14 Aug
inferno11–130.0414%14 Aug
dust213–20.0617%14 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0314%14 Aug
dust213–60.0717%14 Aug
anubis7–130.0116%14 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0521%13 Aug
ancient10–13-0.033%13 Aug
anubis13–9-0.026%13 Aug
cache16–130.0519%13 Aug
mirage13–50.1522%13 Aug
cache13–40.0611%13 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0016%12 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0115%12 Aug
mirage15–150.0414%12 Aug
ancient16–130.039%11 Aug
dust28–13-0.0131%11 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0412%11 Aug
mirage13–60.0913%11 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0927%11 Aug
mirage13–80.0310%10 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0220%10 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0118%10 Aug
dust210–13-0.0122%10 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0139%10 Aug
dust28–13-0.0718%9 Aug
nuke12–16-0.0124%9 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0311%9 Aug
anubis11–13-0.053%8 Aug
inferno11–130.0313%8 Aug
nuke13–60.0519%8 Aug
cache13–11-0.039%8 Aug
dust28–13-0.0317%8 Aug
cache7–13-0.014%8 Aug
inferno13–90.0211%8 Aug
shelter7–13-0.0317%8 Aug
inferno13–90.0311%8 Aug
inferno13–60.0118%8 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0010%8 Aug
cache10–13-0.0415%7 Aug
cache13–80.0411%7 Aug
nuke13–50.057%7 Aug
cache13–50.0015%7 Aug
fachwerk12–12-0.0219%6 Aug
boulder13–110.0610%6 Aug
shelter13–7-0.0117%6 Aug
dust213–6-0.013%5 Aug
inferno11–130.0015%5 Aug
dust214–16-0.0313%5 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0415%5 Aug
fachwerk13–5-0.0420%5 Aug
fachwerk13–8-0.0111%4 Aug
boulder8–130.0213%4 Aug
fachwerk13–90.1423%4 Aug
fachwerk13–20.064%4 Aug
boulder8–130.0018%4 Aug
anubis6–130.047%1 Jun
overpass13–60.015%1 Jun
cache13–20.0621%31 May
vertigo3–130.0620%31 May
office13–50.1110%31 May
italy12–12-0.0422%31 May
office13–80.1320%24 May
italy12–120.0917%23 May
office11–13-0.0319%9 May
nuke13–110.1118%8 May
office12–12-0.0526%8 May
cache6–130.028%8 May
office13–80.0717%7 May
office13–30.0615%7 May
office4–0-0.020%7 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →