Fizz

Fizz — CS2 Stats

76561198108508957[U:1:148243229]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,527Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,616Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,780Top 25% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24392 of 252602 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,515 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Aug 2026 (50 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,527 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,780 +3,347 25 Jul – 28 Aug · 15 days played
21,43324,780peak 24,78025 Jul28 Aug
24,991Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,515Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
20Days played since 2026-07-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,515
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 485 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,780
  • +1,852 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 220 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,061), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate43.6%50.9%
Shot accuracy19.5%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.691.09
Match win rate52.0%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFizzFACEITLevel 10 · 2,515 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,780 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,515csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning60
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–43Last 10057%Win rateLWWLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · +3.5pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 486ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility4.7
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.0
Utility4.7
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time536ms−64ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 9 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–9 · mirage, 8 Aug →
328msFastest reaction time · 5–11 · mirage, 9 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 26 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 12anubisWeakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC188–1044%0.04
dust2B189–950%0.02
ancientS1611–569%0.04
infernoB147–750%0.04
cacheS1210–283%0.06
mirageB115–645%0.00
nukeA117–464%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

124,684Lifetime kills
1.69K/D · Top 5% of Level 10 players
4,370Matches
52.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 10 players
43.6%Headshot %
19.5%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 10 players
13,012MVPs
1,616Hours (in match)
4,410Bombs planted
1,265Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4740,840
AWP15,419
P2502,833
SSG 082,652
MP92,579

Lifetime map wins

10,413dust2
4,349nuke
4,057inferno
2,814vertigo
1,443office
953train
758cbble
197lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

481Matches
60%Win rate
1.35Avg K/D
89.7ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke3253%1.3716.7
Ancient2568%1.3519.2
Inferno2357%1.3819.1
Dust22352%1.2318.4
Vertigo2264%1.2617.3
Overpass1662%1.4018.8
Anubis1136%1.3421.4
Train978%1.4516.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
43.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.2%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
536msReaction time
33.2%T opening success
55.8%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
9.93HE damage / grenade
6.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4591 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2168% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–130.0218%22 Aug →
ancient13–60.0512%22 Aug →
ancient13–50.0329%22 Aug →
dust27–130.0015%22 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0422%20 Aug →
cache13–70.0425%20 Aug →
ancient11–130.0011%20 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0528%20 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0222%13 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0613%13 Aug →
anubis13–110.0517%9 Aug →
inferno13–40.2216%9 Aug →
dust213–80.0511%9 Aug →
ancient10–130.0118%9 Aug →
mirage5–11-0.050%9 Aug →
mirage6–130.0116%9 Aug →
dust213–50.1320%9 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0117%8 Aug →
inferno13–40.1323%8 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0620%8 Aug →
nuke9–130.0623%8 Aug →
ancient13–80.0514%8 Aug →
mirage2–9-0.05100%8 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0214%8 Aug →
dust212–160.0010%8 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0620%7 Aug →
cache13–70.0717%7 Aug →
anubis13–16-0.0511%7 Aug →
anubis13–50.1127%7 Aug →
dust213–70.0218%7 Aug →
inferno13–40.1015%7 Aug →
dust213–110.0315%6 Aug →
inferno11–130.0511%6 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0119%6 Aug →
anubis19–160.0417%6 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0021%6 Aug →
nuke13–3-0.0323%6 Aug →
anubis13–70.0817%4 Aug →
cache6–130.0818%4 Aug →
anubis11–130.0520%4 Aug →
ancient13–100.0917%4 Aug →
anubis13–80.1121%1 Aug →
inferno12–160.0118%1 Aug →
anubis16–130.0116%31 Jul →
nuke13–50.0213%31 Jul →
cache13–40.0419%31 Jul →
cache13–70.0422%29 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0317%29 Jul →
cache7–130.0525%29 Jul →
ancient13–100.0524%29 Jul →
cache13–90.0814%28 Jul →
ancient4–70.0733%28 Jul →
dust213–90.2020%28 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0329%28 Jul →
dust25–10.0922%28 Jul →
inferno13–40.0324%28 Jul →
cache19–170.038%27 Jul →
ancient13–100.1117%27 Jul →
cache13–10.1643%26 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0019%26 Jul →
dust21–13-0.0618%25 Jul →
ancient13–60.1019%25 Jul →
ancient13–30.1130%25 Jul →
nuke13–110.0725%25 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0414%25 Jul →
dust213–90.0110%25 Jul →
mirage13–80.1318%24 Jul →
anubis3–130.0548%24 Jul →
cache13–20.0522%24 Jul →
anubis11–130.1231%24 Jul →
mirage13–60.1335%24 Jul →
mirage5–0-0.025%24 Jul →
inferno7–130.0010%24 Jul →
nuke8–130.028%24 Jul →
mirage2–13-0.0326%24 Jul →
nuke13–60.0726%24 Jul →
ancient13–40.0627%23 Jul →
nuke4–130.0432%23 Jul →
cache13–70.0920%23 Jul →
inferno9–130.0021%23 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0620%23 Jul →
anubis13–20.1327%23 Jul →
nuke13–100.0717%22 Jul →
dust23–130.0030%22 Jul →
mirage6–130.0126%22 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0230%22 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.017%22 Jul →
nuke13–80.0216%22 Jul →
nuke13–10.1710%22 Jul →
mirage13–6-0.0017%22 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0122%22 Jul →
dust216–140.0110%22 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0220%22 Jul →
inferno13–70.1321%21 Jul →
ancient9–130.0111%20 Jul →
dust210–130.0821%20 Jul →
inferno13–60.0422%20 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0416%20 Jul →
anubis13–30.0616%20 Jul →
dust213–50.0618%20 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.