Wilhelm Schmidt

Wilhelm Schmidt — CS2 Stats

DE76561198105316562[U:1:145050834]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

182Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning49
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD39529Last 10039%Win rateTTWWLLLWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · +16ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 212 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 10

  • 343 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 785 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility4.8
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.9
Utility4.8
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time594ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−7.9%
first ⅓ avg 24.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–6 · inferno, 3 Feb
53%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · inferno, 3 Feb
453msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · dust2, 25 Aug
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 22 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
26In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 50% over 18dust2Weakest map · 31% over 45
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D45143131%-0.01
mirageB26121446%-0.01
infernoB189950%0.01
cache31233%-0.04
office31233%0.04
ancient220100%0.04
anubis2020%-0.06
nuke1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 45). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.9%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
586msReaction time
38.4%T opening success
34.4%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
8.03HE damage / grenade
8.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.4467% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 45 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache12–12-0.0113%12 Sept
dust212–120.1012%12 Sept
mirage13–110.0033%12 Sept
inferno13–40.0326%12 Sept
mirage0–6-0.080%12 Sept
inferno3–13-0.1111%11 Sept
dust210–13-0.0411%11 Sept
dust213–40.0720%11 Sept
dust212–120.0422%11 Sept
dust210–13-0.0423%11 Sept
cache13–5-0.0324%10 Sept
dust212–12-0.076%10 Sept
dust213–40.1220%10 Sept
dust213–50.009%10 Sept
mirage11–130.0139%10 Sept
office6–130.034%8 Sept
dust27–13-0.054%8 Sept
office13–50.0725%8 Sept
office12–120.0213%8 Sept
dust27–13-0.037%4 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0319%4 Sept
dust28–130.0121%4 Sept
dust29–13-0.0222%2 Sept
dust213–50.0143%2 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0316%1 Sept
dust210–13-0.039%1 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0213%1 Sept
dust27–13-0.0215%29 Aug
dust212–12-0.0610%29 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0517%29 Aug
dust213–4-0.0111%29 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0417%29 Aug
dust26–13-0.067%27 Aug
mirage12–120.0019%27 Aug
dust211–13-0.0817%27 Aug
dust28–13-0.0220%25 Aug
dust210–13-0.0216%25 Aug
dust26–13-0.0530%25 Aug
dust24–130.0230%24 Aug
dust25–13-0.0332%24 Aug
cache5–13-0.0713%24 Aug
dust213–10-0.0421%23 Aug
anubis3–13-0.1024%23 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0014%23 Aug
dust23–13-0.0322%22 Aug
dust213–10.0320%22 Aug
inferno9–130.0210%21 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0218%21 Aug
dust25–13-0.0516%21 Aug
dust213–80.0025%21 Aug
mirage13–60.0011%20 Aug
dust213–60.0122%20 Aug
dust210–130.0320%20 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0313%19 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0728%19 Aug
inferno13–40.0115%18 Aug
dust213–11-0.0813%18 Aug
inferno13–70.0419%16 Aug
dust26–13-0.0417%16 Aug
dust213–70.0219%16 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0512%15 Aug
dust28–13-0.0926%15 Aug
inferno3–130.0026%17 Feb
dust213–9-0.0017%17 Feb
mirage13–80.0810%17 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0511%16 Feb
ancient13–40.1127%16 Feb
inferno6–130.0013%16 Feb
mirage8–130.0124%4 Feb
dust211–13-0.0414%4 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0014%4 Feb
mirage3–130.0142%3 Feb
inferno9–60.1636%3 Feb
inferno9–20.1053%3 Feb
inferno10–13-0.057%1 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0317%1 Feb
mirage13–20.0342%1 Feb
mirage13–100.0213%31 Jan
dust28–13-0.0422%30 Jan
dust27–130.0028%29 Jan
mirage10–130.0436%29 Jan
dust23–13-0.0527%29 Jan
mirage7–130.0318%29 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0134%28 Jan
mirage13–3-0.0032%28 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0433%27 Jan
inferno13–70.0510%27 Jan
dust210–130.1023%26 Jan
inferno10–130.0320%26 Jan
mirage5–130.0216%25 Jan
mirage13–60.0320%25 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0735%23 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0329%23 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0116%23 Jan
dust211–130.0319%20 Jan
dust27–13-0.1225%20 Jan
inferno12–120.0520%18 Jan
mirage11–13-0.0828%18 Jan
dust213–70.0931%18 Jan
dust27–40.045%18 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →