슈의라면가게헤드쉐프

슈의라면가게헤드쉐프 — CS2 Stats

CX76561198104131971[U:1:143866243]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

980Tracked matches73%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,955Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating8.5 ElitePositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,474Top 10% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10480 of 261506 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Nov 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,474 +1,685 7 Aug – 8 Nov · 29 days played
24,23826,697peak 26,6977 Aug8 Nov
26,907Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-08-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 223 below peak (26,697)
  • +382 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,972 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,526 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-26
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-26

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate50.9%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy16.5%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.140.991.02above
Match win rate49.1%43.9%44.7%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 5 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG슈의라면가게헤드쉐프FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER26,474 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning81
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–42Last 10058%Win rateLWLWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.7pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 470ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility5.6
Positioning8.1
Opening Duels7.1

Sharp aimerStrong positioning

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 69% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning8.1
Utility5.6
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels8.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 8.5/10 (Elite), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time491ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 527ms → last ⅓ avg 491ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%−4.4%
first ⅓ avg 25.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–5 · anubis, 26 Oct →
71%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · dust2, 28 Aug →
359msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 30 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 6 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
8–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 12anubisWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2512–1348%0.01
mirageS1611–569%0.02
anubisC146–843%0.02
cacheA138–562%0.03
nukeS129–375%0.02
ancientA117–464%0.01
infernoA85–363%0.03
train—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

194,208Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
7,480Matches
49.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
50.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
16.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 4 players
27,728MVPs
3,416Hours (in match)
7,878Bombs planted
3,462Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4755,661
AWP32,309
P2505,380
SSG 083,710
Knife3,015
Tec-92,683

Lifetime map wins

23,655dust2
10,399inferno
2,974train
2,448cbble
2,327nuke
535vertigo
178lake
53bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

24Matches
46%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
—ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
40.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
81.2%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
491msReaction time
68.8%T opening success
62.8%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
9.07HE damage / grenade
10.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache8–13-0.0110%8 Nov →
dust213–80.0212%8 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.0510%8 Nov →
ancient13–100.0016%8 Nov →
inferno13–90.1229%6 Nov →
nuke13–100.0630%6 Nov →
cache13–110.1421%6 Nov →
inferno6–13-0.0143%6 Nov →
mirage13–110.0127%6 Nov →
cache11–13-0.0022%6 Nov →
dust213–70.1325%6 Nov →
mirage13–80.0629%6 Nov →
dust25–130.0360%3 Nov →
nuke13–40.020%3 Nov →
inferno13–70.0229%3 Nov →
cache13–7-0.0318%3 Nov →
ancient13–90.0018%3 Nov →
cache13–100.0523%3 Nov →
mirage13–110.0322%3 Nov →
ancient13–160.0521%3 Nov →
nuke2–13-0.1017%3 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.0318%29 Oct →
cache13–60.0716%29 Oct →
cache13–60.0513%29 Oct →
ancient13–80.0515%26 Oct →
dust213–60.0819%26 Oct →
nuke13–80.0613%26 Oct →
mirage13–80.0227%26 Oct →
anubis13–50.1716%26 Oct →
ancient13–30.0718%26 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0417%24 Oct →
nuke13–100.0215%24 Oct →
dust29–130.0930%24 Oct →
nuke13–80.1125%18 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0426%18 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0017%18 Oct →
dust211–130.0518%18 Oct →
nuke7–130.0141%16 Oct →
mirage13–110.0420%14 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0318%14 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0418%14 Oct →
dust23–0-0.0213%14 Oct →
inferno13–90.0516%14 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0816%10 Oct →
anubis13–60.0621%10 Oct →
dust26–7-0.076%6 Oct →
mirage13–10.0321%6 Oct →
anubis13–10.0816%6 Oct →
mirage13–50.0522%6 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0232%3 Oct →
mirage16–120.0614%3 Oct →
cache9–130.0226%3 Oct →
inferno0–3-0.0233%30 Sept →
cache13–30.1126%30 Sept →
dust27–130.0223%30 Sept →
cache3–130.000%30 Sept →
dust21–13-0.080%30 Sept →
inferno16–130.1116%27 Sept →
ancient13–70.0119%27 Sept →
dust20–5-0.0625%26 Sept →
anubis13–50.0715%26 Sept →
cache13–110.0814%26 Sept →
dust213–70.1232%26 Sept →
mirage13–90.1317%13 Sept →
mirage13–100.0924%13 Sept →
nuke9–130.009%13 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0335%13 Sept →
nuke13–40.0221%13 Sept →
inferno7–130.0032%8 Sept →
ancient1–60.1033%8 Sept →
train6–130.0423%5 Sept →
cache13–80.0122%5 Sept →
inferno13–1-0.0140%5 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0629%30 Aug →
dust213–90.0614%30 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0430%30 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.048%30 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.069%29 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0271%28 Aug →
mirage13–2-0.0171%28 Aug →
anubis10–130.0417%23 Aug →
dust28–130.0630%23 Aug →
anubis13–60.0021%23 Aug →
nuke13–90.0124%23 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0131%23 Aug →
anubis14–160.0922%19 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.088%19 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0336%19 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0130%15 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0123%15 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0212%15 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0414%15 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0528%12 Aug →
dust213–110.0232%12 Aug →
dust216–140.0110%12 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0235%8 Aug →
dust213–70.0210%7 Aug →
dust213–100.0217%7 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0014%7 Aug →
nuke13–60.0427%7 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.