A 1-8 — CS2 Stats

FI76561198101923219[U:1:141657491]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

735Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,605Hours in CS19Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,999Purple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#17937 of 45426 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,571), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 6 median	Level 7 median	vs Level 7
Headshot rate	37.9%	44.7%	46.1%	8.2% short
Shot accuracy	20.3%	11.9%	12.6%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.90	1.04	1.05	0.15 short
Match win rate	46.3%	45.2%	45.7%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72

Positioning58

Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateWWWWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.2

Aggression8.5

Utility2.8

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels3.8

Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2

Positioning5.8

Utility2.8

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels3.8

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time556ms−47ms

first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms

Headshot accuracy10.8%+0.2%

first ⅓ avg 10.7% → last ⅓ avg 10.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–6

13–0Biggest win — mirage

8Longest win streak

W6Current streak

7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 18% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	37	20–17	54%	0.00
ancient	A	25	16–9	64%	-0.00
nuke	B	15	7–8	47%	-0.00
inferno	D	11	2–9	18%	-0.02
cache	S	8	6–2	75%	0.02
dust2	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

46,656Lifetime kills

0.90K/D

2,046Matches

46.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players

37.9%Headshot %

20.3%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 6 players

4,427MVPs

1,184Hours (in match)

1,787Bombs planted

507Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,874

M4A4 / M4A1-S7,209

AWP6,641

P2000 / USP-S2,520

Desert Eagle2,400

SG 5531,945

AUG1,590

Glock-181,455

Galil AR851

MP9819

Lifetime map wins

3,313train

1,878nuke

1,852inferno

1,596vertigo

802dust2

88cbble

49office

40lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

449Matches

53%Win rate

1.08Avg K/D

93.7ADR

31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

17%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	14	71%	1.41	17.2
Ancient	9	78%	1.55	18.2
Nuke	3	67%	0.90	13.7
Cache	1	100%	3.00	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.6%Headshot accuracy

36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.9%Spray accuracy

81.9%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

550msReaction time

30.9%T opening success

59.3%CT opening success

0.38Enemies flashed / flash

2.1%Flash assists

8.64HE damage / grenade

2.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 10.6331% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3829 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.9007% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–3	0.03	6%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.01	9%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.03	10%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	3%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.06	12%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.03	6%	19 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	5%	18 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	9%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.05	20%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.05	14%	18 Aug →
ancient	16–13	0.00	8%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	13%	16 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.04	11%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–2	-0.01	8%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	7%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.04	7%	16 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.06	6%	14 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.08	9%	12 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.03	18%	12 Aug →
cache	12–10	0.03	6%	12 Aug →
nuke	12–16	-0.02	14%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.06	7%	9 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	10%	7 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.06	12%	6 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.01	23%	6 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	14%	24 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.02	7%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.04	16%	24 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.06	7%	24 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.01	14%	23 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	10%	23 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	12%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.13	25%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	10%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	14%	13 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.03	3%	13 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.03	16%	12 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.03	16%	12 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.01	8%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.06	13%	4 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	8%	12 Jun →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	10%	9 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	20%	2 Jun →
ancient	13–5	-0.04	4%	2 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	4%	27 May →
cache	13–10	0.06	11%	3 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	11%	27 Apr →
ancient	16–12	0.04	11%	17 Apr →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	14%	17 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.00	17%	16 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.00	8%	4 Apr →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	10%	3 Apr →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	13%	3 Apr →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	14%	2 Apr →
ancient	3–13	-0.06	11%	2 Apr →
nuke	13–6	0.03	10%	2 Apr →
inferno	2–13	-0.05	9%	2 Apr →
ancient	11–13	0.03	7%	2 Apr →
mirage	14–16	-0.03	17%	31 Mar →
mirage	13–5	0.05	21%	29 Mar →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	16%	29 Mar →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	13%	29 Mar →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	7%	25 Mar →
mirage	15–15	0.03	11%	22 Mar →
ancient	5–13	-0.00	32%	19 Mar →
nuke	13–3	0.10	23%	19 Mar →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	13%	18 Mar →
mirage	10–13	0.03	8%	18 Mar →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	6%	18 Mar →
mirage	8–13	0.04	21%	17 Mar →
mirage	16–14	0.08	12%	17 Mar →
inferno	13–10	0.01	5%	17 Mar →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	15%	12 Mar →
dust2	14–16	-0.07	14%	8 Mar →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	19%	4 Mar →
mirage	13–5	0.06	16%	4 Mar →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	20%	4 Mar →
mirage	13–2	0.04	8%	4 Mar →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	14%	4 Mar →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	15%	3 Mar →
inferno	13–5	0.01	8%	2 Mar →
mirage	13–5	0.01	3%	2 Mar →
nuke	13–4	0.00	9%	1 Mar →
ancient	13–9	0.04	9%	1 Mar →
mirage	14–16	-0.06	17%	1 Mar →
nuke	13–7	0.07	10%	25 Feb →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	7%	23 Feb →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	4%	23 Feb →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	11%	22 Feb →
mirage	15–15	-0.03	6%	20 Feb →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	7%	16 Feb →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	5%	16 Feb →
inferno	11–13	0.01	7%	16 Feb →
ancient	13–6	-0.02	14%	16 Feb →
mirage	13–6	0.01	18%	15 Feb →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	5%	11 Feb →
mirage	11–13	-0.08	14%	9 Feb →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	10%	9 Feb →
ancient	13–1	-0.02	17%	9 Feb →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	0%	9 Feb →