A 1-8

A 1-8 — CS2 Stats

FI76561198101923219[U:1:141657491]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

809Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,666Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,607Top 50% of 212,910 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#61779 of 259845 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,607 +4,159 2 Jun – 30 Oct · 13 days played
16,58821,725peak 21,7252 Jun30 Oct
21,725Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2026-06-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 118 below peak (21,725)
  • +2,077 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,720 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,393 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate37.8%46.8%48.2%10.4% short
Shot accuracy19.6%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.901.061.070.17 short
Match win rate46.8%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGA 1-8FACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,607 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning72
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–41Last 10059%Win rateLLWWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · −12ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 474ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 474ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 479ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.5
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels5.9
Clutch3.0

Effective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning7.2
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels7.0
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time497ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 497ms
Headshot accuracy12.1%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 11.1% → last ⅓ avg 12.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 13 Jul →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · ancient, 22 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · cache, 24 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 19 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 73% over 11nukeWeakest map · 42% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3623–1364%0.01
ancientA2917–1259%-0.00
nukeC198–1142%-0.01
cacheS118–373%0.02
inferno—31–233%-0.01
dust2—22–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

48,199Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
2,121Matches
46.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
37.8%Headshot %
19.6%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 8 players
4,611MVPs
1,224Hours (in match)
1,848Bombs planted
543Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,313train
2,020nuke
1,868inferno
1,596vertigo
858dust2
88cbble
49office
40lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

518Matches
54%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
83.7ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4670%1.1615.0
Ancient2763%1.3616.7
Nuke1354%1.1220.1
Cache540%1.2315.8
Dust2450%1.2319.8
Inferno1100%0.9018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.9%Headshot accuracy
39.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
81.9%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
487msReaction time
62.6%T opening success
53.6%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
11.3%Flash assists
10.68HE damage / grenade
3.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.8701% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.1416 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.054%2 Nov →
ancient8–13-0.0311%30 Oct →
cache13–20.0412%25 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.029%24 Oct →
cache13–110.0113%24 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0010%24 Oct →
ancient13–80.0712%24 Oct →
nuke19–16-0.029%11 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.028%11 Oct →
mirage10–130.0518%11 Oct →
dust219–16-0.0010%9 Oct →
mirage13–110.0419%4 Oct →
inferno16–140.0112%4 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.017%4 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.029%4 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0314%3 Oct →
ancient13–30.0012%1 Oct →
ancient13–40.0517%1 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.066%30 Sept →
dust213–40.1120%30 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0512%30 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0213%29 Sept →
mirage16–19-0.009%24 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0512%23 Sept →
ancient13–80.028%23 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0110%23 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0112%22 Sept →
ancient13–30.0929%22 Sept →
mirage13–110.0111%21 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0119%21 Sept →
mirage13–30.0914%21 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0511%20 Sept →
mirage13–30.128%13 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0311%13 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.094%9 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.046%8 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0517%8 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.048%8 Sept →
mirage16–130.008%8 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.066%8 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.039%7 Sept →
nuke22–180.0311%7 Sept →
ancient13–50.0514%6 Sept →
ancient16–120.027%5 Sept →
nuke19–160.047%5 Sept →
nuke13–50.1114%5 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0313%5 Sept →
nuke17–190.048%2 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.104%2 Sept →
mirage13–40.0310%2 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0116%2 Sept →
nuke13–60.055%2 Sept →
mirage13–30.0418%1 Sept →
ancient13–30.036%26 Aug →
nuke13–80.019%23 Aug →
ancient13–60.0310%19 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.033%19 Aug →
mirage13–00.0612%19 Aug →
mirage13–10.036%19 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.025%18 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.009%18 Aug →
mirage13–40.0520%18 Aug →
ancient13–10.0514%18 Aug →
ancient16–130.008%17 Aug →
mirage9–130.029%17 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0113%16 Aug →
ancient16–140.0411%16 Aug →
mirage13–2-0.018%16 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.021%16 Aug →
cache13–20.138%16 Aug →
nuke13–110.027%16 Aug →
ancient13–50.047%16 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.066%14 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.089%12 Aug →
cache13–80.0318%12 Aug →
cache12–100.036%12 Aug →
nuke12–16-0.0214%11 Aug →
mirage13–90.067%9 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0710%7 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0612%6 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0123%6 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0514%24 Jul →
cache8–130.027%24 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0416%24 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.067%24 Jul →
cache13–60.0114%23 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0410%23 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0112%13 Jul →
mirage13–60.1325%13 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0310%13 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0214%13 Jul →
cache11–13-0.033%13 Jul →
cache13–90.0316%12 Jul →
cache13–70.0316%12 Jul →
ancient4–130.018%4 Jul →
mirage13–100.0613%4 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.048%12 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0410%9 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0120%2 Jun →
ancient13–5-0.044%2 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.