Pollemiz

Pollemiz — CS2 Stats

DK76561198101588174[U:1:141322446]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,656Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,368Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,448 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 3,656 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 25 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

1,448Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-04-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,448
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 83 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,070), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate40.8%45.7%46.8%6.0% short
Shot accuracy7.8%12.7%13.0%5.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.981.051.060.08 short
Match win rate46.3%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPollemizFACEITLevel 7 · 1,448 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,448csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning46
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4852Last 10048%Win rateWWLLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −3.9pp headshot accuracy · −70ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 615ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility6.1
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.6
Utility6.1
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time640ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 655ms → last ⅓ avg 640ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 26 Apr
39%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · mirage, 15 Jun
461msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · inferno, 1 Sept
13–3Biggest win · nuke, 11 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 15dust2Weakest map · 17% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2213959%-0.00
mirageC1771041%-0.02
ancientB179853%0.00
nukeS1511473%0.01
dust2D1221017%-0.03
overpassC104640%-0.02
anubis32167%-0.03
cache3030%-0.07
office1010%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

103,407Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
5,357Matches
46.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
40.8%Headshot %
7.8%Shot accuracy
14,040MVPs
2,368Hours (in match)
5,424Bombs planted
2,337Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,450
AWP14,590
MP93,360
MAC-103,136
Knife2,840

Lifetime map wins

14,334inferno
9,133nuke
4,303dust2
2,473vertigo
2,119train
470office
101cbble
42lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,436Matches
49%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
77.5ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno57547%1.0315.5
Ancient52751%1.0115.6
Nuke41258%1.0415.9
Anubis38949%0.9815.5
Mirage23339%0.9514.3
Dust218046%0.8914.0
Overpass16252%1.0015.3
Train10854%0.9615.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
74.3%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
635msReaction time
27.4%T opening success
53.4%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
12.57HE damage / grenade
8.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.3621% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–90.0613%1 Sept
nuke13–80.0610%1 Sept
mirage13–160.019%1 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0416%1 Sept
nuke13–70.0226%28 Aug
ancient7–13-0.075%28 Aug
mirage4–13-0.1211%23 Aug
dust27–13-0.0216%23 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0120%23 Aug
ancient13–100.0417%22 Aug
ancient10–130.0515%9 Aug
ancient13–40.0915%9 Aug
dust212–16-0.0218%6 Aug
inferno13–80.0112%5 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0317%4 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0416%26 Jul
mirage7–130.0225%26 Jul
nuke13–90.0121%26 Jul
dust20–13-0.0814%24 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0626%24 Jul
ancient13–80.0112%24 Jul
cache4–13-0.0615%23 Jul
dust218–22-0.0412%21 Jul
mirage13–90.0413%21 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0917%19 Jul
dust23–13-0.085%18 Jul
ancient5–130.0118%11 Jul
nuke13–30.0520%11 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0614%22 Jun
ancient13–160.0020%20 Jun
mirage13–90.0111%19 Jun
inferno13–110.0119%17 Jun
inferno8–130.0031%17 Jun
ancient13–10-0.009%17 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0939%15 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0419%14 Jun
nuke10–130.069%14 Jun
overpass6–9-0.0112%10 Jun
dust26–13-0.1118%9 Jun
inferno13–30.0416%9 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0215%7 Jun
cache7–13-0.0612%5 Jun
mirage13–70.058%5 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0320%4 Jun
ancient17–19-0.0116%3 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0114%3 Jun
dust26–13-0.0025%3 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0314%31 May
anubis13–9-0.0413%31 May
mirage6–13-0.0613%31 May
dust213–30.0116%30 May
nuke8–130.0516%30 May
dust26–130.0132%30 May
overpass11–13-0.0316%25 May
ancient16–13-0.0319%25 May
inferno12–16-0.0017%25 May
overpass16–14-0.0329%22 May
mirage9–13-0.0215%20 May
nuke13–100.0214%19 May
overpass13–100.0219%19 May
inferno13–70.0314%19 May
nuke14–160.0324%19 May
mirage2–13-0.0119%16 May
office4–130.1018%16 May
dust210–13-0.058%16 May
inferno10–13-0.0616%15 May
nuke13–90.0422%15 May
overpass10–130.0318%15 May
inferno11–130.0119%13 May
overpass13–7-0.0718%13 May
ancient10–13-0.0115%13 May
ancient16–14-0.044%13 May
overpass16–19-0.0113%13 May
dust210–13-0.0515%13 May
inferno16–130.0016%10 May
ancient16–12-0.0614%10 May
dust213–70.0624%2 May
ancient6–13-0.0214%1 May
mirage10–13-0.0317%1 May
ancient5–130.0410%1 May
inferno16–14-0.0614%28 Apr
ancient13–60.0816%28 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0413%28 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0226%27 Apr
overpass5–13-0.0427%27 Apr
nuke13–6-0.0223%27 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0228%26 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0114%26 Apr
inferno19–17-0.0115%26 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0119%26 Apr
mirage13–110.0715%26 Apr
overpass13–16-0.0314%26 Apr
inferno13–90.0221%26 Apr
inferno8–130.0213%26 Apr
inferno13–40.1127%26 Apr
cache9–13-0.0911%26 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0116%26 Apr
nuke13–60.007%25 Apr
nuke16–14-0.0519%25 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0518%25 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →