Weho

Weho — CS2 Stats

PL76561198097495752[U:1:137230024]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,058Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,686Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating20,328Top 50% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#79931 of 261673 tracked
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Nov 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,328 +1,246 5 Aug – 11 Nov · 34 days played
18,34921,997peak 21,9975 Aug11 Nov
21,997Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-08-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,669 below peak (21,997)
  • +1,591 over 30 days · improving
  • +481 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,672 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=42,632), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate44.2%46.9%49.3%5.1% short
Shot accuracy16.6%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.061.081.120.07 short
Match win rate49.0%46.7%48.5%meets

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWehoPREMIER20,328 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning64
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD56–41–3Last 10056%Win rateWLLLLLTWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −4.3pp headshot accuracy · −18ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim5.7
Utility6.2
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch6.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 63% on T to 46% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning6.4
Utility6.2
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels6.2
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time606ms+35ms
first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 14 Sept →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · cache, 5 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · dust2, 20 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 22 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 70% over 20dust2Weakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2014–670%0.01
nukeB158–753%0.01
dust2D143–1121%-0.02
mirageS139–469%0.00
cacheS139–469%0.04
infernoB136–746%0.02
anubisA127–558%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

133,071Lifetime kills
1.06K/D
8,175Matches
49.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Pink band
44.2%Headshot %
16.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Pink band
19,778MVPs
2,204Hours (in match)
6,931Bombs planted
1,310Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4736,703
AWP10,166
MAC-104,685
MP94,412
FAMAS3,392

Lifetime map wins

7,384inferno
5,130nuke
4,717dust2
4,665lake
3,208train
2,988vertigo
2,245cbble
319safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

94Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
88.6ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

53%1v1 clutch win
50%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1060%1.1119.1
Anubis633%1.0216.8
Ancient450%1.1421.3
Cache425%0.7113.5
Dust230%0.8720.3
Inferno250%1.0618.5
Nuke1100%1.8018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
68.4%Counter-strafing
12.0°Preaim
591msReaction time
63.4%T opening success
46.0%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
14.8%Flash assists
8.73HE damage / grenade
8.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.0409° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–70.0117%11 Nov →
ancient9–13-0.039%11 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0223%11 Nov →
nuke4–13-0.0014%11 Nov →
anubis7–13-0.0312%5 Nov →
dust29–13-0.0520%5 Nov →
mirage15–150.0311%5 Nov →
nuke16–130.0617%4 Nov →
nuke13–30.0111%4 Nov →
ancient4–13-0.0411%1 Nov →
mirage13–7-0.0215%1 Nov →
cache5–130.0521%30 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0116%29 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0428%29 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.038%29 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0020%29 Oct →
cache13–110.0923%28 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0523%28 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0414%24 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0421%23 Oct →
cache13–10.1218%23 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0027%23 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0517%23 Oct →
dust216–14-0.029%23 Oct →
dust213–40.0115%23 Oct →
mirage9–4-0.0212%23 Oct →
mirage12–16-0.0518%22 Oct →
ancient7–130.0221%22 Oct →
ancient13–100.0319%22 Oct →
mirage13–00.0712%22 Oct →
nuke7–130.0411%21 Oct →
ancient11–10.0323%21 Oct →
nuke13–110.0114%20 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0810%20 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0112%16 Oct →
nuke10–130.0512%15 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0116%15 Oct →
ancient13–00.086%14 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0528%14 Oct →
ancient13–2-0.0220%14 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0616%10 Oct →
dust211–130.0016%10 Oct →
nuke12–16-0.0725%10 Oct →
mirage13–20.0425%10 Oct →
anubis16–14-0.0116%10 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0420%9 Oct →
ancient8–00.0829%9 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0222%7 Oct →
inferno13–50.0215%3 Oct →
cache13–50.0115%1 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0117%1 Oct →
mirage13–110.0529%27 Sept →
inferno10–130.1019%27 Sept →
nuke1–8-0.0415%27 Sept →
inferno13–70.0817%27 Sept →
dust210–130.0318%25 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0323%25 Sept →
dust213–160.0115%25 Sept →
dust213–100.0123%23 Sept →
anubis14–160.0422%14 Sept →
cache13–50.1116%14 Sept →
nuke9–60.0720%14 Sept →
inferno9–30.1418%14 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0618%13 Sept →
cache13–60.0319%13 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.0420%13 Sept →
nuke13–50.0518%28 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0515%26 Aug →
inferno13–30.0114%26 Aug →
cache9–130.1013%26 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0317%21 Aug →
ancient13–70.0526%19 Aug →
inferno11–130.0211%19 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.0416%18 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0120%18 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0517%18 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0326%17 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0521%17 Aug →
inferno13–80.0321%17 Aug →
ancient13–110.1319%17 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0223%17 Aug →
nuke13–40.0625%17 Aug →
anubis13–90.0015%17 Aug →
anubis13–40.0014%17 Aug →
ancient13–90.0224%17 Aug →
anubis13–70.0220%13 Aug →
ancient7–130.0016%9 Aug →
ancient13–90.0120%8 Aug →
mirage13–90.1016%8 Aug →
ancient13–100.0724%8 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0221%8 Aug →
cache14–160.0519%5 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0221%5 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0039%5 Aug →
inferno8–130.0118%3 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0313%3 Aug →
anubis13–70.0411%3 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0119%3 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0126%3 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0217%3 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.