Loma

Loma — CS2 Stats

76561198094045459[U:1:133779731]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

373Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
653Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Aug 2026 (32 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1Tracked matches · now 373
0.0ppWin rate · 37.9% → 37.9%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,744 -17 3 May – 20 Jun · 15 days played
19,62521,060peak 21,0603 May20 Jun
21,411Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-05-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches1——
Win rate0%——
K/D0.81——
Headshot %69%——

Measured 31 Aug 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning48
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY35–64–1Last 10035%Win rateLWWWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 645ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 645ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility3.7
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.8
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time646ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 646ms
Headshot accuracy27.9%−4.1%
first ⅓ avg 32.0% → last ⅓ avg 27.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 6 May →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · dust2, 6 May →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · dust2, 4 May →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 3 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 43% over 14infernoWeakest map · 17% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3514–2140%-0.03
dust2C2810–1836%-0.01
ancientC146–843%-0.03
infernoD122–1017%-0.02
anubisD61–517%-0.01
nuke—32–167%0.00
overpass—10–10%-0.02
cache—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

9,517Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
684Matches
44.9%Match win rate
59.9%Headshot % · Top 5% of tracked players
7.3%Shot accuracy
1,080MVPs
422Hours (in match)
416Bombs planted
175Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,089dust2
982inferno
140nuke
128vertigo
85train
13office
4ar_shoots
2ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

26Matches
54%Win rate
0.75Avg K/D
67.9ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno250%0.9415.5
Dust21100%0.7616.0
Mirage1100%2.0010.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.0%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
637msReaction time
32.4%T opening success
45.0%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
10.83HE damage / grenade
2.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.5196 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.4469% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.0147%24 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0813%28 Jul →
dust213–70.0243%28 Jul →
nuke16–12-0.0029%28 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0429%28 Jul →
mirage16–120.0224%27 Jul →
dust210–130.0332%27 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0214%27 Jul →
mirage16–140.0025%27 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0328%26 Jul →
dust210–130.0624%26 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0222%26 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0631%20 Jul →
ancient16–120.0328%20 Jul →
anubis9–130.0132%20 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0231%20 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0127%20 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0617%20 Jul →
nuke13–60.0322%13 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0230%25 Jun →
mirage15–15-0.0525%20 Jun →
mirage13–8-0.0626%19 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0119%17 May →
ancient13–8-0.0226%17 May →
dust25–130.0434%16 May →
mirage7–13-0.0223%15 May →
ancient9–13-0.0527%15 May →
dust210–13-0.0030%15 May →
dust25–13-0.0337%15 May →
anubis7–13-0.0221%14 May →
ancient7–13-0.0231%14 May →
dust26–13-0.0044%14 May →
dust25–13-0.0030%14 May →
ancient6–13-0.0619%12 May →
ancient9–13-0.0543%11 May →
anubis5–13-0.0427%11 May →
mirage6–13-0.0642%11 May →
inferno13–6-0.0243%11 May →
ancient13–11-0.0631%11 May →
dust216–130.0230%9 May →
inferno5–130.0640%9 May →
mirage3–13-0.0135%9 May →
dust213–11-0.0835%8 May →
mirage4–13-0.0516%8 May →
mirage9–13-0.0236%8 May →
mirage13–7-0.0022%8 May →
mirage5–13-0.0626%7 May →
dust24–13-0.0741%7 May →
mirage13–4-0.0627%7 May →
mirage13–60.0037%7 May →
dust210–130.0531%7 May →
dust213–20.0439%7 May →
dust213–9-0.0428%7 May →
mirage13–11-0.0254%6 May →
inferno4–13-0.0450%6 May →
ancient9–6-0.0130%6 May →
inferno5–13-0.0429%6 May →
dust213–80.0936%6 May →
inferno14–16-0.0323%6 May →
mirage10–13-0.0141%6 May →
ancient9–13-0.0728%6 May →
dust20–13-0.0556%6 May →
mirage13–60.1129%6 May →
dust27–13-0.0529%6 May →
inferno13–7-0.0133%6 May →
mirage13–11-0.0831%5 May →
dust24–13-0.0626%5 May →
nuke6–13-0.0333%5 May →
ancient11–13-0.0130%5 May →
mirage4–13-0.0616%5 May →
mirage5–13-0.0417%5 May →
mirage5–13-0.1123%5 May →
dust28–130.0154%5 May →
ancient10–13-0.0539%5 May →
dust213–8-0.0635%5 May →
ancient16–130.0141%5 May →
mirage11–13-0.0746%5 May →
mirage6–13-0.0818%5 May →
mirage6–13-0.1228%4 May →
mirage16–13-0.0229%4 May →
mirage13–40.0131%4 May →
overpass8–13-0.0218%4 May →
dust25–13-0.0239%4 May →
dust213–4-0.0328%4 May →
dust24–13-0.0226%3 May →
mirage7–13-0.0432%3 May →
anubis13–00.0429%3 May →
inferno2–13-0.0532%3 May →
ancient9–13-0.0423%3 May →
dust28–130.0125%3 May →
mirage13–90.0344%3 May →
ancient7–10.0229%3 May →
mirage13–70.0132%3 May →
inferno5–13-0.0647%3 May →
dust22–130.0150%3 May →
inferno11–13-0.0522%3 May →
dust25–130.0236%3 May →
mirage10–13-0.0121%2 May →
inferno2–130.0138%2 May →
cache4–13-0.0647%2 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.