Nitro

Nitro — CS2 Stats

FI76561198093891507[U:1:133625779]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

257Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,036Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidClutch Specialist
CSDB Leaderboard#85575 of 232317 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 6 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,359 +4,418 6 Mar23 Jun · 32 days played
14,94120,109peak 20,1096 Mar23 Jun
20,499Peak Premier in tracked matches
45Days played since 2026-03-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning63
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48448Last 10048%Win rateLWLWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +6.7pp headshot accuracy · −80ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+3.8 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility3.7
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch10.0

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 615ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.3
Utility3.7
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time613ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–8 · inferno, 30 Mar
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · nuke, 30 Mar
266msFastest reaction time · 3–0 · nuke, 30 Mar
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 6 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 70% over 10anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA26161062%0.01
infernoD2371630%0.01
nukeA169756%0.02
ancientA116555%-0.02
overpassS107370%-0.00
cacheD51420%-0.02
anubisD5050%-0.03
dust242250%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

67,342Lifetime kills
1.05K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
3,094Matches
38.8%Match win rate
33.8%Headshot %
19.9%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of tracked players
6,198MVPs
1,262Hours (in match)
2,943Bombs planted
664Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,452
AWP14,602
P902,193
SSG 081,904
P2501,202

Lifetime map wins

7,138dust2
5,689nuke
2,272inferno
900train
334cbble
315vertigo
115office
32lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

19Matches
37%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
60.6ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
100%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno10%0.6511.0
Anubis10%1.2123.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
42.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.2%Spray accuracy
88.0%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
615msReaction time
36.2%T opening success
51.7%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
11.66HE damage / grenade
3.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4192 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.1793% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.0021%14 Sept
nuke13–10.0120%14 Sept
dust23–13-0.0124%10 Sept
mirage13–40.1518%10 Sept
inferno5–13-0.065%10 Sept
nuke11–130.0623%9 Sept
mirage7–130.0425%1 Sept
nuke13–60.1021%1 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0619%31 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0220%11 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0115%22 Jul
mirage7–13-0.009%22 Jul
cache2–13-0.0513%22 Jul
cache13–16-0.029%15 Jul
inferno13–80.0613%15 Jul
cache13–10-0.0218%13 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0216%23 Jun
mirage13–11-0.018%23 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0216%22 Jun
nuke13–90.0013%22 Jun
overpass13–30.018%7 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0124%7 Jun
mirage4–130.0113%4 Jun
inferno6–130.0212%2 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0613%2 Jun
nuke8–130.0424%29 May
inferno6–13-0.0311%23 May
mirage13–90.0015%23 May
ancient1–13-0.0813%20 May
nuke13–20.0616%19 May
dust25–13-0.0722%9 May
mirage5–13-0.0327%9 May
cache12–120.0525%8 May
inferno7–130.0820%8 May
cache2–13-0.0518%29 Apr
nuke11–130.0420%24 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0429%23 Apr
inferno5–130.0817%23 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0415%22 Apr
overpass7–130.0016%22 Apr
mirage15–150.0212%22 Apr
anubis5–13-0.069%22 Apr
nuke13–30.0025%22 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0130%22 Apr
nuke8–10.060%21 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0519%20 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0615%20 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0221%17 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0619%15 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0314%14 Apr
mirage13–90.0618%12 Apr
inferno5–13-0.036%12 Apr
overpass9–130.0219%11 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0114%11 Apr
inferno0–13-0.1010%11 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0014%8 Apr
inferno5–00.0725%8 Apr
mirage13–110.0223%31 Mar
inferno9–3-0.0119%31 Mar
ancient16–130.0111%31 Mar
mirage13–100.0025%31 Mar
inferno10–13-0.058%31 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0330%31 Mar
overpass13–70.0242%31 Mar
anubis14–16-0.0515%30 Mar
nuke3–00.0450%30 Mar
inferno15–15-0.0720%30 Mar
overpass13–9-0.078%30 Mar
ancient13–80.0613%30 Mar
ancient15–15-0.0117%30 Mar
inferno13–80.1720%30 Mar
nuke13–80.0417%27 Mar
ancient13–100.0122%26 Mar
ancient13–5-0.0319%25 Mar
inferno15–150.0516%25 Mar
inferno10–130.0826%20 Mar
dust213–4-0.0918%18 Mar
mirage13–80.016%18 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0512%18 Mar
mirage13–70.0620%13 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0213%13 Mar
inferno15–150.0219%13 Mar
mirage13–60.0537%12 Mar
overpass13–70.0618%12 Mar
mirage15–15-0.0323%12 Mar
anubis6–130.0340%12 Mar
overpass13–9-0.0220%10 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0421%10 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0217%9 Mar
mirage13–60.1315%9 Mar
nuke13–5-0.0411%7 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0133%7 Mar
dust213–7-0.0313%7 Mar
overpass13–80.0212%7 Mar
nuke15–150.0319%7 Mar
mirage13–80.0221%6 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0023%6 Mar
inferno16–130.0212%6 Mar
mirage13–0-0.0210%6 Mar
inferno13–40.0428%6 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →