Pharaoz

Pharaoz — CS2 Stats

FK76561198093808362[U:1:133542634]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,333Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,133Top 50% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#97585 of 259896 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,282 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (41 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,333 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,133 +1,631 22 Dec – 24 Sept · 25 days played
17,50219,482peak 19,48222 Dec24 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,282 +0 30 Aug – 24 Sept · 4 observations
2,2822,282peak 2,28230 Aug24 Sept
19,482Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,282Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
60Days played since 2023-12-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,282
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 218 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 349 below peak (19,482)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 867 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPharaozFACEITLevel 10 · 2,282 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER19,133 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,282csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning61
Utility12

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–54–1Last 10045%Win rateWLWLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 656ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility1.2
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels6.1
Clutch3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 638ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning6.1
Utility1.2
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time643ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 643ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%−5.2%
first ⅓ avg 26.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 8–13 · overpass, 8 Feb →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · overpass, 28 Jan →
453msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · vertigo, 25 Dec →
13–3Biggest win · nuke, 18 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
8–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 56% over 25infernoWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA2514–1156%0.02
nukeB2412–1250%0.04
overpassA2212–1055%0.03
vertigoC166–1038%0.04
infernoD60–60%0.01
ancient—41–325%-0.03
train—20–20%-0.04
mirage—10–10%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,382Matches
50%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
88.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke8558%1.2518.2
Anubis8048%1.2719.0
Vertigo4659%1.5119.6
Ancient4540%1.1717.3
Inferno3540%1.2218.2
Overpass3148%1.1618.6
Mirage743%1.1215.3
Train743%1.0414.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
84.4%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
638msReaction time
43.2%T opening success
55.5%CT opening success
0.28Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
12.98HE damage / grenade
1.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2837 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–100.0625%14 Feb →
train4–13-0.1113%21 Nov →
overpass13–70.0113%16 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0513%8 Aug →
train11–130.0218%7 Aug →
anubis13–110.0924%24 May →
nuke7–130.0236%4 Apr →
ancient3–13-0.0814%4 Apr →
nuke13–100.0123%7 Feb →
inferno3–13-0.0722%5 Jan →
anubis4–13-0.0029%28 Dec →
nuke13–9-0.0418%16 Nov →
nuke8–13-0.0614%8 Nov →
vertigo13–110.0417%7 Nov →
anubis6–13-0.0520%7 Nov →
nuke13–11-0.0029%22 Oct →
overpass13–60.1124%15 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0723%12 Oct →
inferno7–130.0013%11 Oct →
anubis16–120.0224%6 Oct →
anubis16–12-0.0227%29 Sept →
vertigo13–160.0111%25 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0025%22 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0118%4 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0223%4 Aug →
anubis13–90.0224%4 Aug →
inferno6–130.0519%28 Jul →
nuke13–40.0819%13 Jul →
nuke13–110.0527%3 Jul →
inferno10–130.0528%3 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0318%3 Jul →
nuke13–110.0431%13 Jun →
overpass8–13-0.018%23 Apr →
anubis13–90.0834%13 Apr →
nuke13–60.0622%3 Apr →
overpass13–100.0816%1 Apr →
overpass13–110.0325%5 Mar →
overpass5–13-0.0431%20 Feb →
anubis7–13-0.0232%20 Feb →
anubis13–100.0420%19 Feb →
nuke13–30.1422%18 Feb →
nuke11–130.0726%17 Feb →
ancient13–60.0133%17 Feb →
vertigo10–130.0324%17 Feb →
inferno2–13-0.0326%16 Feb →
vertigo16–120.0826%16 Feb →
vertigo13–80.0928%16 Feb →
overpass13–90.1131%16 Feb →
anubis11–130.0927%16 Feb →
anubis5–13-0.0610%15 Feb →
overpass13–100.0429%13 Feb →
nuke13–80.1228%12 Feb →
anubis14–160.0024%12 Feb →
vertigo13–70.0919%12 Feb →
inferno9–130.0525%12 Feb →
vertigo11–13-0.0027%12 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.0539%12 Feb →
overpass8–130.1522%8 Feb →
vertigo8–110.0121%8 Feb →
vertigo5–130.0222%7 Feb →
nuke8–130.0325%7 Feb →
overpass17–190.0526%6 Feb →
overpass13–9-0.0523%5 Feb →
anubis13–100.0434%5 Feb →
vertigo13–70.0420%5 Feb →
overpass10–13-0.0119%4 Feb →
nuke16–130.0327%2 Feb →
nuke11–130.0325%1 Feb →
overpass13–70.1136%1 Feb →
overpass8–13-0.0120%29 Jan →
nuke13–160.0526%28 Jan →
anubis13–70.1223%28 Jan →
overpass11–13-0.0040%28 Jan →
anubis13–110.0329%28 Jan →
ancient7–13-0.0730%27 Jan →
anubis8–13-0.0532%27 Jan →
anubis13–10-0.0131%22 Jan →
nuke13–50.0629%22 Jan →
overpass8–130.0317%19 Jan →
nuke10–13-0.0318%19 Jan →
nuke6–130.0634%19 Jan →
overpass13–9-0.0711%18 Jan →
vertigo13–60.0335%16 Jan →
nuke13–50.0526%16 Jan →
vertigo9–130.0927%16 Jan →
nuke9–130.0924%15 Jan →
overpass10–13-0.0224%6 Jan →
nuke7–130.0834%2 Jan →
overpass11–130.0725%2 Jan →
vertigo5–130.0518%2 Jan →
vertigo9–13-0.0336%28 Dec →
nuke8–130.0421%28 Dec →
vertigo15–150.0215%26 Dec →
overpass13–70.1320%26 Dec →
vertigo11–130.0721%25 Dec →
anubis13–60.1232%25 Dec →
anubis13–50.1332%25 Dec →
overpass13–80.0115%22 Dec →
overpass13–5-0.0236%22 Dec →
anubis10–130.0717%22 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.