Hycynthnopeen M.M ✡

Hycynthnopeen M.M ✡ — CS2 Stats

76561198091684891[U:1:131419163]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,316Tracked matches52%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,941Hours in CS148Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,073Blue band · top ~43.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−619Premier CS Rating · 12,692 → 12,073

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,073 +3,469 22 Oct – 5 Nov · 12 days played
8,60413,761peak 13,76122 Oct5 Nov
14,072Peak Premier in tracked matches
13Days played since 2026-10-21

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,688 below peak (13,761)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,927 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate37.9%42.7%43.8%5.8% short
Shot accuracy12.0%11.2%12.0%meets
Kill/death ratio1.000.991.020.02 short
Match win rate48.1%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHycynthnopeen M.M ✡FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER12,073 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning57
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD57–38–5Last 10057%Win rateLLLLLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −6.1pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.0
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch0.0

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 29% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.7
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time571ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%+3.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 27 Oct →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 28 Oct →
422msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 30 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 27 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L5Current streak
6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 13dust2Weakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA1811–761%0.04
mirageA1810–856%0.03
cacheS1711–665%0.02
dust2C145–936%0.03
anubisB137–654%0.05
nukeS139–469%0.03
ancientA74–357%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

32,417Lifetime kills
1.00K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
2,337Matches
48.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
37.9%Headshot %
12.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
4,005MVPs
757Hours (in match)
1,703Bombs planted
527Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,703dust2
3,272nuke
2,239inferno
1,132vertigo
67train
33lake
21office
20cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches
67%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
74.9ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust210%0.8113.0
Inferno1100%1.0014.0
Mirage1100%1.1023.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
564msReaction time
57.1%T opening success
29.5%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
6.72HE damage / grenade
9.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 29.4629% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–130.0113%5 Nov →
inferno14–16-0.0513%5 Nov →
inferno7–130.0818%5 Nov →
anubis9–130.0910%5 Nov →
mirage3–130.0516%5 Nov →
anubis13–70.1136%5 Nov →
anubis13–30.078%5 Nov →
inferno2–9-0.028%4 Nov →
nuke11–130.0313%2 Nov →
dust213–80.0111%2 Nov →
mirage15–15-0.0027%2 Nov →
mirage13–60.0518%1 Nov →
cache8–130.0116%1 Nov →
cache16–130.0415%1 Nov →
cache13–80.0817%1 Nov →
cache13–6-0.0112%1 Nov →
cache13–20.0923%1 Nov →
anubis13–100.1420%1 Nov →
nuke6–130.0136%1 Nov →
inferno13–70.0821%1 Nov →
ancient8–13-0.0117%1 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0114%1 Nov →
mirage13–8-0.0021%1 Nov →
mirage10–130.0233%1 Nov →
mirage13–11-0.0116%1 Nov →
anubis13–9-0.0118%31 Oct →
cache13–20.0222%31 Oct →
nuke11–130.0019%31 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0226%31 Oct →
cache13–100.0525%31 Oct →
mirage7–130.0415%31 Oct →
nuke13–60.1318%31 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0116%31 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0122%31 Oct →
dust213–70.1320%31 Oct →
dust213–40.0421%31 Oct →
mirage13–30.0515%31 Oct →
mirage13–50.1216%31 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0114%31 Oct →
dust216–140.0117%31 Oct →
ancient13–100.047%31 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0316%31 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0614%30 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0515%30 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0118%30 Oct →
inferno15–150.0416%30 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0811%30 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0627%30 Oct →
inferno8–130.0422%30 Oct →
ancient13–100.0512%30 Oct →
inferno13–110.0820%30 Oct →
ancient13–80.0422%29 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0113%29 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0033%29 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0119%28 Oct →
nuke13–30.1616%28 Oct →
mirage3–130.0038%28 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0723%28 Oct →
nuke13–60.0113%28 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.028%28 Oct →
dust215–150.009%28 Oct →
mirage13–70.0313%28 Oct →
cache16–140.0220%27 Oct →
anubis13–40.0522%27 Oct →
inferno13–50.068%27 Oct →
dust210–130.0914%27 Oct →
inferno13–90.0726%27 Oct →
mirage13–10.1711%27 Oct →
nuke8–130.0016%27 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0111%27 Oct →
anubis5–100.0919%24 Oct →
inferno13–40.075%24 Oct →
mirage13–90.1017%24 Oct →
cache12–16-0.0021%24 Oct →
dust27–130.0121%24 Oct →
anubis9–130.0310%24 Oct →
ancient13–50.0611%24 Oct →
cache11–130.0414%23 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0020%23 Oct →
mirage10–130.0110%23 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0118%23 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0412%23 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.019%23 Oct →
anubis7–130.0211%23 Oct →
ancient15–150.0115%23 Oct →
nuke13–60.0112%23 Oct →
inferno13–90.0817%22 Oct →
dust211–130.1514%22 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0117%22 Oct →
cache13–60.0823%22 Oct →
anubis13–100.027%22 Oct →
dust29–130.0018%22 Oct →
anubis9–130.0114%22 Oct →
anubis13–80.0317%22 Oct →
cache13–70.039%21 Oct →
inferno13–100.1619%21 Oct →
inferno13–80.0615%21 Oct →
cache13–110.0719%21 Oct →
inferno13–90.1318%21 Oct →
nuke13–110.0816%21 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.