Grippy T

Grippy T — CS2 Stats

GB76561198091660312[U:1:131394584]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,604Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,477Hours in CS47Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,977Top 25% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#42006 of 251271 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,327 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,977 +3,488 5 Sept – 10 Oct · 10 days played
19,48922,977peak 22,9775 Sept10 Oct
22,977Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,327Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-09-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,327
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 24 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,977
  • +1,590 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,023 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,885), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate64.1%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy0.8%12.7%13.0%12.2% short
Kill/death ratio1.181.051.06above
Match win rate44.9%45.7%46.3%1.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGrippy TFACEITLevel 7 · 1,327 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,977 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,327csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning73
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateLWLWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −6.6pp headshot accuracy · −84ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility6.1
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels6.9
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 557ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning7.3
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels8.2
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time560ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 24.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 4–0 · inferno, 19 Sept →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 1–9 · mirage, 8 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · dust2, 10 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2313–1057%0.04
anubisC167–944%0.06
nukeB136–746%0.03
cacheB137–654%0.02
ancientB126–650%0.04
mirageB126–650%0.02
infernoS96–367%0.08
eldorado—10–10%0.07
office—11–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

74,388Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players
2,686Matches
44.9%Match win rate
64.1%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 7 players
0.8%Shot accuracy
6,522MVPs
2,436Hours (in match)
3,119Bombs planted
1,039Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,731dust2
3,318inferno
3,036nuke
978train
338vertigo
145office
17italy
10lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

505Matches
48%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
74.6ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15045%1.0114.5
Inferno7355%1.2614.7
Nuke6957%1.2316.4
Dust26555%1.1314.5
Ancient5535%1.0915.1
Anubis5340%1.1915.8
Overpass2442%1.1515.3
Train1362%1.0916.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.0%Spray accuracy
83.0%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
557msReaction time
65.5%T opening success
59.8%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
9.1%Flash assists
8.21HE damage / grenade
15.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–130.0819%11 Oct →
anubis13–30.0426%11 Oct →
nuke7–90.0113%11 Oct →
anubis13–10.1121%11 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0222%10 Oct →
dust213–2-0.020%10 Oct →
ancient13–20.0222%10 Oct →
anubis6–130.0924%9 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0116%8 Oct →
dust213–30.1131%8 Oct →
eldorado6–90.0728%8 Oct →
anubis9–130.1330%7 Oct →
ancient6–130.0219%7 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0028%7 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0413%7 Oct →
inferno13–80.0921%6 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.0136%5 Oct →
dust213–90.1225%5 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0028%5 Oct →
nuke13–110.0432%4 Oct →
mirage13–10.0520%4 Oct →
dust213–90.0324%4 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0121%4 Oct →
anubis6–130.0518%3 Oct →
cache3–130.0319%3 Oct →
ancient13–90.0421%3 Oct →
ancient13–70.0618%3 Oct →
anubis11–130.0831%2 Oct →
inferno13–70.1730%2 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0321%2 Oct →
mirage13–30.0319%2 Oct →
dust213–1-0.0310%1 Oct →
ancient6–130.0920%1 Oct →
dust24–130.0240%1 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0520%30 Sept →
cache0–70.0325%30 Sept →
nuke16–13-0.0122%29 Sept →
inferno13–110.0531%29 Sept →
nuke13–70.0313%29 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0539%28 Sept →
anubis13–40.0428%28 Sept →
dust25–8-0.050%27 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0036%27 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0022%27 Sept →
ancient11–130.0414%27 Sept →
mirage13–40.1117%27 Sept →
nuke5–130.0731%27 Sept →
dust213–10.0730%27 Sept →
anubis10–130.0130%26 Sept →
cache5–130.0226%26 Sept →
cache13–80.0032%26 Sept →
mirage11–130.0123%25 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0119%25 Sept →
dust213–50.0321%25 Sept →
dust210–130.0938%20 Sept →
mirage12–120.1336%20 Sept →
cache13–60.0436%20 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0019%19 Sept →
anubis12–120.1128%19 Sept →
dust213–80.0830%19 Sept →
inferno4–00.2025%19 Sept →
nuke10–130.1322%18 Sept →
dust29–130.1215%18 Sept →
ancient13–80.0422%18 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0123%18 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0318%18 Sept →
anubis13–70.1530%17 Sept →
nuke13–80.0219%17 Sept →
dust29–9-0.0025%15 Sept →
cache13–50.0925%15 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0718%14 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0424%13 Sept →
dust26–130.0226%13 Sept →
dust213–60.0518%13 Sept →
mirage13–110.017%12 Sept →
dust213–80.1237%11 Sept →
anubis13–30.0419%11 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0313%10 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0118%10 Sept →
nuke13–50.1325%10 Sept →
mirage1–9-0.0960%8 Sept →
inferno11–130.1029%8 Sept →
office13–9-0.036%8 Sept →
mirage13–110.0223%7 Sept →
anubis7–130.0818%7 Sept →
ancient13–90.0716%7 Sept →
anubis16–130.0424%6 Sept →
cache13–40.0126%6 Sept →
dust213–80.1033%6 Sept →
mirage5–130.0219%6 Sept →
inferno6–130.1416%5 Sept →
anubis13–60.1341%5 Sept →
cache12–120.0321%5 Sept →
mirage13–90.0023%4 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0321%4 Sept →
nuke13–110.0627%4 Sept →
ancient13–30.0921%4 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0132%4 Sept →
cache13–80.0530%3 Sept →
dust213–90.1138%3 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.