Timo Tiikeri

Timo Tiikeri — CS2 Stats

76561198090673285[U:1:130407557]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,960Tracked matches27%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,344Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (22 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,960 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 22 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,395 -2,495 22 Nov17 Jan · 21 days played
7,02811,302peak 11,30222 Nov17 Jan
11,302Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,133Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2025-11-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,407), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate33.5%42.7%43.8%10.3% short
Shot accuracy14.4%11.3%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.920.991.020.10 short
Match win rate45.2%43.9%44.7%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTimo TiikeriFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,133csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning44
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY31681Last 10031%Win rateWLLWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · +59ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 856ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 827ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 798ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim4.2
Utility4.8
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 17% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 757ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning4.4
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time772ms+10ms
first ⅓ avg 763ms → last ⅓ avg 772ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%+5.5%
first ⅓ avg 11.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 26 Dec
36%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · nuke, 25 Jul
438msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · nuke, 7 Jan
9–0Biggest win · nuke, 25 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
153In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 42% over 19dust2Weakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2391439%-0.03
ancientC1981142%-0.02
nukeC135838%-0.02
overpassD134931%-0.02
dust2D102820%-0.06
mirageD82625%-0.04
cacheD51420%-0.06
train4040%-0.03
anubis3030%-0.02
debris1010%-0.04
office1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

71,419Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
4,066Matches
45.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
33.5%Headshot %
14.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
7,937MVPs
1,825Hours (in match)
4,638Bombs planted
688Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,417
AWP8,748
MAC-102,395
MP91,824
FAMAS1,562

Lifetime map wins

11,376inferno
5,285nuke
3,558dust2
2,766vertigo
1,468train
452office
58cbble
12italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

883Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
64.9ADR
29%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6248%0.9714.0
Ancient5655%0.9714.9
Nuke5163%0.9513.4
Overpass3658%1.0414.8
Anubis3444%0.9713.5
Dust22752%0.9214.4
Mirage2536%0.6811.3
Vertigo1258%1.1916.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.4%Spray accuracy
84.9%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
757msReaction time
17.0%T opening success
37.8%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
9.39HE damage / grenade
7.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 757.2133ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.0244% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–110.0014%25 Jul
inferno8–13-0.067%25 Jul
nuke4–13-0.046%25 Jul
inferno9–60.1217%25 Jul
debris3–9-0.0418%25 Jul
nuke9–00.1836%25 Jul
cache7–13-0.0312%24 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0313%24 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0119%24 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0210%23 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0313%23 Jul
cache12–16-0.0612%23 Jul
ancient13–16-0.038%23 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0736%23 Jul
cache5–13-0.088%18 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0813%18 Jul
office5–13-0.0633%18 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0335%18 Jul
dust23–13-0.1211%18 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0428%18 Jul
cache3–13-0.107%18 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0228%18 Jul
cache13–11-0.0123%18 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0223%18 Jul
inferno21–25-0.0316%3 Jul
anubis7–130.0314%3 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0416%3 Jul
nuke5–9-0.1829%3 Jul
dust210–13-0.0616%26 Jun
overpass13–110.029%26 Jun
ancient13–70.0414%5 Apr
overpass5–13-0.065%3 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0513%3 Apr
dust28–13-0.1013%13 Feb
anubis6–13-0.066%13 Feb
ancient13–10-0.078%13 Feb
inferno10–13-0.086%13 Feb
inferno3–13-0.0213%6 Feb
dust28–13-0.086%6 Feb
anubis6–13-0.057%24 Jan
inferno16–14-0.026%24 Jan
mirage2–13-0.076%24 Jan
inferno7–13-0.1128%17 Jan
ancient13–9-0.044%17 Jan
nuke5–13-0.0819%17 Jan
nuke13–16-0.0920%16 Jan
dust216–14-0.078%16 Jan
overpass13–110.0211%16 Jan
inferno14–16-0.045%9 Jan
mirage8–13-0.033%9 Jan
dust22–13-0.0911%9 Jan
nuke13–4-0.016%7 Jan
overpass8–13-0.067%7 Jan
dust23–13-0.067%7 Jan
train15–15-0.005%6 Jan
overpass7–130.0514%6 Jan
nuke9–13-0.0217%3 Jan
overpass5–13-0.0111%3 Jan
ancient9–130.0118%3 Jan
dust211–13-0.0520%2 Jan
ancient13–110.0010%2 Jan
inferno13–50.0213%2 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0623%26 Dec
ancient13–40.1913%26 Dec
overpass4–13-0.074%23 Dec
inferno13–11-0.0411%23 Dec
ancient3–13-0.0413%23 Dec
nuke10–13-0.0312%23 Dec
dust213–16-0.0211%21 Dec
nuke7–130.0210%17 Dec
ancient13–90.0011%17 Dec
ancient4–13-0.0711%13 Dec
ancient3–13-0.0618%13 Dec
nuke16–14-0.0312%12 Dec
train5–13-0.0412%12 Dec
overpass8–13-0.037%12 Dec
ancient10–13-0.058%12 Dec
inferno9–13-0.028%6 Dec
train2–13-0.0333%6 Dec
nuke5–13-0.059%6 Dec
ancient8–13-0.037%6 Dec
overpass6–13-0.048%6 Dec
inferno16–14-0.0014%5 Dec
overpass8–13-0.035%5 Dec
inferno6–13-0.0321%5 Dec
nuke13–8-0.0013%5 Dec
inferno4–13-0.0916%2 Dec
inferno7–13-0.059%1 Dec
mirage0–13-0.0510%1 Dec
train6–13-0.0510%1 Dec
dust213–110.0213%1 Dec
inferno13–110.0516%1 Dec
ancient4–13-0.0719%1 Dec
nuke13–110.036%30 Nov
overpass13–6-0.037%29 Nov
inferno13–11-0.033%29 Nov
overpass6–13-0.0219%23 Nov
ancient11–13-0.058%22 Nov
overpass13–6-0.025%22 Nov
mirage13–60.007%22 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →