Wave

Wave — CS2 Stats

FI76561199084037371[U:1:1123771643]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,829Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,834Top 25% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#31580 of 238921 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,137 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 12 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,834 +409 12 Aug16 Sept · 28 days played
21,08424,841peak 24,84112 Aug16 Sept
24,990Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,137Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-08-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,137
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 363 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,007 below peak (24,841)
  • +2,108 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,166 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWaveFACEITLevel 9 · 2,137 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,834 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,137csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning58
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47521Last 10047%Win rateLWLWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · −150ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility6.1
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch4.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.8
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time584ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms
Headshot accuracy25.6%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 27.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 13–11 · inferno, 19 Aug
59%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · dust2, 3 Sept
453msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · cache, 3 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 3 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
128In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 73% over 11anubisWeakest map · 0% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC2081240%0.03
ancientB179853%0.00
nukeB179853%0.03
dust2B178947%0.00
mirageS118373%0.03
anubisD8080%0.00
overpassA53260%0.07
cache42250%-0.03
train1010%0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,373Matches
52%Win rate
1.35Avg K/D
89.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno12854%1.3418.3
Nuke12765%1.4018.4
Ancient10751%1.2417.6
Dust28944%1.2217.8
Anubis8252%1.2117.1
Mirage5737%1.1417.5
Overpass4464%1.3418.8
Vertigo4151%1.2617.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.1%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
84.8%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
579msReaction time
36.7%T opening success
45.1%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
10.38HE damage / grenade
4.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.6994% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass4–13-0.0529%22 Sept
inferno13–110.1323%22 Sept
mirage8–130.1219%22 Sept
ancient13–100.0530%16 Sept
ancient3–130.0019%15 Sept
nuke16–140.0315%12 Sept
inferno14–160.0826%11 Sept
anubis8–130.0427%11 Sept
inferno13–50.1230%11 Sept
nuke8–130.0623%9 Sept
anubis3–130.0030%9 Sept
nuke13–90.0524%8 Sept
inferno11–130.0025%8 Sept
ancient13–30.0326%7 Sept
nuke13–70.0220%4 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0017%4 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0319%4 Sept
nuke10–130.0131%4 Sept
ancient11–130.1123%4 Sept
dust213–110.0332%4 Sept
ancient13–100.0533%4 Sept
ancient1–5-0.0140%4 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0333%3 Sept
mirage13–90.0216%3 Sept
dust213–10.0159%3 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0533%3 Sept
cache3–13-0.0515%3 Sept
ancient13–40.0520%3 Sept
mirage13–160.0230%3 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0132%2 Sept
dust27–130.0015%2 Sept
anubis9–130.0116%2 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0213%2 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0528%2 Sept
ancient4–130.0035%2 Sept
mirage16–12-0.0417%2 Sept
dust210–13-0.0029%2 Sept
nuke13–70.0920%1 Sept
ancient13–110.0128%1 Sept
inferno13–160.0436%1 Sept
cache13–6-0.0321%1 Sept
cache8–13-0.0417%1 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0622%31 Aug
anubis9–130.0132%31 Aug
nuke8–130.0135%31 Aug
mirage16–130.0631%31 Aug
dust213–11-0.0016%31 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0313%30 Aug
dust26–130.0835%30 Aug
mirage13–50.0724%30 Aug
nuke13–100.0129%30 Aug
inferno16–120.0629%28 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0321%28 Aug
dust213–40.0226%28 Aug
mirage13–110.0724%27 Aug
anubis5–130.0218%26 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0317%26 Aug
inferno6–130.0310%26 Aug
nuke13–60.0833%26 Aug
dust24–13-0.0437%26 Aug
nuke13–30.1028%26 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0219%25 Aug
dust215–15-0.0321%24 Aug
mirage13–60.1029%24 Aug
dust213–50.0134%24 Aug
train6–130.1533%23 Aug
mirage13–20.0232%23 Aug
overpass13–30.0746%23 Aug
cache13–30.0130%22 Aug
inferno3–13-0.1014%22 Aug
dust213–110.0122%22 Aug
dust213–10.0624%21 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0415%21 Aug
inferno3–9-0.0435%19 Aug
inferno13–110.2725%19 Aug
inferno13–80.0630%19 Aug
ancient11–130.0411%19 Aug
nuke13–40.0136%19 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0220%18 Aug
dust211–13-0.0624%18 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0153%18 Aug
ancient1–10-0.0633%18 Aug
inferno13–110.0233%17 Aug
inferno8–130.0424%17 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0421%17 Aug
dust211–130.0122%16 Aug
overpass11–130.1325%16 Aug
overpass13–70.1225%16 Aug
nuke8–130.0211%15 Aug
dust27–13-0.0818%15 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0321%15 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0824%15 Aug
nuke13–60.0331%15 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0335%14 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0434%14 Aug
dust29–13-0.0223%14 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0432%13 Aug
dust216–140.0025%12 Aug
overpass13–40.0932%12 Aug
inferno11–130.0541%12 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →