Baggemus — CS2 Stats

76561198088804618[U:1:128538890]

668Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
841Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning52
Utility26

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47467Last 10047%Win rateLWLLLLLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.08 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression6.7
Utility2.6
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.2
Utility2.6
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time598ms+30ms
first ⅓ avg 568ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — inferno 9–1
133Biggest win — ancient
8Longest win streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC52232944%-0.03
ancientC125742%-0.00
nukeA116555%0.01
anubisS118373%-0.01
mirageD51420%-0.03
cacheC52340%-0.00
dust221150%-0.03
vertigo110100%0.03
overpass1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

20,559Lifetime kills
0.80K/D
1,428Matches
35.5%Match win rate
42.7%Headshot %
8.7%Shot accuracy
1,965MVPs
404Hours (in match)
985Bombs planted
122Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,678inferno
1,481nuke
708vertigo
517dust2
96train
70lake
68safehouse
33cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

5Matches
60%Win rate
0.39Avg K/D
ADR
62%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis2100%0.406.5
Mirage10%0.417.0
Ancient10%0.385.0
Nuke1100%0.385.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
597msReaction time
33.5%T opening success
44.0%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
6.26HE damage / grenade
1.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4215 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.5022% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno4–9-0.0816%27 Aug
inferno13–80.025%27 Aug
inferno1–9-0.2025%26 Aug
inferno1–9-0.2131%26 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0417%25 Aug
inferno5–90.0119%25 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0121%22 Aug
inferno8–80.019%22 Aug
cache13–7-0.0211%22 Aug
inferno5–9-0.130%21 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0114%20 Aug
inferno9–40.0816%19 Aug
inferno9–20.1129%19 Aug
ancient5–13-0.038%18 Aug
inferno2–9-0.0525%14 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0925%6 Aug
cache9–13-0.0034%8 Jul
cache4–00.105%8 Jul
vertigo13–100.0313%8 Jul
inferno6–130.0219%8 Jul
inferno9–40.0932%7 Jul
nuke13–70.0814%5 Jul
ancient13–30.1110%5 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0122%5 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0522%30 Jun
nuke13–110.0228%30 Jun
inferno3–9-0.0928%30 Jun
inferno4–9-0.226%30 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0015%10 Jun
mirage10–130.0114%10 Jun
ancient13–110.0215%3 Jun
inferno9–7-0.0224%1 Jun
inferno9–30.1311%24 May
inferno7–9-0.1024%19 May
inferno8–80.0824%18 May
inferno3–9-0.0915%18 May
inferno9–50.0221%17 May
inferno9–70.0111%15 May
anubis13–70.045%6 May
inferno2–13-0.1114%5 May
cache10–13-0.0328%3 May
cache6–13-0.0613%3 May
anubis13–3-0.0214%18 Apr
ancient13–4-0.0113%18 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0815%17 Apr
ancient0–9-0.0513%17 Apr
dust26–13-0.0614%17 Apr
inferno7–9-0.0913%17 Apr
inferno8–80.018%17 Apr
ancient13–10-0.059%17 Apr
nuke13–60.0116%16 Apr
anubis13–70.0616%16 Apr
anubis13–40.0333%16 Apr
inferno9–30.1322%16 Apr
inferno9–7-0.0129%13 Apr
inferno9–60.0118%13 Apr
inferno9–40.0522%13 Apr
inferno0–9-0.2525%4 Apr
inferno5–130.0515%2 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0111%2 Apr
inferno9–70.1318%2 Apr
ancient12–160.0214%30 Mar
overpass6–13-0.0912%30 Mar
inferno9–5-0.0738%30 Mar
inferno9–30.0610%20 Mar
inferno9–7-0.057%19 Mar
inferno1–9-0.220%19 Mar
inferno9–20.0817%18 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0220%17 Mar
inferno9–50.1010%17 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0718%16 Mar
inferno9–6-0.0412%16 Mar
nuke16–12-0.039%11 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0520%11 Mar
inferno9–10.1524%11 Mar
anubis13–110.0119%11 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0222%11 Mar
inferno8–8-0.0215%11 Mar
mirage14–16-0.0420%10 Mar
inferno1–9-0.2721%10 Mar
inferno4–9-0.1221%9 Mar
nuke13–40.0713%9 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0816%9 Mar
inferno7–90.0119%9 Mar
ancient13–3-0.0015%8 Mar
anubis6–130.0527%5 Mar
inferno11–13-0.075%5 Mar
ancient5–130.0122%5 Mar
nuke10–130.0413%4 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0412%4 Mar
inferno4–9-0.2324%4 Mar
inferno3–9-0.118%4 Mar
inferno9–40.0120%4 Mar
inferno9–7-0.0018%3 Mar
inferno2–9-0.120%3 Mar
inferno7–9-0.096%27 Feb
inferno8–80.0821%26 Feb
dust213–6-0.0123%23 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0214%20 Feb
nuke10–13-0.0113%20 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →