Can of milk

Can of milk — CS2 Stats

US76561198088361712[U:1:128095984]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

338Tracked matches48%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,188Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating10,000Blue band · top ~54.9% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Oct 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,000 -2,738 12 Aug – 22 Oct · 4 days played
9,62212,738peak 12,73812 Aug22 Oct
13,738Peak Premier in tracked matches
36Days played since 2026-08-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,738 below peak (12,738)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate31.1%42.0%44.4%13.3% short
Shot accuracy12.4%9.6%11.9%above
Kill/death ratio0.960.981.030.07 short
Match win rate34.6%43.8%45.2%10.6% short

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCan of milkPREMIER10,000 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning73
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–43–7Last 10050%Win rateLLLWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility3.2
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels7.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 86% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 86% on T to 60% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning7.3
Utility3.2
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels8.8
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time587ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 11 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 28 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · dust2, 12 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 26 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
5–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C3917–2244%0.01
mirageA169–756%0.02
infernoA117–464%0.01
anubisD72–529%0.05
cacheB63–350%-0.00
trainS65–183%0.05
ancientC52–340%0.02
nuke—41–325%0.00
vertigo—33–0100%0.06
office—31–233%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

54,832Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
2,163Matches
34.6%Match win rate
31.1%Headshot %
12.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Blue band
4,266MVPs
733Hours (in match)
716Bombs planted
340Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4711,483
SSG 089,058
AWP7,395
Tec-92,826
P901,040
P250749

Lifetime map wins

7,156dust2
1,300inferno
720nuke
288office
256vertigo
242train
134cbble
44lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2Matches
50%Win rate
0.74Avg K/D
84.4ADR
28%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke10%0.5910.0
Inferno1100%0.8814.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
70.5%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
582msReaction time
85.7%T opening success
60.3%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
1.77HE damage / grenade
7.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0118%6 Nov →
cache5–130.0124%6 Nov →
nuke6–10.0617%6 Nov →
dust213–110.0512%6 Nov →
mirage13–100.1413%6 Nov →
inferno13–10-0.0410%3 Nov →
dust213–30.1112%3 Nov →
ancient9–13-0.0118%3 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0726%1 Nov →
anubis13–80.0515%30 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0117%28 Oct →
train8–130.0811%28 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.0850%28 Oct →
dust28–130.0029%28 Oct →
vertigo13–30.061%28 Oct →
office4–130.0214%28 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0510%28 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0215%28 Oct →
dust25–130.0110%27 Oct →
mirage12–30.0717%27 Oct →
anubis13–80.0811%27 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0515%26 Oct →
nuke13–00.0510%26 Oct →
inferno13–110.0211%26 Oct →
dust212–120.0512%26 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0412%26 Oct →
inferno10–20.0113%26 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0236%26 Oct →
mirage13–80.0316%26 Oct →
dust210–130.0110%24 Oct →
inferno13–20.0711%24 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0613%24 Oct →
cache10–130.038%22 Oct →
dust25–8-0.096%22 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0516%22 Oct →
ancient13–70.1312%21 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0022%21 Oct →
mirage13–80.0618%20 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0019%20 Oct →
dust213–20.0016%20 Oct →
dust28–13-0.038%14 Oct →
dust213–90.0114%14 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0411%14 Oct →
mirage13–90.0321%13 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0616%8 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0211%8 Oct →
dust213–110.0613%8 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0020%8 Oct →
train13–90.1020%8 Oct →
train13–40.0421%7 Oct →
dust29–13-0.062%6 Oct →
dust213–40.0816%6 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.074%6 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0618%6 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0218%6 Oct →
cache2–13-0.138%4 Oct →
anubis13–160.0413%30 Sept →
vertigo13–7-0.019%23 Sept →
vertigo13–90.1416%23 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0224%19 Sept →
anubis10–130.0721%18 Sept →
mirage8–130.0110%18 Sept →
anubis11–130.0413%16 Sept →
anubis1–130.0116%16 Sept →
anubis10–130.0929%16 Sept →
inferno13–50.0413%10 Sept →
mirage7–50.1420%6 Sept →
mirage12–120.0212%6 Sept →
mirage13–20.038%4 Sept →
dust213–80.0816%4 Sept →
inferno13–40.065%4 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0321%3 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0314%3 Sept →
dust213–70.0418%2 Sept →
office13–20.0516%2 Sept →
office8–13-0.0215%2 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.130%31 Aug →
dust213–60.085%29 Aug →
inferno8–30.0810%29 Aug →
dust213–50.1124%29 Aug →
cache13–70.1523%29 Aug →
inferno2–130.0423%29 Aug →
dust213–80.0524%28 Aug →
cache13–11-0.063%26 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0113%26 Aug →
dust212–120.1313%16 Aug →
dust25–13-0.034%14 Aug →
mirage0–4-0.130%12 Aug →
dust20–13-0.0910%12 Aug →
train13–100.0418%12 Aug →
train4–1-0.087%12 Aug →
train13–60.0821%12 Aug →
dust28–130.0612%12 Aug →
inferno2–7-0.0719%12 Aug →
mirage13–50.1214%12 Aug →
dust213–100.0132%11 Aug →
dust213–80.0818%11 Aug →
mirage13–20.1519%11 Aug →
ancient12–120.0214%11 Aug →
dust210–130.008%5 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.