cry for your elo

cry for your elo — CS2 Stats

BR76561198083288109[U:1:123022381]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,269Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating11,096Blue band · top ~49.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Apr 2026 (144 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 7 Sep 2023. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,096 -1,438 11 Apr26 Apr · 4 days played
11,09612,534peak 12,53411 Apr26 Apr
12,534Peak Premier in tracked matches
43Days played since 2023-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,438 below peak (12,534)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3,904 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcry for your eloFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER11,096 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning52
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47494Last 10047%Win rateWWLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 20

  • 1361 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility5.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.2
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time576ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy25.7%−5.1%
first ⅓ avg 30.9% → last ⅓ avg 25.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 25 Apr
54%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · ancient, 13 Apr
406msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · nuke, 19 May
16–4Biggest win · mirage, 27 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
81In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
34Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 6nukeWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB34181653%0.00
infernoC1881044%-0.01
nukeD1431121%-0.01
ancientB147750%-0.01
anubisA74357%0.00
dust2S64267%-0.00
cache32167%0.04
vertigo31233%0.04
overpass1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,017Matches
51%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
73.6ADR
61%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8450%1.1014.8
Dust26151%1.0915.1
Ancient4156%1.0715.2
Inferno3656%1.1716.0
Anubis2744%1.1416.3
Nuke2326%0.8113.8
Cache1155%1.1117.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.0%Headshot accuracy
29.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
582msReaction time
27.1%T opening success
47.8%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
6.27HE damage / grenade
13.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.0558% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–8-0.0230%11 Sept
dust213–110.0531%5 Sept
dust27–13-0.0120%30 Aug
dust213–80.0132%30 Aug
anubis13–50.0328%19 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0424%18 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0824%16 Aug
dust213–70.0730%16 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0030%15 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0213%11 Aug
inferno13–110.0025%11 Aug
ancient13–70.0526%28 Jul
anubis9–130.0130%23 Jul
inferno13–90.0726%23 Jul
cache13–110.0741%19 Jul
ancient13–60.0334%1 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0940%19 May
mirage13–60.0215%18 May
mirage8–130.0323%12 May
cache12–12-0.0121%28 Apr
cache13–40.0613%28 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0328%26 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0221%26 Apr
mirage4–130.0334%26 Apr
ancient10–130.0225%26 Apr
nuke5–9-0.0836%26 Apr
inferno1–90.000%26 Apr
nuke8–80.0616%25 Apr
nuke9–10.2719%25 Apr
nuke0–9-0.2214%18 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0354%13 Apr
mirage12–16-0.0338%12 Apr
anubis13–7-0.038%11 Apr
anubis13–100.0318%11 Apr
inferno13–40.1428%11 Apr
mirage11–130.0224%10 Apr
nuke15–150.0428%10 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0626%10 Apr
nuke13–30.0534%10 Apr
mirage13–40.0037%9 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0526%3 Apr
mirage8–130.0131%3 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0817%3 Apr
mirage16–14-0.0626%3 Apr
inferno5–130.0233%3 Apr
inferno4–20.0231%3 Apr
mirage7–130.0239%2 Apr
ancient8–130.0031%2 Apr
ancient13–100.0634%2 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0648%1 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0229%1 Apr
vertigo4–130.1143%1 Apr
ancient5–130.0139%1 Apr
mirage13–20.0030%1 Apr
inferno9–6-0.0835%1 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0641%30 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0324%20 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0714%19 Feb
ancient2–13-0.0726%2 Oct
mirage16–6-0.0426%29 Sept
ancient16–9-0.0332%29 Sept
mirage16–9-0.0319%29 Sept
inferno16–70.0732%29 Sept
ancient16–80.0428%28 Sept
vertigo16–12-0.0423%28 Sept
inferno16–90.0218%28 Sept
overpass9–16-0.0233%28 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0118%28 Sept
mirage6–130.0539%28 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0250%28 Sept
nuke10–16-0.0129%27 Sept
mirage10–16-0.0738%27 Sept
mirage16–90.0731%27 Sept
mirage16–40.0633%27 Sept
mirage16–110.0119%27 Sept
mirage16–100.0825%27 Sept
anubis16–110.0533%27 Sept
mirage16–110.0128%26 Sept
inferno12–16-0.0227%26 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0232%21 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0633%21 Sept
dust24–13-0.1240%21 Sept
mirage3–130.0248%21 Sept
inferno13–16-0.0417%18 Sept
mirage16–140.0122%18 Sept
mirage12–16-0.0441%18 Sept
inferno19–15-0.0427%18 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0928%17 Sept
mirage5–130.0950%17 Sept
mirage11–16-0.0341%15 Sept
mirage16–13-0.0230%15 Sept
mirage16–100.0025%15 Sept
nuke8–130.0133%13 Sept
inferno12–16-0.0232%12 Sept
vertigo6–160.0619%9 Sept
anubis10–16-0.0234%9 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0619%7 Sept
mirage16–80.0025%7 Sept
inferno12–16-0.0319%7 Sept
mirage16–50.1133%7 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →