Mattsson

Mattsson — CS2 Stats

SE76561198082745441[U:1:122479713]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

468Tracked matches63%Win rate2021Tracked since
4,618Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,757 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (32 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,757 → 1,757
+35Tracked matches · now 468
+6.7ppWin rate · 56.7% → 63.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,394 +6,448 3 May – 17 Nov · 16 days played
15,94622,394peak 22,3943 May17 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,757 +0 2 Sept – 23 Sept · 2 observations
1,7571,757peak 1,7572 Sept23 Sept
22,394Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,757Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
61Days played since 2025-05-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,757
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 244 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches4016+24
Win rate50%38%+13pp
K/D5.070.82+4.25
Headshot %74%50%+24pp

Measured 23 Sep 2026 → 25 Oct 2026; previous 28 Aug 2026 → 23 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,119), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate50.7%48.2%50.9%meets
Shot accuracy15.9%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.411.071.09above
Match win rate44.7%46.9%48.4%3.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMattssonFACEITLevel 9 · 1,757 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,757csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning53
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–43–5Last 10052%Win rateWLLLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −3.8pp headshot accuracy · −116ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility6.5
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.3
Utility6.5
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact9.4

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time596ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 9–5 · inferno, 17 Nov →
62%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · inferno, 24 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 1 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 30 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2717–1063%0.01
infernoC187–1139%-0.02
nukeB137–654%-0.00
anubisS118–373%0.01
dust2D93–633%0.01
ancientA53–260%-0.04
trainC52–340%-0.01
cache—42–250%-0.03
overpass—42–250%0.04
golden—10–10%0.09
rooftop—11–0100%0.06
grail—10–10%-0.05
agency—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

144,424Lifetime kills
1.41K/D · Top 10% of Level 9 players
4,930Matches
44.7%Match win rate
50.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
15.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
11,384MVPs
2,436Hours (in match)
4,564Bombs planted
1,411Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4756,954
AWP16,535
P2503,995
FAMAS2,176
Knife1,533
Tec-91,262

Lifetime map wins

8,970dust2
8,399inferno
4,326nuke
2,760vertigo
1,810train
1,414cbble
199dust
192aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

596Matches
53%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
71.9ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9546%0.9614.8
Nuke5547%0.9814.8
Inferno4556%0.9113.3
Dust22854%1.0015.8
Anubis2361%1.0514.6
Overpass2143%1.0913.6
Ancient1759%0.9214.7
Train1060%1.1017.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
69.4%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
580msReaction time
39.4%T opening success
44.9%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
12.26HE damage / grenade
12.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.4297% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–13-0.0619%21 Oct →
mirage1–130.0212%18 Oct →
nuke8–130.0325%3 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0911%2 Oct →
anubis13–100.0715%2 Oct →
anubis19–160.0213%2 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0616%1 Oct →
inferno13–90.0114%30 Sept →
mirage13–20.0519%30 Sept →
dust213–80.0323%30 Sept →
ancient19–16-0.0216%29 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0310%29 Sept →
cache9–13-0.1117%19 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0342%12 Sept →
mirage13–70.0817%5 Sept →
dust210–130.0316%22 Aug →
mirage13–90.0421%2 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0017%27 Jul →
mirage13–80.0329%25 Jul →
mirage13–160.0322%24 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0225%19 Jul →
nuke13–50.0415%19 Jul →
mirage13–50.0121%19 Jul →
mirage19–170.0216%18 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0417%17 Jul →
mirage13–60.0221%14 Jul →
mirage13–110.0419%12 Jul →
dust213–50.0728%9 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.0224%8 Jul →
cache13–100.0323%26 Jun →
dust21–5-0.110%26 Jun →
cache13–80.0213%12 Jun →
cache8–13-0.0612%3 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0516%3 Jun →
nuke4–00.0520%3 Jun →
anubis3–13-0.066%3 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0624%31 May →
mirage13–11-0.0221%29 May →
dust23–13-0.0416%29 May →
inferno13–80.0010%22 May →
overpass7–13-0.0616%28 Mar →
inferno7–9-0.0616%27 Mar →
nuke16–130.0019%7 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0124%31 Jan →
inferno10–13-0.0212%26 Dec →
golden12–120.0931%20 Dec →
nuke13–4-0.0420%20 Dec →
ancient4–13-0.0631%20 Dec →
anubis13–110.0425%26 Nov →
inferno9–50.1037%17 Nov →
dust213–20.0822%17 Nov →
rooftop9–70.0619%17 Nov →
nuke15–150.0116%17 Nov →
train8–13-0.023%14 Nov →
dust25–130.0527%14 Nov →
mirage13–100.0320%9 Nov →
train4–13-0.0320%8 Nov →
ancient13–5-0.0510%8 Nov →
mirage7–13-0.0711%8 Nov →
ancient13–10-0.0618%8 Nov →
inferno13–90.0112%20 Oct →
mirage13–40.0418%20 Oct →
nuke13–100.0328%18 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0734%15 Oct →
inferno13–100.0216%12 Oct →
mirage13–70.019%12 Oct →
overpass13–70.0813%12 Oct →
overpass8–130.0515%9 Oct →
overpass16–130.0920%4 Oct →
mirage16–140.0820%4 Oct →
inferno13–20.0462%24 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0022%11 Sept →
train1–13-0.0920%9 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0019%6 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0222%6 Aug →
mirage10–130.0113%16 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0020%16 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0520%13 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0317%13 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0323%11 Jul →
train13–110.0223%11 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0838%11 Jul →
nuke16–140.0021%28 Jun →
mirage13–80.0613%28 Jun →
anubis13–8-0.0128%28 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0913%27 Jun →
inferno10–130.0320%13 Jun →
anubis13–50.0924%10 May →
mirage12–160.0011%10 May →
nuke5–13-0.0425%10 May →
grail10–13-0.0519%9 May →
anubis16–130.0619%9 May →
train13–100.0618%9 May →
agency12–12-0.0420%9 May →
dust29–13-0.0424%8 May →
anubis13–7-0.0127%8 May →
dust26–13-0.0120%3 May →
inferno3–13-0.069%2 May →
nuke5–13-0.0827%2 May →
anubis15–150.0328%2 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.