Pandafresh

Pandafresh — CS2 Stats

76561198305396408[U:1:345130680]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,687Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,550 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Aug 2026 (26 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,550 → 2,550
+33Tracked matches · now 2,687
−16.7ppWin rate · 56.7% → 40.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 56 days played since 20 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,909 -711 20 Mar3 Jul · 11 days played
25,48426,768peak 26,76820 Mar3 Jul
Faceit ELO: 2,550 +0 28 Aug23 Sept · 2 observations
2,5502,550peak 2,55028 Aug23 Sept
26,892Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,550Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
56Days played since 2026-03-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,550
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 450 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPandafreshFACEITLevel 10 · 2,550 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,550csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning45
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45541Last 10045%Win rateLLLWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility5.9
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.5
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time536ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 524ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy25.1%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 27.5% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 9–2 · nuke, 30 Jul
52%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · dust2, 22 Mar
328msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · nuke, 9 Jul
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 9 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
1010In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 60% over 5infernoWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27151256%0.01
ancientC1761135%0.01
nukeB179853%0.05
dust2D93633%-0.00
infernoD92722%0.01
anubisC73443%0.02
cacheC52340%0.04
overpassA53260%0.01
vertigo42250%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,282Matches
51%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
87.3ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage42151%1.1718.5
Nuke23151%1.2317.5
Inferno22948%1.1317.9
Ancient17349%1.1116.8
Anubis13854%1.2618.6
Dust27938%1.0817.2
Overpass6356%1.2718.5
Vertigo5362%1.3220.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.2%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
72.9%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
524msReaction time
32.1%T opening success
36.2%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
9.59HE damage / grenade
13.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.1036% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient4–13-0.0325%16 Sept
nuke7–130.0525%12 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0815%12 Sept
ancient13–60.018%4 Sept
mirage11–130.0122%4 Sept
cache7–130.0143%4 Sept
dust26–130.0127%4 Sept
mirage17–190.0328%31 Aug
nuke13–40.1535%31 Aug
cache13–7-0.0131%26 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.0825%20 Aug
vertigo13–9-0.0432%20 Aug
nuke13–160.0528%20 Aug
mirage13–110.0737%20 Aug
ancient13–90.0217%20 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0627%9 Aug
mirage13–60.0129%9 Aug
anubis17–190.0122%7 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0115%6 Aug
anubis13–110.0030%5 Aug
mirage13–9-0.056%2 Aug
nuke9–20.2128%30 Jul
dust215–190.0230%24 Jul
nuke13–110.0427%24 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0321%24 Jul
vertigo6–13-0.0513%23 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0818%23 Jul
ancient10–130.0238%23 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0330%23 Jul
anubis13–110.0523%23 Jul
inferno17–19-0.0620%23 Jul
mirage13–100.0325%20 Jul
mirage19–170.0129%18 Jul
mirage16–120.0128%15 Jul
inferno13–100.0226%12 Jul
ancient7–130.0130%9 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0421%9 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0421%9 Jul
nuke13–10.1137%9 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0828%8 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0328%3 Jul
anubis13–30.1231%3 Jul
mirage16–130.0120%2 Jul
inferno11–130.0120%2 Jul
dust216–120.0419%30 Jun
overpass13–30.1224%28 Jun
cache2–13-0.0024%28 Jun
nuke17–190.0120%28 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0218%27 Jun
dust213–10-0.0124%20 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0124%19 Jun
ancient7–130.0229%18 Jun
nuke13–40.0535%17 Jun
nuke9–130.0518%16 Jun
mirage9–130.0334%11 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0132%11 Jun
dust211–13-0.0328%7 Jun
cache8–130.0133%3 Jun
mirage6–130.0336%3 Jun
nuke4–00.0921%3 Jun
anubis3–130.0423%3 Jun
overpass13–50.0119%1 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0515%1 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0124%31 May
mirage16–19-0.0427%31 May
mirage13–110.0125%29 May
dust23–13-0.0132%29 May
ancient5–130.0820%23 May
mirage16–140.0327%21 May
mirage13–90.0325%21 May
ancient8–130.0428%18 May
ancient9–13-0.0218%18 May
inferno6–130.0122%17 May
nuke13–70.0730%17 May
mirage10–13-0.0121%17 May
overpass13–6-0.0118%10 May
mirage8–130.0428%7 May
ancient16–130.0923%4 May
ancient13–90.1018%3 May
cache13–60.1734%29 Apr
nuke13–70.0531%24 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0329%24 Apr
anubis5–13-0.1025%24 Apr
inferno13–90.1931%16 Apr
nuke13–70.0228%12 Apr
inferno11–130.0129%7 Apr
mirage15–150.0634%30 Mar
overpass7–13-0.0123%28 Mar
nuke7–130.0337%26 Mar
vertigo13–100.0533%24 Mar
dust28–13-0.0052%22 Mar
ancient13–70.0218%22 Mar
mirage13–80.0326%22 Mar
mirage11–130.0430%22 Mar
dust28–13-0.0332%22 Mar
inferno4–130.0633%22 Mar
ancient9–130.0228%21 Mar
overpass7–13-0.0722%21 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0416%21 Mar
dust213–7-0.0042%20 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →