SyleX

SyleX — CS2 Stats

DE76561198079877898[U:1:119612170]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

558Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,633Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,461Purple band · top ~26.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 29 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,461 -1,290 30 Jan11 Sept · 32 days played
15,46121,108peak 21,10830 Jan11 Sept
21,800Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-01-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,647 below peak (21,108)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,539 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,483), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate44.2%46.8%48.3%4.1% short
Shot accuracy21.8%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.121.061.07above
Match win rate46.2%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSyleXFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER15,461 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning43
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51463Last 10051%Win rateLLWLLWWTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · +68ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 630ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility4.0
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 635ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.3
Utility4.0
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time634ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 689ms → last ⅓ avg 634ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 4–13 · inferno, 17 Aug
43%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · dust2, 28 Feb
484msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 31 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 18 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 16anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC25101540%-0.02
ancientS1612475%0.01
mirageA1610663%0.01
overpassA116555%-0.02
cacheA95456%-0.00
anubisD92722%-0.01
dust2D82625%-0.04
nukeS64267%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

113,417Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
5,177Matches
46.2%Match win rate
44.2%Headshot %
21.8%Shot accuracy · Top 1% of Level 8 players
11,292MVPs
2,485Hours (in match)
5,476Bombs planted
2,280Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4747,083
AWP6,610
P2503,948
FAMAS3,196
Knife1,993
MP91,312

Lifetime map wins

13,310inferno
7,248dust2
5,082nuke
1,933train
1,050cbble
362vertigo
96safehouse
80lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
84.7%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
635msReaction time
31.8%T opening success
31.9%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
0.9%Flash assists
10.75HE damage / grenade
2.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.4168 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.7879% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache8–13-0.0324%11 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0614%11 Sept
cache13–40.0415%6 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0217%6 Sept
cache9–13-0.0526%6 Sept
cache13–5-0.0214%4 Sept
cache13–80.0528%4 Sept
anubis15–150.0417%4 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0317%1 Sept
mirage10–130.0533%1 Sept
inferno13–60.0613%31 Aug
mirage9–130.0711%31 Aug
inferno13–80.0238%24 Aug
cache13–8-0.0414%24 Aug
mirage13–40.0624%21 Aug
ancient13–50.1024%21 Aug
inferno13–90.0311%18 Aug
cache11–13-0.0426%18 Aug
ancient13–20.0619%17 Aug
inferno4–130.1023%17 Aug
cache13–70.0126%27 Jul
inferno13–70.0523%27 Jul
ancient11–130.0233%22 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0216%22 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0616%16 Jul
cache12–160.0223%16 Jul
mirage13–90.0634%2 Jul
dust210–130.0115%2 Jul
overpass12–16-0.0521%12 Apr
dust213–10-0.0816%12 Apr
inferno5–13-0.1013%12 Apr
ancient16–140.0019%5 Apr
nuke13–70.0613%5 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0524%4 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0123%4 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0311%4 Apr
mirage16–13-0.0219%1 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0220%1 Apr
dust23–13-0.0817%30 Mar
ancient8–130.0117%30 Mar
overpass14–160.0123%29 Mar
mirage3–13-0.098%29 Mar
dust23–13-0.0514%26 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0216%26 Mar
overpass13–5-0.0226%19 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0639%19 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0314%18 Mar
anubis3–13-0.042%18 Mar
mirage13–10.0731%18 Mar
ancient13–70.0419%18 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0317%17 Mar
ancient13–100.0118%17 Mar
overpass13–110.0013%17 Mar
overpass13–9-0.0120%9 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0111%9 Mar
inferno9–130.0129%9 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0022%9 Mar
overpass13–110.0119%1 Mar
inferno13–80.0129%1 Mar
dust27–13-0.0243%28 Feb
ancient13–70.0612%28 Feb
dust28–13-0.0825%23 Feb
mirage14–16-0.0116%23 Feb
overpass13–11-0.0315%19 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0511%19 Feb
anubis13–40.0631%16 Feb
dust213–60.0322%16 Feb
ancient15–150.0221%16 Feb
mirage13–4-0.0031%16 Feb
ancient16–13-0.0221%15 Feb
dust211–13-0.0227%15 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0720%15 Feb
inferno15–150.0318%12 Feb
nuke13–6-0.0129%12 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0527%12 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0118%11 Feb
overpass11–13-0.0310%10 Feb
inferno13–50.0227%10 Feb
mirage13–70.0416%10 Feb
mirage13–30.0019%9 Feb
anubis13–40.038%9 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0312%9 Feb
inferno13–4-0.0422%4 Feb
overpass13–10-0.0223%3 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0413%3 Feb
overpass13–16-0.0222%2 Feb
inferno13–5-0.0417%1 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0210%1 Feb
overpass4–13-0.0617%31 Jan
inferno13–8-0.0216%31 Jan
nuke3–13-0.0618%30 Jan
ancient13–10.0316%30 Jan
mirage10–130.0024%30 Jan
nuke13–110.0112%30 Jan
mirage13–80.009%30 Jan
nuke9–13-0.0613%30 Jan
inferno6–13-0.0716%30 Jan
inferno5–13-0.0714%29 Jan
ancient13–6-0.0311%29 Jan
mirage13–80.0115%29 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →