Mandalori4n

Mandalori4n — CS2 Stats

76561198053589223[U:1:93323495]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,263Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,226Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#60460 of 230861 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 17 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,226 -4,919 17 Mar13 Sept · 32 days played
19,66226,664peak 26,66417 Mar13 Sept
26,664Peak Premier in tracked matches
47Days played since 2026-03-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,438 below peak (26,664)
  • +1,564 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,774 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMandalori4nFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,226 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning52
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47476Last 10047%Win rateLLLLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +4.7pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility6.5
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.2
Utility6.5
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact8.6

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time585ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy22.7%+4.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 23 Aug
43%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · ancient, 6 Sept
172msFastest reaction time · 2–2 · anubis, 2 May
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 18 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 68% over 19anubisWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB22111150%0.02
ancientS1913668%0.03
cacheB179853%0.02
mirageC1661038%0.00
anubisD1431121%-0.02
nuke42250%0.01
dust241325%-0.01
overpass42250%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,345Matches
51%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
79.5ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
48%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient6062%1.0516.9
Anubis4854%1.1117.4
Inferno2045%1.1715.0
Nuke1963%1.1518.0
Mirage1747%1.0616.3
Overpass1631%0.8617.0
Vertigo1070%1.2216.2
Dust240%0.7312.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
79.9%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
578msReaction time
28.4%T opening success
49.1%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
13.1%Flash assists
9.76HE damage / grenade
9.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.3547% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0513%13 Sept
mirage10–130.0139%13 Sept
cache8–13-0.0612%11 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0515%11 Sept
inferno13–100.0619%7 Sept
ancient13–40.0625%7 Sept
ancient5–130.0143%6 Sept
cache9–130.0616%6 Sept
cache13–50.0427%4 Sept
cache13–80.0728%4 Sept
anubis15–150.0321%4 Sept
inferno8–130.0220%1 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0121%1 Sept
inferno13–60.0219%31 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0411%31 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0122%28 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0621%28 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0118%28 Aug
anubis15–15-0.066%25 Aug
ancient13–90.0231%25 Aug
inferno13–80.0313%24 Aug
cache13–80.0226%24 Aug
cache13–50.1137%23 Aug
ancient6–00.0832%23 Aug
mirage11–130.0223%23 Aug
cache4–130.0220%23 Aug
inferno13–110.0128%23 Aug
mirage13–40.0529%21 Aug
ancient13–50.0425%21 Aug
inferno13–110.0515%19 Aug
anubis13–20.0434%19 Aug
inferno13–90.0622%18 Aug
cache11–130.0818%18 Aug
ancient13–20.0621%17 Aug
inferno4–130.0719%17 Aug
inferno13–70.0223%27 Jul
ancient13–30.0615%26 Jul
mirage13–50.0733%26 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0116%26 Jul
ancient11–130.0616%22 Jul
inferno11–130.0727%22 Jul
anubis9–130.0419%16 Jul
cache12–160.0319%16 Jul
nuke10–130.0111%15 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0113%15 Jul
cache13–80.0227%13 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0222%2 Jul
dust210–130.0015%2 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0515%28 May
inferno9–13-0.0317%27 May
ancient9–130.0120%27 May
nuke13–60.0116%27 May
anubis8–13-0.0518%11 May
ancient9–13-0.0115%11 May
cache13–8-0.068%11 May
inferno4–13-0.0218%8 May
cache13–110.0227%7 May
ancient13–110.0117%7 May
mirage7–130.0224%3 May
anubis2–2-0.110%2 May
cache13–100.0230%2 May
cache12–12-0.0220%1 May
cache7–130.0228%1 May
mirage0–5-0.060%30 Apr
cache13–70.0516%30 Apr
cache7–13-0.0631%30 Apr
overpass13–110.009%26 Apr
ancient13–80.0611%26 Apr
ancient0–10-0.036%26 Apr
overpass12–16-0.0516%12 Apr
dust213–100.0621%12 Apr
inferno5–130.0414%12 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0222%9 Apr
inferno13–30.0516%9 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0019%5 Apr
nuke13–70.0511%5 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0525%4 Apr
ancient13–110.1121%4 Apr
anubis16–140.078%2 Apr
mirage16–130.0528%1 Apr
inferno13–90.0718%1 Apr
dust23–13-0.0027%30 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0320%30 Mar
overpass14–160.0119%29 Mar
mirage3–13-0.029%29 Mar
dust23–13-0.085%26 Mar
mirage10–130.0025%26 Mar
nuke3–13-0.047%25 Mar
anubis15–150.0119%25 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0418%24 Mar
inferno13–40.0122%23 Mar
ancient13–3-0.039%23 Mar
overpass13–50.1121%19 Mar
inferno6–130.0114%19 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0514%18 Mar
anubis3–13-0.0239%18 Mar
mirage13–10.0115%18 Mar
ancient13–70.0127%18 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0715%17 Mar
ancient13–100.0628%17 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →