mojoin

mojoin — CS2 Stats

US76561198077783539[U:1:117517811]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

636Tracked matches50%Win rate2024Tracked since
577Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (44 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+23Tracked matches · now 636
−7.1ppWin rate · 57.1% → 50.0%

Rating over time

57Days played since 2026-04-22

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,110), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate46.9%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.4%12.7%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.131.031.05above
Match win rate38.0%45.2%45.7%7.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmojoinFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning77
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–45–5Last 10050%Win rateLLWLWTWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 478ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility3.2
Positioning7.7
Opening Duels6.5
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning7.7
Utility3.2
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels8.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time556ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–7 · office, 29 Apr →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 9–7 · inferno, 19 Jun →
398msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 9 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 21 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
9–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 59% over 29ancientWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA2917–1259%0.03
officeC146–843%0.05
dust2A116–555%0.02
vertigoA95–456%0.06
mirageA95–456%0.04
infernoA74–357%0.06
nukeD72–529%0.03
ancientD51–420%0.02
anubis—43–175%0.07
overpass—20–20%-0.02
train—21–150%0.04
debris—10–10%-0.31

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

23,887Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
1,094Matches
38.0%Match win rate
46.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,464MVPs
555Hours (in match)
671Bombs planted
186Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,573dust2
1,056office
713nuke
671inferno
651vertigo
196train
55italy
7ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

11Matches
73%Win rate
2.13Avg K/D
118.7ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
44%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3100%1.5719.3
Dust2367%1.9520.0
Inferno250%2.0422.5
Vertigo1100%4.5732.0
Nuke10%2.0635.0
Anubis1100%2.1726.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.8%Spray accuracy
66.6%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
548msReaction time
58.9%T opening success
65.8%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
5.79HE damage / grenade
3.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.2855 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno5–130.0419%9 Oct →
vertigo8–130.0724%8 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0510%8 Oct →
office6–130.0422%26 Sept →
cache13–110.078%26 Sept →
ancient12–120.0415%26 Sept →
anubis13–110.0413%22 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.0124%22 Sept →
overpass5–13-0.0517%20 Sept →
cache13–80.0711%15 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0423%14 Sept →
vertigo13–50.1018%14 Sept →
mirage13–100.0420%13 Sept →
dust213–40.1611%13 Sept →
nuke8–130.0111%12 Sept →
cache10–130.0115%12 Sept →
cache13–80.0714%10 Sept →
dust29–130.0217%9 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0218%7 Sept →
inferno9–130.1112%6 Sept →
cache10–130.0016%5 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0218%5 Sept →
office13–8-0.0017%2 Sept →
vertigo13–30.1028%31 Aug →
cache12–120.0014%24 Aug →
vertigo5–13-0.0410%24 Aug →
cache8–130.0212%17 Aug →
anubis13–60.0111%16 Aug →
dust210–130.0816%16 Aug →
office8–130.0420%10 Aug →
cache13–50.1819%4 Aug →
train10–60.0424%3 Aug →
nuke13–80.0814%3 Aug →
inferno8–80.0515%3 Aug →
mirage13–100.0419%3 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0319%1 Aug →
vertigo13–50.1522%31 Jul →
vertigo13–80.0210%30 Jul →
vertigo10–130.0013%30 Jul →
vertigo11–13-0.027%29 Jul →
nuke11–130.0225%29 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.0326%27 Jul →
dust212–120.0013%27 Jul →
anubis4–130.0518%26 Jul →
anubis13–90.1521%26 Jul →
nuke6–130.0515%26 Jul →
office13–70.1232%26 Jul →
dust29–130.0211%24 Jul →
mirage13–00.1710%21 Jul →
cache13–70.1214%21 Jul →
inferno13–50.0616%20 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0125%20 Jul →
cache13–70.057%20 Jul →
office3–13-0.0120%18 Jul →
cache6–130.0530%18 Jul →
train8–130.0420%18 Jul →
debris2–9-0.3110%15 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0235%15 Jul →
cache11–130.0314%14 Jul →
nuke10–130.0528%13 Jul →
office9–13-0.0314%8 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0311%7 Jul →
nuke13–60.0612%7 Jul →
ancient13–70.0513%7 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0220%30 Jun →
vertigo13–20.1710%29 Jun →
cache1–6-0.1513%27 Jun →
dust216–140.0118%24 Jun →
ancient9–130.0011%20 Jun →
mirage13–90.0712%20 Jun →
inferno9–50.066%19 Jun →
inferno9–70.1347%19 Jun →
office13–60.029%13 Jun →
office4–60.1227%9 Jun →
dust213–110.0317%7 Jun →
office9–130.0322%6 Jun →
cache9–130.0619%6 Jun →
mirage2–130.1226%29 May →
cache13–70.0415%29 May →
cache13–11-0.0417%29 May →
cache13–60.0015%28 May →
mirage7–130.0323%28 May →
office13–50.1019%25 May →
ancient7–130.0715%2 May →
cache2–1-0.010%1 May →
cache13–100.0818%1 May →
cache3–130.0411%30 Apr →
office7–20.1032%30 Apr →
cache13–110.0310%29 Apr →
cache13–90.0518%29 Apr →
cache9–130.1013%29 Apr →
office13–70.1819%29 Apr →
cache13–80.1114%29 Apr →
cache7–13-0.0021%29 Apr →
ancient12–12-0.0516%25 Apr →
dust27–13-0.028%25 Apr →
office10–130.0815%25 Apr →
overpass5–130.0111%23 Apr →
office7–13-0.0313%22 Apr →
nuke4–13-0.0714%22 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.