M1LO

M1LO — CS2 Stats

76561198076822985[U:1:116557257]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,196Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,494Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,836Blue band · top ~29.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+483Premier CS Rating · 14,353 → 14,836

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,836 +2,128 30 Aug – 28 Oct · 29 days played
11,95715,116peak 15,11630 Aug28 Oct
15,631Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 280 below peak (15,116)
  • +1,929 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 164 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate52.5%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy13.2%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.950.991.020.06 short
Match win rate49.8%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGM1LOFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,836 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning69
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–54Last 10046%Win rateLLLLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +6.9pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility5.4
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning6.9
Utility5.4
Mechanics3.8
Opening Duels5.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time537ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 1 Oct →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · mirage, 15 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 16 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 17 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L4Current streak
6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 11anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2211–1150%0.01
dust2B179–853%-0.02
cacheD155–1033%-0.01
mirageC145–936%-0.01
infernoC135–838%-0.00
ancientS118–373%0.02
anubisD51–420%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%-0.01
office—10–10%-0.07
poseidon—11–0100%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

313,340Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
14,341Matches
49.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
52.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
13.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
35,732MVPs
7,494Hours (in match)
3,722Bombs planted
907Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4777,026
AWP54,324
Glock-1812,777
SSG 088,313
SG 5535,087
MAG-74,574
P2504,116

Lifetime map wins

108,870office
9,183nuke
8,749inferno
5,549dust2
3,653vertigo
1,324train
906cbble
140lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,135Matches
50%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
77.3ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno16352%0.9714.6
Anubis15854%0.9314.5
Mirage13048%0.8913.2
Ancient12852%0.9314.1
Nuke10845%0.8413.7
Vertigo8352%0.9214.6
Dust28048%0.8112.1
Overpass1839%0.8412.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
28.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.6%Spray accuracy
67.0%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
544msReaction time
54.9%T opening success
50.3%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
7.35HE damage / grenade
6.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.0318%28 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0517%27 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0618%27 Oct →
dust211–130.0113%26 Oct →
nuke13–110.0133%26 Oct →
cache13–80.0421%26 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0318%26 Oct →
dust213–60.0419%25 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0335%25 Oct →
ancient13–90.0526%18 Oct →
dust213–8-0.074%18 Oct →
mirage16–130.0216%18 Oct →
nuke13–30.019%18 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0830%18 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.028%18 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0314%18 Oct →
cache3–13-0.048%17 Oct →
ancient7–130.0129%16 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.1011%16 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0022%15 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0128%15 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0917%15 Oct →
cache7–130.0030%15 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0132%15 Oct →
inferno13–90.1127%15 Oct →
mirage6–130.0343%15 Oct →
mirage13–30.0823%15 Oct →
inferno13–60.0526%15 Oct →
cache13–160.0421%15 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0329%14 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0613%14 Oct →
inferno8–130.0214%14 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0527%6 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0415%5 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0721%5 Oct →
nuke9–130.0429%5 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.003%5 Oct →
nuke13–60.0215%5 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0616%5 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0316%5 Oct →
mirage10–130.0625%5 Oct →
cache13–100.0521%4 Oct →
inferno16–120.0626%4 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0133%4 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0328%4 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0217%4 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0223%4 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0728%3 Oct →
dust26–130.0516%3 Oct →
mirage16–140.0119%3 Oct →
cache16–12-0.0129%3 Oct →
nuke13–70.0332%2 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0216%2 Oct →
dust213–60.0216%1 Oct →
nuke13–50.1318%1 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0415%1 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0027%30 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0719%28 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0822%28 Sept →
nuke13–70.0323%26 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0329%26 Sept →
inferno13–110.0329%26 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0116%25 Sept →
ancient13–50.0229%25 Sept →
nuke10–130.0024%25 Sept →
inferno13–90.0222%25 Sept →
dust214–160.0331%23 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0212%22 Sept →
ancient9–130.0413%22 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0421%22 Sept →
vertigo9–3-0.014%21 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.056%17 Sept →
cache12–16-0.079%17 Sept →
office6–13-0.0722%17 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0218%17 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0915%17 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0621%17 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0125%17 Sept →
anubis11–130.0525%17 Sept →
ancient13–20.0726%17 Sept →
nuke8–130.0615%16 Sept →
ancient13–80.0017%16 Sept →
cache16–140.0213%16 Sept →
cache10–130.0019%16 Sept →
ancient13–60.0815%16 Sept →
poseidon9–3-0.0722%16 Sept →
nuke13–80.0221%10 Sept →
nuke13–110.0222%10 Sept →
nuke7–130.0225%10 Sept →
ancient13–60.0130%10 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0321%10 Sept →
nuke13–100.0223%7 Sept →
ancient10–130.0210%6 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0224%6 Sept →
nuke13–50.0324%5 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0134%5 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0511%3 Sept →
nuke10–10.0433%3 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0730%30 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0329%30 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.