Tesafilm klebt

Tesafilm klebt — CS2 Stats

DE76561198073255379[U:1:112989651]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,538Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,739Hours in CS26Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,768Top 5% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6828 of 231773 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 9 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,768 -57 9 Jun18 Sept · 12 days played
25,00027,047peak 27,0479 Jun18 Sept
27,509Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-06-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 279 below peak (27,047)
  • -216 over 30 days · steady
  • +867 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 3,232 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,320), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate37.5%48.3%51.0%13.5% short
Shot accuracy16.5%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.361.071.09above
Match win rate51.6%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTesafilm klebtFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER26,768 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning53
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54442Last 10054%Win rateWLWLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +5.7pp headshot accuracy · −65ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 452ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 478ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility6.1
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.3
Utility6.1
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time521ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 521ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 12–12 · dust2, 16 Aug
32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · mirage, 27 Aug
383msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 18 Sept
13–0Biggest win · cache, 14 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
1110In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB21101148%0.02
cacheA1912763%0.01
ancientS1813572%0.02
dust2C1771041%0.01
anubisD93633%0.02
nukeS65183%0.02
mirageS64267%0.03
overpass3030%-0.01
vertigo1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

90,104Lifetime kills
1.36K/D · Top 10% of Level 9 players
4,308Matches
51.6%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players
37.5%Headshot %
16.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
10,734MVPs
1,693Hours (in match)
5,753Bombs planted
1,356Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

9,100inferno
4,960dust2
2,204nuke
1,203cbble
1,056vertigo
993train
224office
140italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

376Matches
56%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
82.3ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3459%1.2017.2
Dust23259%1.3217.0
Inferno2245%1.2516.3
Anubis2167%1.2115.9
Cache1250%1.3716.6
Overpass1164%1.0213.7
Mirage633%0.9912.8
Nuke560%1.1515.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
70.9%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
524msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
37.8%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
7.49HE damage / grenade
8.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.1966% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–90.0910%18 Sept
anubis3–130.0618%18 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0123%18 Sept
ancient1–13-0.0629%15 Sept
dust213–100.0415%15 Sept
nuke8–13-0.0221%15 Sept
inferno13–100.0415%14 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0111%9 Sept
anubis13–40.0425%9 Sept
cache13–40.0715%9 Sept
dust211–13-0.067%9 Sept
dust29–13-0.0516%9 Sept
ancient13–70.028%9 Sept
dust213–110.0315%7 Sept
dust212–160.026%7 Sept
cache11–130.0210%7 Sept
inferno13–50.039%7 Sept
inferno8–130.0317%30 Aug
dust210–130.0525%30 Aug
dust213–11-0.0713%30 Aug
ancient4–00.0614%30 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0321%27 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0516%27 Aug
ancient13–80.0117%27 Aug
mirage13–60.0632%27 Aug
dust211–13-0.0113%27 Aug
cache13–50.0515%27 Aug
nuke13–80.0117%24 Aug
dust213–11-0.0123%24 Aug
mirage9–130.0121%24 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0517%24 Aug
cache7–130.0711%24 Aug
anubis13–70.0712%24 Aug
ancient13–60.0418%24 Aug
inferno7–130.0213%20 Aug
dust210–130.0429%20 Aug
nuke13–60.028%20 Aug
nuke13–110.0019%20 Aug
dust213–160.0425%20 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0318%20 Aug
ancient5–13-0.063%19 Aug
cache16–140.0412%19 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0123%19 Aug
inferno17–19-0.0221%18 Aug
inferno13–50.0317%18 Aug
cache13–80.0215%18 Aug
ancient13–80.0218%18 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0323%18 Aug
ancient13–40.0711%17 Aug
cache8–13-0.0212%17 Aug
cache7–13-0.0324%17 Aug
inferno13–70.0416%17 Aug
cache13–70.0117%17 Aug
dust212–120.1114%16 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0511%15 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0219%15 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0117%15 Aug
inferno14–160.0223%15 Aug
dust213–110.0016%15 Aug
cache13–5-0.076%7 Aug
inferno13–110.0228%7 Aug
vertigo8–13-0.0110%3 Aug
cache11–13-0.017%31 Jul
ancient13–110.0315%31 Jul
cache13–6-0.037%31 Jul
ancient13–50.1027%31 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0326%31 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0612%31 Jul
cache13–7-0.0013%31 Jul
anubis5–130.0115%17 Jul
ancient10–2-0.0625%17 Jul
cache5–13-0.0214%15 Jul
inferno13–70.0514%15 Jul
cache13–6-0.0114%14 Jul
cache13–00.025%14 Jul
mirage13–80.0524%14 Jul
ancient13–70.036%11 Jul
anubis10–130.0316%11 Jul
inferno10–130.0617%11 Jul
dust213–90.0218%11 Jul
cache13–80.0018%11 Jul
overpass9–130.0023%1 Jul
nuke13–100.1015%28 Jun
inferno13–90.0617%28 Jun
dust26–130.0613%28 Jun
inferno16–140.0824%28 Jun
overpass10–130.0216%23 Jun
mirage13–80.0410%23 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0321%23 Jun
nuke13–110.0011%23 Jun
anubis11–130.0921%23 Jun
ancient11–130.0418%22 Jun
inferno13–80.0715%22 Jun
dust28–130.0224%22 Jun
mirage13–110.0623%22 Jun
dust213–9-0.0214%12 Jun
inferno6–130.0418%12 Jun
cache12–12-0.0111%12 Jun
cache13–40.0518%11 Jun
ancient10–130.0615%9 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →