Rapi ♫

Rapi ♫ — CS2 Stats

76561198133330768[U:1:173065040]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,208Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,024Top 25% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#30863 of 251258 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,024 +3,429 30 Aug – 6 Oct · 24 days played
20,59524,254peak 24,25430 Aug6 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,983 +0 3 Sept – 18 Sept · 2 observations
1,9831,983peak 1,9833 Sept18 Sept
24,427Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,983Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 230 below peak (24,254)
  • +2,115 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 976 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRapi ♫FACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER24,024 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,983csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning50
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateWWLLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +2.4pp headshot accuracy · +43ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 20

  • 13–6–1 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility6.7
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch6.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.0
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time608ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms
Headshot accuracy13.2%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 13.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–8 · ancient, 7 Sept →
30%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · dust2, 14 Sept →
453msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · cache, 27 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 16 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 22infernoWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA2716–1159%0.00
dust2A2715–1256%-0.00
ancientA2214–864%0.01
infernoD123–925%0.00
mirageC52–340%-0.00
nuke—42–250%0.01
anubis—32–167%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

488Matches
54%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
80.4ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

51%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22861%1.1916.2
Ancient1861%1.0314.7
Mirage1450%1.1416.2
Anubis1354%1.0717.1
Overpass667%1.1817.2
Inferno667%1.2215.8
Train650%1.0114.2
Cache40%0.7014.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.2%Headshot accuracy
40.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.0%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
601msReaction time
34.0%T opening success
50.5%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
9.76HE damage / grenade
17.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.2467% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–90.0111%10 Oct →
ancient13–100.0413%10 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0412%10 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0313%6 Oct →
cache13–60.0712%6 Oct →
ancient13–2-0.0110%6 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0116%6 Oct →
ancient13–110.0510%6 Oct →
ancient13–100.0515%5 Oct →
cache11–130.0116%5 Oct →
dust213–4-0.016%5 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.058%5 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0412%5 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0413%5 Oct →
ancient15–150.026%4 Oct →
dust216–130.0812%4 Oct →
cache13–3-0.0210%4 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0810%4 Oct →
cache13–60.0212%4 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0115%4 Oct →
ancient8–130.023%4 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0613%4 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0313%4 Oct →
dust213–90.0022%3 Oct →
cache9–130.0219%3 Oct →
dust28–130.1026%2 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0414%2 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0424%2 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0518%1 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0116%1 Oct →
ancient4–130.027%1 Oct →
cache11–70.0817%1 Oct →
mirage10–130.0416%1 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0114%29 Sept →
dust216–140.0318%29 Sept →
nuke13–100.0516%27 Sept →
cache13–50.0416%27 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0110%27 Sept →
inferno9–130.0219%26 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0125%26 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.070%25 Sept →
dust216–140.0219%25 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0122%23 Sept →
nuke14–160.0112%23 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.027%23 Sept →
cache15–19-0.0516%23 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0610%23 Sept →
cache13–50.0227%23 Sept →
mirage16–140.0312%23 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0124%23 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0319%23 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.048%20 Sept →
dust213–40.1119%20 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0320%20 Sept →
dust215–150.0116%17 Sept →
inferno11–130.0315%17 Sept →
cache13–60.1227%17 Sept →
cache9–13-0.016%17 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.0213%16 Sept →
inferno13–10.0617%16 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0312%16 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0910%16 Sept →
cache13–110.0919%16 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0613%15 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0522%15 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0416%15 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0218%15 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0316%15 Sept →
ancient16–12-0.0113%14 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0618%14 Sept →
dust213–110.0730%14 Sept →
ancient9–130.0414%14 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0316%14 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0213%13 Sept →
dust216–120.0217%13 Sept →
inferno13–100.0221%13 Sept →
dust213–70.0215%13 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0416%11 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0212%10 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.047%10 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0222%10 Sept →
cache13–30.0317%10 Sept →
dust216–120.0113%10 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0013%7 Sept →
ancient13–80.129%7 Sept →
ancient13–80.0815%7 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0414%7 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0514%7 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0213%7 Sept →
inferno13–50.1113%7 Sept →
ancient13–30.0523%6 Sept →
inferno15–150.0212%6 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0318%6 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.035%6 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0010%31 Aug →
cache13–5-0.0215%30 Aug →
anubis13–80.0113%30 Aug →
ancient13–40.1017%30 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0210%30 Aug →
dust210–130.0214%30 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.