huuq0

huuq0 — CS2 Stats

FI76561198072982082[U:1:112716354]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,396Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,002Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate39.2%45.7%46.8%7.6% short
Shot accuracy19.6%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.031.051.060.03 short
Match win rate46.7%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhuuq0FACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning59
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–47Last 10053%Win rateWLLLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · +80ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 707ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 662ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim4.6
Utility5.2
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 5% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 630ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning5.9
Utility5.2
Mechanics3.8
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time632ms+26ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 632ms
Headshot accuracy13.9%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 13.5% → last ⅓ avg 13.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 16–3 · overpass, 31 May →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 16–13 · mirage, 3 Jun →
469msFastest reaction time · 16–14 · dust2, 1 Jun →
16–0Biggest win · nuke, 5 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
95Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2714–1352%0.01
infernoC167–944%0.01
vertigoB136–746%0.01
nukeB137–654%0.02
dust2A95–456%0.03
ancientA85–363%-0.02
overpassB84–450%0.04
anubisS54–180%0.01
office—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

100,077Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
4,909Matches
46.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
39.2%Headshot %
19.6%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 7 players
12,944MVPs
2,002Hours (in match)
5,538Bombs planted
1,203Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,967
AWP8,538
Knife4,468
P2501,946
SSG 081,854
MP91,799

Lifetime map wins

6,211dust2
6,002nuke
4,799inferno
3,332vertigo
1,615cbble
1,291train
1,227office
688assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

291Matches
56%Win rate
1.53Avg K/D
78.6ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
3%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1136%0.9515.0
Ancient838%0.9515.1
Dust2743%1.6514.6
Train450%1.5020.3
Vertigo30%0.9519.7
Inferno20%0.8213.0
Nuke20%1.1720.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.4%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
67.0%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
630msReaction time
5.1%T opening success
55.4%CT opening success
0.34Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
8.60HE damage / grenade
14.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.4388% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3434 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 5.1222% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–90.1922%21 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.0414%4 Jan →
mirage11–13-0.0111%4 Jan →
ancient9–13-0.0221%3 Jan →
dust213–30.0821%30 Dec →
inferno10–160.067%21 Aug →
vertigo12–16-0.018%18 Jun →
inferno22–200.0714%16 Jun →
mirage8–16-0.0218%16 Jun →
mirage25–230.0410%13 Jun →
nuke14–16-0.0315%12 Jun →
anubis19–16-0.0219%12 Jun →
overpass22–20-0.056%12 Jun →
overpass12–160.0016%11 Jun →
ancient6–16-0.0113%11 Jun →
inferno16–130.0412%11 Jun →
vertigo16–190.0110%10 Jun →
nuke14–16-0.0013%10 Jun →
vertigo12–160.0211%10 Jun →
office16–130.0513%9 Jun →
ancient16–60.035%9 Jun →
mirage16–12-0.039%9 Jun →
nuke16–140.0615%9 Jun →
vertigo16–110.0410%9 Jun →
mirage16–12-0.0226%8 Jun →
vertigo16–130.0515%8 Jun →
mirage16–14-0.0310%8 Jun →
nuke19–16-0.0115%8 Jun →
vertigo9–16-0.0729%7 Jun →
nuke13–16-0.039%7 Jun →
inferno3–16-0.0115%7 Jun →
inferno17–19-0.0519%7 Jun →
ancient16–10-0.0413%7 Jun →
nuke11–16-0.0013%7 Jun →
nuke11–160.0111%7 Jun →
vertigo7–160.0313%6 Jun →
anubis16–100.0011%6 Jun →
nuke16–120.069%6 Jun →
anubis16–70.0715%6 Jun →
mirage16–140.028%6 Jun →
overpass16–19-0.0216%6 Jun →
vertigo16–10-0.0220%6 Jun →
ancient16–10-0.0214%6 Jun →
nuke16–110.0013%6 Jun →
mirage12–16-0.0712%5 Jun →
inferno10–16-0.0412%5 Jun →
mirage16–19-0.0513%5 Jun →
inferno13–16-0.0211%5 Jun →
nuke16–00.1011%5 Jun →
inferno11–160.0621%5 Jun →
ancient16–14-0.0314%5 Jun →
mirage13–16-0.0315%4 Jun →
mirage8–16-0.0414%4 Jun →
inferno4–16-0.0614%4 Jun →
dust214–160.0013%4 Jun →
vertigo16–50.0010%4 Jun →
ancient16–110.0311%4 Jun →
mirage16–10-0.0211%3 Jun →
overpass14–160.0515%3 Jun →
mirage13–160.0023%3 Jun →
mirage16–130.0129%3 Jun →
inferno16–190.0117%3 Jun →
dust216–70.1120%3 Jun →
mirage16–40.0724%3 Jun →
inferno19–170.0117%2 Jun →
mirage13–160.0119%2 Jun →
mirage16–140.018%2 Jun →
vertigo22–180.0717%1 Jun →
inferno16–110.0322%1 Jun →
nuke16–70.047%1 Jun →
vertigo16–60.0719%1 Jun →
anubis8–16-0.046%1 Jun →
dust216–14-0.048%1 Jun →
mirage16–80.0214%1 Jun →
inferno16–8-0.0022%31 May →
mirage16–130.0415%31 May →
overpass16–30.2211%31 May →
dust214–160.0812%31 May →
dust216–13-0.0210%31 May →
inferno16–50.019%31 May →
vertigo14–16-0.0210%31 May →
dust214–16-0.0213%31 May →
mirage10–16-0.0122%31 May →
overpass16–120.0710%31 May →
mirage16–130.1310%30 May →
overpass16–130.0012%30 May →
nuke15–19-0.029%30 May →
nuke16–80.028%30 May →
vertigo6–160.0023%30 May →
inferno16–130.0324%30 May →
mirage10–160.0219%30 May →
inferno13–16-0.0011%30 May →
dust216–100.0512%30 May →
mirage12–160.0216%29 May →
anubis16–50.0313%29 May →
dust29–16-0.0018%29 May →
overpass14–160.0211%29 May →
ancient12–16-0.096%28 May →
mirage7–16-0.0712%28 May →
mirage16–120.0316%27 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.