isak — CS2 Stats

PROMetizportSwedenRiflerSettings & gear profile →

76561198071910365[U:1:111644637]

2,867Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating8.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

CSDB Leaderboard#11364 of 13786 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 3,089 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,089 +0 27 Aug – 28 Aug · 2 observations

3,089Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

2Days observed since 2026-08-27

Faceit ELO

At peak — 3,089
Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 — 411 to go
Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93

Positioning66

Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61–39Last 10061%Win rateLWLLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.3

Aggression9.4

Utility5.6

Positioning6.6

Opening Duels4.7

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3

Positioning6.6

Utility5.6

Mechanics8.5

Opening Duels4.7

Win Impact9.4

Composite 8.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time545ms+34ms

first ⅓ avg 511ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms

Headshot accuracy19.0%+0.2%

first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — mirage 13–9

13–0Biggest win — overpass

10Longest win streak

11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 16mirageWeakest map · 52% over 25

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	25	13–12	52%	0.01
overpass	S	18	12–6	67%	0.02
nuke	A	16	10–6	63%	-0.00
ancient	S	16	11–5	69%	0.01
inferno	B	13	7–6	54%	-0.00
dust2	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.02
anubis	—	3	3–0	100%	0.08
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (52% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,851Matches

59%Win rate

1.24Avg K/D

83.9ADR

55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

21Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	181	64%	1.29	17.0
Ancient	131	63%	1.35	17.1
Anubis	64	62%	1.19	17.6
Dust2	43	60%	1.11	16.9
Nuke	40	58%	1.18	15.2
Overpass	30	53%	1.13	17.0
Vertigo	25	72%	1.47	16.3
Inferno	25	48%	1.08	15.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy

44.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

49.5%Spray accuracy

88.2%Counter-strafing

9.5°Preaim

543msReaction time

38.0%T opening success

59.4%CT opening success

0.61Enemies flashed / flash

8.4%Flash assists

6.57HE damage / grenade

7.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.0146% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	11–13	-0.04	16%	14 Jun →
anubis	13–5	0.07	16%	14 Jun →
nuke	15–19	-0.04	13%	14 Jun →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	16%	14 Jun →
anubis	13–5	0.07	16%	14 Jun →
nuke	15–19	-0.04	13%	14 Jun →
overpass	13–7	0.02	9%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.02	29%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.02	29%	14 Jun →
overpass	13–7	0.02	9%	14 Jun →
overpass	13–0	0.10	17%	13 Jun →
inferno	13–3	0.03	27%	13 Jun →
inferno	13–3	0.03	27%	13 Jun →
overpass	13–0	0.10	17%	13 Jun →
nuke	28–26	0.05	20%	13 Jun →
overpass	13–7	0.01	28%	13 Jun →
mirage	14–16	0.03	12%	13 Jun →
overpass	13–7	0.01	28%	13 Jun →
mirage	14–16	0.03	12%	13 Jun →
nuke	28–26	0.05	20%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.01	19%	13 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.03	18%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.01	19%	13 Jun →
nuke	2–13	-0.09	20%	21 May →
overpass	9–13	-0.07	7%	21 May →
overpass	8–13	0.01	15%	21 May →
dust2	13–6	-0.05	22%	21 Apr →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	25%	19 Apr →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	24%	16 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.18	30%	16 Apr →
dust2	16–14	0.05	25%	16 Apr →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	18%	16 Apr →
dust2	5–13	-0.11	13%	16 Apr →
nuke	13–9	0.04	34%	16 Apr →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	37%	16 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.07	39%	15 Apr →
anubis	13–8	0.08	24%	14 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.04	35%	14 Apr →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	27%	14 Apr →
overpass	13–9	-0.01	19%	14 Apr →
ancient	13–8	0.08	39%	13 Apr →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	14%	13 Apr →
mirage	8–13	0.02	39%	13 Apr →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	42%	13 Apr →
vertigo	13–9	0.06	23%	12 Apr →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	25%	12 Apr →
ancient	13–7	0.07	31%	12 Apr →
mirage	13–1	0.07	30%	12 Apr →
mirage	13–8	0.04	29%	11 Apr →
ancient	3–13	-0.03	28%	11 Apr →
inferno	13–5	-0.01	10%	11 Apr →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	28%	11 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.01	15%	7 Apr →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	20%	7 Apr →
mirage	16–13	0.06	15%	6 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.06	28%	6 Apr →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	33%	5 Apr →
inferno	13–10	0.01	19%	4 Apr →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	31%	4 Apr →
mirage	4–13	0.03	22%	4 Apr →
nuke	2–13	-0.02	24%	2 Apr →
overpass	13–4	0.07	20%	1 Apr →
ancient	13–10	0.08	14%	30 Mar →
vertigo	8–13	0.03	27%	30 Mar →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	14%	30 Mar →
ancient	16–13	0.08	22%	29 Mar →
mirage	13–4	0.06	19%	29 Mar →
nuke	13–2	-0.01	18%	29 Mar →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	22%	29 Mar →
overpass	11–13	0.01	23%	29 Mar →
overpass	4–13	0.01	26%	27 Mar →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	24%	27 Mar →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	24%	27 Mar →
overpass	4–13	0.01	26%	27 Mar →
inferno	13–11	0.00	17%	23 Mar →
ancient	13–9	0.01	15%	23 Mar →
inferno	13–11	0.00	17%	23 Mar →
ancient	13–9	0.01	15%	23 Mar →
inferno	17–19	0.01	22%	23 Mar →
mirage	10–13	-0.08	7%	23 Mar →
mirage	10–13	-0.08	7%	23 Mar →
inferno	17–19	0.01	22%	23 Mar →
inferno	8–13	0.00	22%	23 Mar →
ancient	13–7	0.06	21%	23 Mar →
overpass	13–10	0.03	18%	23 Mar →
overpass	13–10	0.03	18%	23 Mar →
inferno	8–13	0.00	22%	23 Mar →
ancient	13–7	0.06	21%	23 Mar →
ancient	2–13	-0.08	20%	15 Mar →
nuke	13–10	0.02	20%	15 Mar →
overpass	11–13	0.01	29%	15 Mar →
overpass	13–6	0.02	9%	15 Mar →
nuke	19–16	0.03	25%	14 Mar →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	19%	14 Mar →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	11%	12 Mar →
nuke	13–5	0.07	20%	12 Mar →
overpass	16–14	0.00	23%	12 Mar →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	18%	10 Mar →
ancient	5–13	-0.08	14%	10 Mar →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	7%	10 Mar →