stanislaw

stanislaw — CS2 Stats

PRO“21”MetizportCanadaIGLSettings & gear profile →

76561197981849043[U:1:21583315]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,089Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,962 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,962 → 2,962
+4Tracked matches · now 2,089
−6.7ppWin rate · 66.7% → 60.0%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,962 +0 28 Aug – 1 Oct · 14 observations
2,9622,962peak 2,96228 Aug1 Oct
2,962Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-06-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,962
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 38 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGstanislawFACEITLevel 10 · 2,962 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,962csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning48
Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY62–38Last 10062%Win rateLWLWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · −11ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 445ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 460ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 466ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.3 against its own average).

Aim9.2
Utility7.7
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning4.8
Utility7.7
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time474ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 531ms → last ⅓ avg 474ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–9 · anubis, 2 Sept →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · nuke, 28 Aug →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · anubis, 27 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · overpass, 13 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
15–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 100% over 6cacheWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2615–1158%-0.01
mirageA2012–860%-0.02
infernoA1811–761%-0.01
anubisA117–464%0.00
ancientA117–464%-0.02
cacheC73–443%-0.01
overpassS66–0100%0.03
dust2—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,694Matches
64%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
80.0ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15864%1.2216.8
Ancient10167%1.2914.9
Dust29966%1.3316.7
Anubis6965%1.2515.3
Inferno5463%1.1714.3
Nuke4360%1.1314.6
Overpass3077%1.2414.4
Vertigo2976%1.1715.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.2%Spray accuracy
85.8%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
471msReaction time
39.4%T opening success
35.8%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
12.0%Flash assists
8.88HE damage / grenade
17.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.3983% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache6–130.0122%7 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0117%7 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0428%7 Oct →
anubis13–90.0029%27 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0020%27 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0321%26 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0114%26 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0515%26 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0117%25 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0622%25 Sept →
inferno13–60.0121%25 Sept →
nuke13–80.0418%25 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0221%25 Sept →
mirage13–20.0624%25 Sept →
nuke13–50.0620%17 Sept →
anubis9–130.0331%17 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0525%17 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0619%17 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0819%17 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0321%14 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0220%14 Sept →
inferno13–90.0324%13 Sept →
cache13–60.0412%13 Sept →
nuke14–160.0021%13 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0510%11 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0128%11 Sept →
ancient13–110.0232%5 Sept →
nuke25–23-0.0215%5 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.0222%4 Sept →
cache16–13-0.0436%4 Sept →
inferno13–60.0133%2 Sept →
anubis13–90.0917%2 Sept →
nuke13–90.0021%1 Sept →
anubis13–70.0130%1 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0128%1 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0428%31 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0117%31 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0420%31 Aug →
nuke13–70.0020%31 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0217%31 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0745%28 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0023%28 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0610%20 Aug →
nuke13–110.0720%20 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0316%20 Aug →
mirage13–110.0530%20 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0022%20 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0014%20 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0316%19 Aug →
anubis13–70.0326%19 Aug →
nuke6–130.0120%18 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0718%18 Aug →
inferno13–60.0130%18 Aug →
nuke13–30.0724%18 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0335%18 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0316%8 Aug →
ancient13–2-0.0120%8 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0426%8 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0323%8 Aug →
cache9–130.0025%8 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0121%7 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0317%7 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.0621%3 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0811%3 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0320%3 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.0621%3 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0811%3 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0320%3 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0422%3 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0619%3 Aug →
ancient13–20.0313%3 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0619%3 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0422%3 Aug →
ancient13–20.0313%3 Aug →
mirage13–110.0621%3 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0115%3 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0115%3 Aug →
mirage13–110.0621%3 Aug →
dust219–170.0523%13 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0214%14 Jun →
anubis13–50.0119%14 Jun →
nuke15–19-0.0417%14 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0214%14 Jun →
anubis13–50.0119%14 Jun →
nuke15–19-0.0417%14 Jun →
overpass13–70.0422%14 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.0116%14 Jun →
mirage13–6-0.0116%14 Jun →
overpass13–70.0422%14 Jun →
overpass13–00.0525%13 Jun →
inferno13–30.0117%13 Jun →
inferno13–30.0117%13 Jun →
overpass13–00.0525%13 Jun →
nuke28–26-0.0321%13 Jun →
overpass13–70.0123%13 Jun →
mirage14–16-0.0516%13 Jun →
overpass13–70.0123%13 Jun →
mirage14–16-0.0516%13 Jun →
nuke28–26-0.0321%13 Jun →
nuke13–100.0116%13 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches10-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.