stanislaw

stanislaw — CS2 Stats

PRORobotMetizportCanadaIGLSettings & gear profile →

76561197981849043[U:1:21583315]Steam profile ↗

2,040Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#9809 of 11779 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,962 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2,962Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,962
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 38 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGstanislawFACEITLevel 10 · 2,962 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,962csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning42
Utility82

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT5941Last 10059%Win rateWWLWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim8.9
Aggression1.4
Utility8.2
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Utility. Utility score of 82 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 47 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning4.2
Utility8.2
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time480ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 539ms → last ⅓ avg 480ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.07Best rating — nuke 13–11
130Biggest win — overpass
10Longest win streak
W2Current streak
147In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 15mirageWeakest map · 50% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2011955%-0.01
mirageB20101050%-0.02
infernoB1910953%-0.02
ancientS1512380%-0.02
overpassS1510567%0.00
anubisS64267%-0.01
dust231233%-0.02
cache21150%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,687Matches
64%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
80.2ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15764%1.2116.8
Ancient10067%1.2914.9
Dust29966%1.3316.7
Anubis6965%1.2515.3
Inferno5263%1.1414.2
Nuke4161%1.1514.9
Overpass3077%1.2414.4
Vertigo2976%1.1715.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.9%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
480msReaction time
17.8%T opening success
37.2%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
11.5%Flash assists
10.37HE damage / grenade
19.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.8094% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–14-0.0610%20 Aug
nuke13–110.0720%20 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0316%20 Aug
mirage13–110.0530%20 Aug
cache13–11-0.0022%20 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0014%20 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0316%19 Aug
anubis13–70.0326%19 Aug
nuke6–130.0120%18 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0718%18 Aug
inferno13–60.0130%18 Aug
nuke13–30.0724%18 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0335%18 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0316%8 Aug
ancient13–2-0.0120%8 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0426%8 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0323%8 Aug
cache9–130.0025%8 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0121%7 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0317%7 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0621%3 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0811%3 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0320%3 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0621%3 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0811%3 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0320%3 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0422%3 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0619%3 Aug
ancient13–20.0313%3 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0619%3 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0422%3 Aug
ancient13–20.0313%3 Aug
mirage13–110.0621%3 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0115%3 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0115%3 Aug
mirage13–110.0621%3 Aug
dust219–170.0523%13 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0214%14 Jun
anubis13–50.0119%14 Jun
nuke15–19-0.0417%14 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0214%14 Jun
anubis13–50.0119%14 Jun
nuke15–19-0.0417%14 Jun
overpass13–70.0422%14 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0116%14 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0116%14 Jun
overpass13–70.0422%14 Jun
overpass13–00.0525%13 Jun
inferno13–30.0117%13 Jun
inferno13–30.0117%13 Jun
overpass13–00.0525%13 Jun
nuke28–26-0.0321%13 Jun
overpass13–70.0123%13 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0516%13 Jun
overpass13–70.0123%13 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0516%13 Jun
nuke28–26-0.0321%13 Jun
mirage13–110.0232%13 Jun
nuke13–100.0116%13 Jun
mirage13–110.0232%13 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0818%21 May
overpass9–130.0119%21 May
overpass8–13-0.0529%21 May
inferno13–90.0121%16 Apr
dust25–13-0.0216%16 Apr
nuke13–90.0220%16 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0218%16 Apr
nuke13–90.0626%14 Apr
overpass13–90.0126%14 Apr
nuke13–100.0523%13 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0619%13 Apr
ancient13–8-0.0511%13 Apr
inferno13–50.0414%11 Apr
ancient13–5-0.0533%11 Apr
inferno13–100.0125%4 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0320%4 Apr
mirage4–13-0.1031%4 Apr
nuke2–13-0.1033%2 Apr
overpass13–40.0225%1 Apr
nuke13–20.0332%29 Mar
dust28–13-0.0825%29 Mar
overpass11–13-0.0313%29 Mar
overpass4–13-0.0429%27 Mar
mirage7–130.0214%27 Mar
mirage7–130.0214%27 Mar
overpass4–13-0.0429%27 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0526%23 Mar
ancient13–9-0.059%23 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0526%23 Mar
ancient13–9-0.059%23 Mar
inferno17–19-0.0123%23 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0520%23 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0520%23 Mar
inferno17–19-0.0123%23 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0924%23 Mar
ancient13–7-0.0117%23 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0519%23 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0519%23 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0924%23 Mar
ancient13–7-0.0117%23 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →