annex

annex — CS2 Stats

VA76561198071631368[U:1:111365640]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

265Tracked matches34%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,400Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,671Top 50% of 211,827 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#60397 of 258787 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (41 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 265 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,671 +2,651 16 Apr – 19 Sept · 12 days played
19,02024,016peak 24,01616 Apr19 Sept
24,048Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2025-04-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,345 below peak (24,016)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,329 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate43.9%46.8%48.2%4.3% short
Shot accuracy14.9%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.221.061.07above
Match win rate49.8%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGannexFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,671 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning54
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–47–5Last 10048%Win rateLTLLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +4.2pp headshot accuracy · +58ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–4–1 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 615ms

Last 20

  • 5–14–1 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility4.3
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.1

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning5.4
Utility4.3
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time603ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 7–1 · mirage, 9 Apr →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · mirage, 30 Mar →
414msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · anubis, 8 Apr →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 27 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 89% over 9anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2810–1836%-0.01
mirageB1910–953%0.02
anubisD124–833%-0.03
nukeB126–650%0.02
overpassS98–189%-0.01
cacheB63–350%-0.01
ancientC52–340%0.01
inferno—32–167%0.02
jura—22–0100%0.01
warden—10–10%-0.06
alpine—10–10%-0.08
office—10–10%-0.05
train—11–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

69,793Lifetime kills
1.22K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
2,886Matches
49.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
43.9%Headshot %
14.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
6,610MVPs
1,400Hours (in match)
3,046Bombs planted
864Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4720,511
AWP8,510
P2502,498
Tec-91,868
Knife1,441

Lifetime map wins

5,093dust2
3,802inferno
1,704nuke
1,267cbble
934train
765vertigo
233office
50aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

628Matches
54%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
—ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7100%1.5614.0
Anubis650%1.0110.3
Vertigo5100%0.9511.0
Overpass475%1.3511.5
Nuke250%0.7714.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.3%Spray accuracy
75.5%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
589msReaction time
27.3%T opening success
46.0%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
8.12HE damage / grenade
4.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.2851% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache4–13-0.0716%1 Jun →
cache12–120.0315%31 May →
anubis8–13-0.0224%31 May →
anubis9–13-0.0524%31 May →
anubis4–130.0113%31 May →
cache13–100.0231%17 May →
inferno16–140.019%10 May →
nuke3–13-0.0829%10 May →
cache13–50.0625%30 Apr →
cache13–9-0.0220%30 Apr →
cache5–13-0.068%29 Apr →
anubis7–13-0.0522%28 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0236%28 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.0517%28 Apr →
anubis13–160.0117%22 Apr →
ancient9–130.0210%18 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0413%18 Apr →
mirage7–10.1716%9 Apr →
anubis9–13-0.0616%8 Apr →
anubis5–13-0.077%8 Apr →
mirage13–80.0618%8 Apr →
overpass16–140.0512%7 Apr →
mirage8–130.0116%7 Apr →
inferno9–00.0822%7 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0129%6 Apr →
nuke13–60.0514%5 Apr →
overpass13–11-0.0310%3 Apr →
dust26–13-0.0722%3 Apr →
mirage7–13-0.0410%3 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0419%3 Apr →
ancient9–10.0921%3 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0235%3 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0324%3 Apr →
mirage13–6-0.0219%3 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0614%2 Apr →
nuke13–30.0112%2 Apr →
nuke13–110.0120%1 Apr →
anubis13–6-0.0412%1 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0425%1 Apr →
warden1–13-0.060%1 Apr →
alpine7–13-0.0820%1 Apr →
dust213–9-0.0428%30 Mar →
mirage13–50.0538%30 Mar →
dust23–130.0124%30 Mar →
anubis13–11-0.0716%27 Mar →
dust214–16-0.0422%27 Mar →
mirage16–13-0.0123%7 Nov →
dust211–13-0.0216%4 Aug →
overpass13–9-0.0320%2 Aug →
dust213–50.0131%2 Aug →
overpass13–10-0.0428%31 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0314%30 Jul →
jura13–4-0.019%30 Jul →
jura11–10.0320%30 Jul →
nuke12–120.0721%29 Jul →
dust210–130.0031%29 Jul →
dust213–80.0218%28 Jul →
mirage13–50.0015%28 Jul →
ancient13–110.0016%28 Jul →
overpass13–20.1018%27 Jul →
dust213–00.0524%27 Jul →
overpass1–13-0.0512%27 Jul →
mirage5–00.019%27 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0123%27 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0524%27 Jul →
nuke13–80.0412%27 Jul →
overpass13–100.0315%27 Jul →
dust210–130.0222%26 Jul →
overpass13–9-0.0619%26 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0316%25 Jul →
nuke9–130.0311%25 Jul →
mirage0–7-0.0120%25 Jul →
dust212–120.0625%24 Jul →
nuke16–120.0612%20 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0225%18 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0416%18 Jul →
mirage13–60.0610%18 Jul →
overpass13–9-0.0315%18 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0416%18 Jul →
mirage13–40.1018%15 Jul →
dust213–100.0415%12 Jul →
anubis13–60.066%12 Jul →
dust212–120.0618%3 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0321%3 Jul →
nuke9–130.0418%3 Jul →
office11–13-0.0515%17 Apr →
mirage5–130.0025%17 Apr →
dust28–10.0418%17 Apr →
dust213–80.0430%16 Apr →
inferno1–5-0.0429%15 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0021%15 Apr →
nuke13–20.0720%15 Apr →
anubis0–9-0.0717%15 Apr →
train13–11-0.0315%13 Apr →
nuke12–12-0.0321%13 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0713%13 Apr →
anubis13–70.0014%13 Apr →
mirage5–10.1135%8 Apr →
dust213–10-0.0414%6 Apr →
mirage4–13-0.0224%6 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.