Snilf

Snilf — CS2 Stats

PM76561198070427509[U:1:110161781]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,664Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,605Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Aug 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+9Tracked matches · now 2,664
−3.3ppWin rate · 60.0% → 56.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 15 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,957 -1,150 15 Mar5 Jul · 22 days played
17,85721,540peak 21,54015 Mar5 Jul
21,540Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-03-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,086), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate38.7%46.8%48.3%9.6% short
Shot accuracy13.8%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.861.061.070.21 short
Match win rate39.0%46.3%46.9%8.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSnilfFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning46
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51481Last 10051%Win rateWLWWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · −135ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility5.7
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 582ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.6
Utility5.7
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time597ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 13–5 · overpass, 25 May
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · mirage, 28 Jun
406msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 11 Jul
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 2 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 8mirageWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB28151354%-0.01
infernoB23121152%-0.01
mirageD1551033%-0.03
overpassB105550%-0.01
dust2B84450%-0.03
anubisA85363%-0.01
nukeA53260%-0.03
cache32167%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

101,580Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
5,435Matches
39.0%Match win rate
38.7%Headshot %
13.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
9,040MVPs
3,343Hours (in match)
4,077Bombs planted
1,517Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,808
AWP5,534
MAC-102,910
FAMAS2,382
P2502,349
MP92,333

Lifetime map wins

8,118inferno
5,459dust2
2,797train
2,575nuke
1,500vertigo
627cbble
233lake
119office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

362Matches
54%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
71.5ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5655%0.8813.0
Ancient5456%0.9213.1
Inferno4959%0.9714.3
Anubis4245%0.9115.0
Dust22850%0.8313.3
Nuke1464%1.1314.1
Overpass1155%0.8713.9
Cache1050%0.7913.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.9%Spray accuracy
70.2%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
582msReaction time
28.4%T opening success
46.9%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
10.66HE damage / grenade
6.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.4432% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–110.0327%5 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0216%5 Sept
inferno13–80.0311%24 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0418%22 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0313%22 Aug
inferno13–60.0317%22 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0117%19 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0516%15 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0720%15 Aug
cache13–11-0.0310%12 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0311%11 Aug
dust27–13-0.036%1 Aug
ancient16–19-0.0412%28 Jul
anubis5–13-0.056%28 Jul
nuke13–7-0.065%26 Jul
cache13–9-0.0126%26 Jul
ancient13–80.0528%26 Jul
mirage13–20.0228%26 Jul
inferno19–15-0.0019%25 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0013%11 Jul
ancient13–110.0419%11 Jul
mirage5–130.0310%5 Jul
ancient13–60.0118%4 Jul
mirage9–13-0.077%4 Jul
overpass0–13-0.0513%4 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0410%4 Jul
overpass13–11-0.0015%3 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0110%3 Jul
ancient2–130.0223%1 Jul
overpass5–13-0.0413%1 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0719%1 Jul
inferno13–10-0.017%1 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0132%1 Jul
mirage13–50.0036%28 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0311%28 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0221%28 Jun
mirage10–130.0115%28 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0614%28 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0114%14 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0725%14 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0013%14 Jun
inferno8–13-0.077%10 Jun
dust213–80.0113%10 Jun
ancient13–80.0014%10 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0021%3 Jun
overpass9–130.0310%3 Jun
inferno13–90.017%3 Jun
overpass13–50.0727%25 May
ancient8–13-0.028%25 May
mirage13–40.0328%25 May
anubis13–90.0319%25 May
ancient10–13-0.0519%25 May
inferno13–70.0212%22 May
dust27–13-0.0620%22 May
ancient13–8-0.0318%22 May
inferno13–70.0422%22 May
mirage5–13-0.099%13 May
inferno8–130.0513%13 May
cache7–13-0.0215%13 May
inferno11–13-0.058%28 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0410%28 Apr
overpass13–7-0.0021%28 Apr
dust213–11-0.0118%27 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0318%27 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0421%18 Apr
ancient13–100.0217%18 Apr
ancient15–15-0.0220%18 Apr
dust210–13-0.0718%18 Apr
nuke13–9-0.066%12 Apr
inferno16–14-0.019%12 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0921%8 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0311%8 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0416%8 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0318%8 Apr
overpass13–60.0422%8 Apr
nuke13–80.0520%4 Apr
inferno12–4-0.0212%4 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0019%4 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0220%4 Apr
anubis13–90.0013%2 Apr
ancient13–1-0.0110%2 Apr
dust213–8-0.0513%2 Apr
dust214–16-0.0812%30 Mar
mirage4–13-0.047%30 Mar
overpass8–13-0.0914%30 Mar
ancient13–9-0.0024%30 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0321%30 Mar
inferno14–16-0.029%28 Mar
inferno6–90.009%28 Mar
ancient2–13-0.080%25 Mar
overpass11–13-0.0716%25 Mar
inferno13–70.0216%21 Mar
ancient13–16-0.0620%21 Mar
ancient6–130.0612%21 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0121%15 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0018%15 Mar
ancient13–90.0210%15 Mar
overpass13–90.0013%15 Mar
inferno11–130.0113%15 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0620%15 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →