𝗡𝗢𝗠𝗘𝗥𝗖𝗬𝗞 — CS2 Stats

76561198068241682[U:1:107975954]

746Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongEntry Fragger
Premier CS Rating26,941Top 10% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1941 of 47586 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG𝗡𝗢𝗠𝗘𝗥𝗖𝗬𝗞FACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,941 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim97
Positioning60
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49501Last 10049%Win rateLLLLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim9.7
Aggression10.0
Utility4.8
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels6.0
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: higher opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 97 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 67% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 67% on CT to 41% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.7
Positioning6.0
Utility4.8
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels6.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.08+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg 0.08
Reaction time486ms−85ms
first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 486ms
Headshot accuracy27.1%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 27.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — dust2 13–2
131Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 69% over 29infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB35161946%0.07
dust2S2920969%0.08
anubisC125742%0.07
ancientC94544%0.08
infernoD72529%0.04
nuke4040%0.01
cache21150%0.05
overpass21150%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,334Matches
52%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
88.9ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15055%1.1818.2
Dust27453%1.1717.6
Anubis5153%1.1516.8
Ancient3850%1.1216.1
Overpass1553%1.3519.5
Inferno1573%1.4720.4
Nuke1540%1.2118.1
Vertigo944%0.9816.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.2%Headshot accuracy
44.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
87.1%Counter-strafing
6.8°Preaim
486msReaction time
41.3%T opening success
67.1%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
14.28HE damage / grenade
2.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.4117 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno5–130.0429%28 Aug
dust24–130.0028%28 Aug
mirage6–130.0915%28 Aug
dust210–130.0525%28 Aug
dust213–80.0937%27 Aug
anubis13–60.0536%27 Aug
mirage14–160.2126%27 Aug
dust213–110.0219%26 Aug
mirage13–30.1833%26 Aug
ancient9–130.0826%26 Aug
anubis7–130.1029%26 Aug
anubis16–120.1232%26 Aug
mirage13–90.0033%26 Aug
mirage13–10.1116%26 Aug
mirage13–70.1617%26 Aug
mirage10–130.0518%25 Aug
dust213–110.1736%25 Aug
dust213–90.0926%25 Aug
ancient6–130.0517%25 Aug
mirage8–130.0519%24 Aug
mirage13–60.1236%24 Aug
ancient13–20.1127%24 Aug
dust213–70.0333%24 Aug
anubis6–130.1013%21 Aug
dust213–60.1632%21 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0138%21 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0831%21 Aug
dust213–3-0.0024%21 Aug
dust213–40.1737%21 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0227%21 Aug
mirage13–80.0426%21 Aug
mirage9–130.0831%21 Aug
dust213–80.1323%21 Aug
mirage13–50.1221%19 Aug
dust213–10.0724%19 Aug
inferno13–70.1033%19 Aug
anubis13–40.0735%19 Aug
mirage13–60.0522%18 Aug
mirage10–130.0719%18 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0223%18 Aug
mirage8–130.0242%18 Aug
anubis4–130.0328%17 Aug
dust29–130.0635%17 Aug
mirage8–130.1027%17 Aug
ancient13–60.1725%17 Aug
dust214–160.1321%16 Aug
dust210–130.1027%16 Aug
mirage13–50.1415%16 Aug
ancient13–80.0826%16 Aug
mirage13–80.0526%16 Aug
mirage5–130.0318%16 Aug
anubis6–130.0218%12 Aug
anubis13–70.0530%12 Aug
mirage13–60.1221%11 Aug
mirage16–140.1523%10 Aug
dust213–100.0212%10 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0738%10 Aug
dust211–130.1117%9 Aug
mirage13–110.1225%9 Aug
inferno4–13-0.029%5 Aug
dust213–50.0732%5 Aug
dust213–10-0.0231%4 Aug
inferno13–90.1137%4 Aug
mirage14–160.0730%3 Aug
mirage13–110.0721%3 Aug
cache10–130.0328%2 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0732%1 Aug
inferno7–130.0320%25 Jul
nuke13–160.0924%25 Jul
dust213–20.2326%24 Jul
cache13–90.0715%24 Jul
dust213–50.0623%24 Jul
mirage13–40.1827%24 Jul
dust27–130.0723%23 Jul
anubis13–30.1819%23 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0018%18 Jul
nuke4–130.0928%18 Jul
ancient8–130.1629%11 Jul
mirage10–130.0828%11 Jul
anubis6–130.0919%11 Jul
mirage4–130.1321%11 Jul
dust213–110.1317%11 Jul
mirage6–130.1024%11 Jul
anubis11–130.0814%10 Jul
ancient9–130.0020%10 Jul
dust213–70.1546%10 Jul
dust213–10-0.0115%10 Jul
dust213–70.1515%5 Jul
dust210–130.0417%5 Jul
inferno7–130.0829%12 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0818%24 May
mirage1–13-0.0420%24 May
nuke8–13-0.0723%22 May
overpass13–80.0327%16 May
mirage5–13-0.0122%16 May
overpass15–150.0528%16 May
dust24–130.0129%14 May
mirage13–7-0.0420%14 May
dust213–20.0929%14 May
ancient4–00.0650%14 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →