P4SY — CS2 Stats

76561198067453093[U:1:107187365]

1,881Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,422Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6408 of 29682 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,603 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGP4SYFACEITLevel 8 · 1,603 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,422 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning63
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56431Last 10056%Win rateWWWLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.5
Aggression9.7
Utility4.9
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning6.3
Utility4.9
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time544ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — anubis 13–2
130Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
710In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 15mirageWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA26161062%0.05
ancientA2516964%0.04
infernoC1771041%0.02
nukeS1510567%0.02
mirageD72529%0.03
dust2C52340%-0.01
overpass43175%0.02
cache1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

73Matches
71%Win rate
1.36Avg K/D
100.7ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2167%1.1916.9
Anubis1681%1.3817.9
Inferno1464%1.3317.2
Dust2560%1.5416.8
Nuke4100%2.4721.8
Mirage450%1.1618.5
Overpass2100%1.1417.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
43.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.2%Spray accuracy
88.4%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
538msReaction time
37.4%T opening success
55.7%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
7.45HE damage / grenade
12.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.3952% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–130.0213%27 Aug
ancient13–70.0719%27 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0115%26 Aug
dust28–130.0121%26 Aug
anubis13–50.1223%25 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0427%25 Aug
nuke13–20.1433%25 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0818%25 Aug
anubis13–20.2142%24 Aug
ancient13–30.1726%24 Aug
inferno6–130.0526%24 Aug
anubis13–70.0316%22 Aug
inferno13–00.1121%22 Aug
ancient13–70.0615%22 Aug
ancient13–00.0626%20 Aug
anubis13–4-0.025%20 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0319%7 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0321%7 Aug
ancient13–20.1219%7 Aug
dust25–13-0.1418%4 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0228%4 Aug
mirage13–50.1529%4 Aug
anubis13–80.1019%4 Aug
anubis10–13-0.039%4 Aug
anubis14–160.0619%3 Aug
ancient13–100.0421%30 Jul
mirage8–130.0015%30 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0131%30 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0533%30 Jul
nuke13–30.0933%29 Jul
nuke11–130.0523%29 Jul
anubis11–130.1020%29 Jul
ancient13–60.1221%29 Jul
inferno13–10.0433%29 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0214%28 Jul
dust213–100.0448%28 Jul
nuke4–130.0428%28 Jul
inferno13–50.0622%28 Jul
nuke13–50.0419%21 Jul
anubis13–100.1117%21 Jul
ancient13–40.0631%21 Jul
ancient16–130.0116%20 Jul
ancient13–110.0217%20 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0229%20 Jul
ancient6–130.0220%19 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0221%19 Jul
anubis13–100.1132%18 Jul
ancient9–130.0325%18 Jul
nuke13–30.0230%17 Jul
anubis13–110.0519%17 Jul
inferno13–10.0725%17 Jul
anubis13–110.0623%17 Jul
ancient13–20.1322%17 Jul
mirage2–130.0019%17 Jul
ancient11–130.0326%17 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0317%15 Jul
mirage11–130.0520%15 Jul
ancient7–130.0128%14 Jul
anubis13–10.0727%14 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0221%14 Jul
ancient13–100.0116%13 Jul
inferno13–20.1525%13 Jul
cache4–13-0.028%13 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0227%12 Jul
anubis13–10.0815%12 Jul
anubis13–20.0220%6 Jul
nuke13–110.0226%5 Jul
ancient13–80.0526%5 Jul
anubis2–130.0429%5 Jul
anubis13–70.1021%4 Jul
overpass13–10-0.0018%4 Jul
anubis9–130.0919%4 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0120%30 Jun
ancient2–13-0.098%30 Jun
ancient13–80.0923%28 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0016%28 Jun
anubis13–60.0517%28 Jun
overpass13–110.1117%24 Jun
inferno9–130.0520%24 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0216%23 Jun
nuke13–70.0825%23 Jun
nuke13–2-0.0426%23 Jun
dust210–13-0.0437%23 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0126%22 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0236%22 Jun
dust213–80.0623%22 Jun
overpass10–130.0213%22 Jun
ancient13–60.0227%16 Jun
nuke0–13-0.0243%16 Jun
inferno13–16-0.0016%16 Jun
anubis11–130.0219%16 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0319%15 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0613%15 Jun
nuke13–90.0811%15 Jun
ancient13–100.0326%15 Jun
anubis13–110.0816%11 Jun
inferno11–130.0217%11 Jun
ancient5–13-0.038%10 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0626%10 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0234%10 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →