Hoyo

Hoyo — CS2 Stats

76561198032732767[U:1:72467039]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,510Tracked matches73%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating21,441Top 50% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#60137 of 242416 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,868 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 14 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,441 +1,442 14 Aug – 23 Sept · 25 days played
16,13421,441peak 21,44114 Aug23 Sept
21,441Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,868Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-08-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,868
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 133 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,441
  • +4,342 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,559 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHoyoFACEITLevel 9 · 1,868 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,441 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,868csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning56
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT62–35–3Last 10062%Win rateWWWWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +7.4pp headshot accuracy · +22ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 665ms

Last 10

  • 9–1 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Last 20

  • 16–4 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.6
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.6
Utility5.6
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time620ms+20ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy26.5%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 26.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–1 · debris, 25 Aug →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · anubis, 23 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 17 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 22 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W6Current streak
4–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 86% over 7mirageWeakest map · 46% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2314–961%-0.01
anubisS1512–380%0.00
infernoB157–847%0.01
mirageB136–746%0.01
nukeS139–469%0.00
dust2A85–363%-0.02
cacheS76–186%0.02
debris—32–167%0.17
vertigo—10–10%-0.09
poseidon—11–0100%0.01
train—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

455Matches
56%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
73.9ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5560%1.0714.6
Nuke2969%1.0715.4
Anubis2264%1.0314.8
Inferno2050%0.9413.3
Dust21921%1.1016.3
Mirage1547%0.8813.3
Train5100%1.5616.8
Cache425%1.1919.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.4%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
597msReaction time
53.4%T opening success
41.8%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
10.35HE damage / grenade
10.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–30.0557%23 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0041%23 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0428%20 Sept →
anubis13–40.0218%20 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0526%20 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0314%20 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0420%20 Sept →
ancient13–110.0229%19 Sept →
ancient16–130.0233%19 Sept →
inferno13–60.0428%19 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0320%19 Sept →
anubis13–20.0315%18 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0711%18 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0122%18 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0132%18 Sept →
nuke13–80.0228%18 Sept →
inferno8–130.0225%18 Sept →
mirage13–100.0324%18 Sept →
dust29–130.0213%18 Sept →
inferno13–50.0329%18 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0028%17 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0232%17 Sept →
ancient13–90.0142%17 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0427%17 Sept →
mirage13–40.0218%17 Sept →
mirage16–140.0225%17 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0027%17 Sept →
cache13–30.0635%16 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0116%15 Sept →
cache13–50.0736%15 Sept →
dust216–130.0126%15 Sept →
mirage5–130.0032%13 Sept →
nuke12–160.0117%13 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0618%13 Sept →
nuke13–90.0240%11 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0350%8 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0426%8 Sept →
inferno13–40.0122%8 Sept →
debris3–9-0.0631%8 Sept →
vertigo8–8-0.0910%8 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0524%7 Sept →
ancient13–80.0116%7 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.029%7 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0319%7 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0321%3 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0725%3 Sept →
ancient13–50.0822%2 Sept →
inferno13–70.0323%2 Sept →
ancient11–130.0522%1 Sept →
nuke9–130.0316%1 Sept →
anubis13–60.0629%1 Sept →
ancient13–60.0425%1 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0212%31 Aug →
mirage13–90.0117%31 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0129%30 Aug →
ancient13–90.0128%30 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0719%30 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.0039%25 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.090%25 Aug →
nuke13–20.0453%25 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0221%25 Aug →
poseidon9–60.0132%25 Aug →
debris9–10.2921%25 Aug →
anubis13–20.0319%24 Aug →
ancient13–30.1036%24 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0231%24 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0523%23 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0115%23 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.048%23 Aug →
nuke13–50.0238%23 Aug →
anubis13–70.0216%22 Aug →
inferno13–00.1334%22 Aug →
ancient13–70.0625%22 Aug →
mirage9–130.0127%21 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0729%20 Aug →
anubis13–80.0319%20 Aug →
cache13–80.0226%20 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0326%20 Aug →
mirage9–130.0629%18 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0237%17 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.056%17 Aug →
mirage13–20.1233%17 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.094%16 Aug →
ancient13–2-0.0415%16 Aug →
inferno15–150.0422%16 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0514%16 Aug →
inferno13–80.0725%16 Aug →
nuke7–130.0330%16 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0527%16 Aug →
nuke15–15-0.0038%16 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0421%15 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0616%15 Aug →
debris9–40.2750%15 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0035%14 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0040%14 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0221%14 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0323%14 Aug →
train5–13-0.0132%14 Aug →
cache13–90.0213%14 Aug →
cache13–70.0216%14 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →