j-D

j-D — CS2 Stats

DE76561198039218708[U:1:78952980]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,431Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating24,080Top 25% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#29679 of 242316 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,988 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 24 days played since 20 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,080 +2,225 20 Jul18 Sept · 24 days played
20,60824,085peak 24,08520 Jul18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,988 +0 30 Aug4 Sept · 2 observations
1,9881,988peak 1,98830 Aug4 Sept
24,085Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,988Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-07-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,988
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 13 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 5 below peak (24,085)
  • +1,959 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 920 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGj-DFACEITLevel 9 · 1,988 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,080 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,988csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning53
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56404Last 10056%Win rateWWLWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −4.0pp headshot accuracy · −61ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 10

  • 91 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 1451 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.4
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch5.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.3
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time572ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–10 · anubis, 13 Sept
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · inferno, 28 Jul
406msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · mirage, 17 Aug
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 24 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
25In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 9infernoWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B178947%-0.00
cacheS139469%0.02
mirageB137654%0.01
ancientB136746%0.00
nukeS128467%0.02
infernoC125742%-0.01
anubisS97278%0.00
debris43175%-0.04
vertigo31233%0.05
poseidon21150%0.11
train21150%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

963Matches
50%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
94.4ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient13549%1.3319.8
Nuke10065%1.4620.2
Mirage7149%1.6120.6
Dust26038%1.2318.2
Anubis5648%1.1717.4
Inferno3644%1.1517.0
Train2162%1.4120.4
Vertigo1533%1.2218.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
40.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.7%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
551msReaction time
42.2%T opening success
38.8%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
8.92HE damage / grenade
7.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.8333% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–50.0110%18 Sept
nuke13–80.0119%18 Sept
inferno8–130.0115%18 Sept
cache13–30.0123%16 Sept
anubis13–80.0227%15 Sept
cache13–50.0314%15 Sept
dust216–13-0.0115%15 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0018%15 Sept
mirage13–80.0115%15 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0113%15 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0716%15 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0214%13 Sept
nuke12–160.0425%13 Sept
anubis13–100.1227%13 Sept
dust27–13-0.0612%8 Sept
dust213–7-0.0122%8 Sept
inferno13–40.0918%8 Sept
debris3–9-0.1221%8 Sept
vertigo8–80.0832%8 Sept
anubis13–50.0220%25 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0836%25 Aug
nuke13–20.1134%25 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0430%25 Aug
poseidon9–60.1110%25 Aug
debris9–10.0119%25 Aug
cache8–130.0116%25 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0410%24 Aug
mirage9–130.0316%23 Aug
nuke13–100.0518%23 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0211%23 Aug
nuke13–50.0513%23 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0220%22 Aug
ancient13–90.0218%20 Aug
anubis13–80.0120%20 Aug
cache13–80.0121%20 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0014%20 Aug
ancient13–90.0619%17 Aug
mirage13–20.0324%17 Aug
inferno5–13-0.114%16 Aug
nuke15–150.0028%16 Aug
anubis3–13-0.069%15 Aug
dust210–130.0018%15 Aug
debris9–4-0.0913%15 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0218%15 Aug
dust27–13-0.046%15 Aug
dust213–110.0324%14 Aug
ancient8–13-0.034%14 Aug
ancient13–50.0622%14 Aug
nuke13–7-0.028%14 Aug
train5–130.0419%14 Aug
cache13–70.1128%14 Aug
ancient13–70.0512%14 Aug
mirage13–60.058%14 Aug
train13–80.0619%14 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0125%10 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0115%9 Aug
nuke9–13-0.049%9 Aug
cache13–3-0.0115%9 Aug
dust26–13-0.0418%9 Aug
dust213–160.0614%9 Aug
poseidon8–80.1228%9 Aug
debris9–20.0413%9 Aug
ancient11–130.0410%3 Aug
dust26–13-0.0911%3 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0117%3 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0415%3 Aug
inferno13–90.0513%3 Aug
dust24–2-0.050%3 Aug
vertigo13–80.0617%3 Aug
vertigo8–130.0218%3 Aug
inferno5–130.0125%2 Aug
mirage2–3-0.0210%2 Aug
nuke13–90.1117%2 Aug
cache13–5-0.0713%2 Aug
dust213–50.0319%2 Aug
dust211–13-0.0221%2 Aug
dust25–130.0427%2 Aug
cache14–160.0215%2 Aug
cache11–30.0717%2 Aug
cache4–13-0.0217%2 Aug
ancient13–60.0315%28 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0436%28 Jul
anubis13–90.0414%28 Jul
dust210–00.017%28 Jul
inferno8–13-0.058%27 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0414%27 Jul
dust213–50.0810%27 Jul
dust214–16-0.0413%27 Jul
cache12–120.0120%27 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0112%25 Jul
cache13–70.0512%24 Jul
cache7–0-0.010%24 Jul
anubis13–10.0116%24 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0213%24 Jul
dust213–100.0425%24 Jul
inferno13–80.0314%23 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0119%23 Jul
mirage13–30.0110%23 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0416%23 Jul
mirage13–60.0923%20 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →