Catcracker — CS2 Stats

76561198067424965[U:1:107159237]

4,394Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since

8,023Hours in CS39Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.8 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating26,587Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#1460 of 21607 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,626 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

26,587Peak Premier on CSDB

2,626Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,626
Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 374 to go
Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 26,587
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,413 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-28
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	53.9%	52.8%
Shot accuracy	11.2%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.38	1.08
Match win rate	49.4%	49.2%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning71

Utility78

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–51–2Last 10047%Win rateWWLLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.3

Aggression10.0

Utility7.8

Positioning7.1

Opening Duels4.8

Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 69% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Utility. Utility score of 78 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.8° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 69% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning7.1

Utility7.8

Mechanics5.7

Opening Duels4.9

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time476ms−70ms

first ⅓ avg 546ms → last ⅓ avg 476ms

Headshot accuracy28.5%+1.6%

first ⅓ avg 27.0% → last ⅓ avg 28.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — nuke 9–2

13–1Biggest win — inferno

10Longest win streak

W2Current streak

4–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 6ancientWeakest map · 31% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	24	13–11	54%	0.00
nuke	B	20	10–10	50%	0.04
dust2	D	18	6–12	33%	-0.03
ancient	D	16	5–11	31%	0.01
cache	B	12	6–6	50%	0.06
anubis	S	6	4–2	67%	0.03
mirage	—	4	3–1	75%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

252,547Lifetime kills

1.38K/D · Top 10% of Level 10 players

8,657Matches

49.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players

53.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players

11.2%Shot accuracy

23,533MVPs

4,403Hours (in match)

15,399Bombs planted

3,394Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47115,108

M4A4 / M4A1-S41,395

AWP27,453

P2000 / USP-S12,100

Desert Eagle6,883

Glock-186,868

P2505,116

Galil AR3,718

FAMAS3,664

Knife3,457

Lifetime map wins

19,488inferno

16,385dust2

9,309nuke

2,368train

2,230vertigo

2,058cbble

177aztec

152office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,424Matches

53%Win rate

1.23Avg K/D

81.7ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	191	46%	1.18	17.5
Inferno	190	60%	1.26	16.6
Dust2	153	51%	1.14	16.6
Anubis	142	56%	1.18	16.7
Nuke	128	55%	1.29	17.0
Mirage	70	37%	1.06	15.4
Overpass	34	53%	1.22	17.3
Vertigo	24	46%	1.02	14.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.5%Headshot accuracy

33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.9%Spray accuracy

75.5%Counter-strafing

10.8°Preaim

482msReaction time

28.7%T opening success

69.5%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

14.8%Flash assists

12.04HE damage / grenade

16.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.7314% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–8	0.08	30%	28 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.00	31%	28 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.09	29%	28 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	38%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	20%	26 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.08	13%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.00	19%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.05	27%	25 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.10	29%	25 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.02	28%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.01	39%	24 Aug →
nuke	9–1	0.06	23%	24 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.06	25%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.04	31%	24 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.04	28%	23 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.18	26%	23 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	42%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.03	33%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	24%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.02	20%	22 Aug →
anubis	4–13	0.00	41%	22 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	38%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.03	40%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.10	29%	22 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.08	21%	22 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.00	22%	21 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.07	36%	21 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	30%	21 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.08	27%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.02	23%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.10	30%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.05	22%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.03	29%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.09	33%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.11	36%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.10	32%	18 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.08	19%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.08	33%	14 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	21%	14 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	21%	14 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	26%	14 Aug →
dust2	0–2	-0.20	0%	13 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	36%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.00	25%	13 Aug →
anubis	0–13	-0.06	100%	13 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.01	41%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.12	21%	13 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	32%	13 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	26%	13 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.06	19%	12 Aug →
inferno	9–4	-0.04	17%	12 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.07	19%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–16	0.05	31%	11 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	24%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.04	21%	11 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.00	33%	10 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.11	20%	10 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.07	17%	7 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.06	25%	7 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.02	20%	6 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	16%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.03	22%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	16%	5 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.04	21%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.01	25%	5 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	26%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.01	21%	4 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	30%	4 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.12	35%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.05	31%	4 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.04	32%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.07	17%	4 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	33%	31 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.04	17%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–1	0.09	21%	31 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	28%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.05	28%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.03	18%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.07	31%	30 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.00	24%	30 Jul →
nuke	9–2	0.19	44%	30 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	26%	30 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	23%	29 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.05	29%	29 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.06	19%	29 Jul →
dust2	16–12	0.01	22%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.08	26%	29 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.02	24%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.05	44%	29 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.06	26%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.08	28%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.06	34%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–16	-0.00	18%	28 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	25%	27 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.07	30%	27 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.14	17%	27 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.02	24%	27 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.02	49%	26 Jul →
ancient	1–3	-0.02	7%	26 Jul →
inferno	0–13	-0.03	31%	26 Jul →