Cobblestone KUM Stain SPLAT

Cobblestone KUM Stain SPLAT — CS2 Stats

TM76561198066772321[U:1:106506593]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

715Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
8,691Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,435 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 715 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 5 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,621 +3,643 8 May6 Jul · 13 days played
20,97825,975peak 25,9758 May6 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,435 +0 1 Sept14 Sept · 3 observations
1,4351,435peak 1,4351 Sept14 Sept
25,975Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,435Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-05-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,435
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 96 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 12 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 12 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 12 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,115), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate69.4%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy7.3%13.0%13.2%5.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.691.061.07above
Match win rate36.9%46.3%46.9%10.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCobblestone KUM Stain SPL…FACEITLevel 8 · 1,435 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,435csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning58
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54442Last 10054%Win rateLLWLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · −73ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility5.0
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.8
Utility5.0
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time563ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy24.0%+3.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 28 May
44%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · dust2, 17 May
391msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 6 Jul
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 20 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
127In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 76% over 17nukeWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A49282157%0.02
ancientS1713476%0.01
nukeD93633%0.03
cacheC83538%0.02
mirageB63350%-0.01
overpassA53260%0.05
anubis31233%0.01
inferno3030%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

188,653Lifetime kills
1.69K/D · Top 5% of Level 8 players
3,031Matches
36.9%Match win rate
69.4%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 8 players
7.3%Shot accuracy
6,752MVPs
8,691Hours (in match)
3,371Bombs planted
2,336Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4795,278
AWP10,568
SG 5536,675
P904,483
AUG3,722
P2503,003
MP72,997

Lifetime map wins

19,462dust2
1,362nuke
972inferno
220train
169vertigo
134cbble
108office
31dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

117Matches
55%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
87.3ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23954%1.2116.8
Ancient2171%1.3518.7
Inferno1747%1.3918.8
Mirage1354%1.0217.2
Nuke1060%1.4015.2
Cache1040%1.4318.9
Overpass450%1.5115.0
Anubis333%0.9212.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
86.7%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
562msReaction time
37.8%T opening success
45.0%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
8.01HE damage / grenade
9.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.8017% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache8–130.0024%25 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0027%25 Jul
dust213–100.0221%25 Jul
dust210–13-0.0227%25 Jul
mirage13–90.0123%25 Jul
dust25–130.0224%10 Jul
ancient13–110.0415%10 Jul
dust24–13-0.0530%9 Jul
ancient13–100.0420%6 Jul
dust29–130.0121%6 Jul
dust213–80.0231%3 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0418%3 Jul
dust29–130.0123%3 Jul
overpass4–13-0.0325%3 Jul
dust213–100.0822%3 Jul
ancient13–50.0116%2 Jul
cache13–70.0531%2 Jul
dust210–13-0.0133%2 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0221%2 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0323%2 Jul
dust211–130.0425%29 Jun
cache13–7-0.0229%29 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0231%26 Jun
mirage19–15-0.0022%26 Jun
anubis13–40.0418%25 Jun
dust213–60.0528%25 Jun
dust213–80.0927%25 Jun
nuke10–130.0331%25 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0014%25 Jun
dust213–110.0333%25 Jun
ancient16–140.0415%25 Jun
nuke11–130.0323%25 Jun
overpass11–130.0825%25 Jun
dust213–70.0621%24 Jun
nuke13–2-0.045%20 Jun
ancient13–110.0225%20 Jun
dust28–130.0026%12 Jun
dust216–14-0.0318%12 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0523%12 Jun
dust213–80.0628%12 Jun
dust29–13-0.0027%11 Jun
nuke13–100.0126%11 Jun
ancient13–16-0.0126%11 Jun
dust25–130.0122%11 Jun
dust213–9-0.0213%11 Jun
dust213–110.0027%11 Jun
ancient7–80.0338%6 Jun
dust28–130.0739%6 Jun
dust213–70.0624%6 Jun
dust213–60.0034%6 Jun
overpass16–140.0622%5 Jun
dust29–130.0324%5 Jun
dust213–40.0623%5 Jun
dust26–13-0.0419%4 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0322%4 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0424%4 Jun
dust215–150.0231%4 Jun
dust213–110.0635%4 Jun
ancient13–90.0215%3 Jun
ancient13–60.0222%3 Jun
dust216–140.0123%3 Jun
nuke8–10.1218%3 Jun
dust211–13-0.0226%29 May
ancient13–6-0.035%29 May
dust213–90.0224%29 May
dust213–80.1631%28 May
overpass16–140.0312%28 May
dust213–80.0229%28 May
nuke10–130.1019%28 May
cache12–120.0618%25 May
dust28–130.0423%25 May
dust213–60.0615%22 May
ancient13–80.0924%22 May
dust213–90.0227%21 May
ancient3–13-0.0424%21 May
dust25–13-0.0244%17 May
nuke8–13-0.0115%17 May
ancient16–13-0.0310%17 May
dust213–90.1120%17 May
dust210–130.0120%17 May
ancient13–90.0417%17 May
dust213–100.0421%16 May
dust28–130.0626%16 May
anubis9–13-0.0113%13 May
ancient13–70.0117%13 May
dust213–10-0.0020%8 May
dust213–80.0325%8 May
cache7–130.0224%7 May
cache13–20.1320%7 May
cache11–130.0115%7 May
dust214–16-0.0317%7 May
cache4–13-0.0832%6 May
ancient9–130.0517%6 May
nuke9–130.0214%6 May
overpass13–20.1021%6 May
dust213–50.0124%6 May
dust213–8-0.0220%6 May
dust212–160.0329%5 May
mirage8–13-0.038%5 May
dust213–110.0521%5 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →