Lounge Lizard

Lounge Lizard — CS2 Stats

DE76561198066023923[U:1:105758195]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

299Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,235Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 54 days played since 2 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,164 +2,165 12 Jan29 Mar · 7 days played
9,77212,164peak 12,16412 Jan29 Mar
12,164Peak Premier in tracked matches
54Days played since 2025-12-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,548), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate31.3%41.9%42.7%11.4% short
Shot accuracy14.9%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.840.980.990.15 short
Match win rate40.7%43.3%43.9%3.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLounge LizardFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning43
Utility15

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44488Last 10044%Win rateLLLLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · −82ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

  • 1082 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim4.8
Utility1.5
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels2.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning4.3
Utility1.5
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact8.1

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time606ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy13.4%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 12.9% → last ⅓ avg 13.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–7 · overpass, 14 Apr
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · nuke, 20 Mar
438msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · cache, 5 May
13–0Biggest win · fachwerk, 29 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L4Current streak
73In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

boulderBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB157847%-0.04
infernoC114736%-0.05
overpassA116555%-0.04
vertigoC104640%-0.03
ancientA95456%-0.03
cacheB63350%-0.04
trainD62433%-0.00
dust2D51420%-0.04
boulderS54180%-0.03
fachwerkA53260%-0.04
officeD51420%-0.03
mirage31233%-0.01
anubis31233%-0.03
stronghold21150%-0.02
warden21150%-0.06
shelter1010%-0.13
poseidon1010%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

24,286Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
1,574Matches
40.7%Match win rate
31.3%Headshot %
14.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
2,408MVPs
644Hours (in match)
2,025Bombs planted
308Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-475,342
MAC-101,525
AWP1,414
AUG1,334
MP91,210
SG 5531,181
MP71,041

Lifetime map wins

3,633inferno
3,181dust2
617nuke
417vertigo
301train
151office
62lake
43cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches
62%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.3%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
73.1%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
595msReaction time
30.3%T opening success
44.6%CT opening success
0.31Enemies flashed / flash
1.3%Flash assists
4.09HE damage / grenade
1.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.2811% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.307 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.2794% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust21–13-0.114%15 Sept
boulder3–13-0.038%15 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0215%15 Aug
fachwerk8–13-0.0516%10 Aug
fachwerk13–00.0221%29 Jul
boulder13–7-0.038%29 Jul
boulder13–7-0.0319%27 Jul
fachwerk13–10-0.0219%27 Jul
boulder13–40.0013%26 Jul
fachwerk13–10-0.1017%26 Jul
boulder13–10-0.0610%24 Jul
shelter3–13-0.1330%21 Jul
fachwerk12–12-0.0520%21 Jul
ancient12–12-0.0412%24 Jun
cache13–6-0.0111%24 Jun
cache13–6-0.0111%1 Jun
inferno2–9-0.0418%14 May
overpass0–9-0.200%14 May
nuke2–9-0.2014%14 May
inferno9–1-0.0017%14 May
cache0–7-0.1013%14 May
cache13–10-0.0618%5 May
cache8–13-0.057%5 May
cache9–13-0.0222%29 Apr
train10–13-0.0210%27 Apr
train5–130.0713%23 Apr
mirage13–20.015%22 Apr
overpass13–70.1514%14 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0218%31 Mar
nuke13–10-0.0611%29 Mar
inferno13–4-0.016%29 Mar
nuke12–12-0.098%21 Mar
dust213–30.0513%21 Mar
nuke13–110.044%20 Mar
nuke2–0-0.05100%20 Mar
nuke5–13-0.086%17 Mar
overpass13–80.028%16 Mar
vertigo3–13-0.0920%9 Mar
stronghold8–00.0410%7 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0211%5 Mar
nuke13–6-0.025%20 Feb
dust26–13-0.0623%20 Feb
ancient13–7-0.026%20 Feb
nuke0–8-0.0740%19 Feb
vertigo8–13-0.036%16 Feb
overpass13–9-0.082%12 Feb
vertigo13–7-0.104%11 Feb
vertigo4–13-0.058%11 Feb
vertigo13–80.0514%5 Feb
warden8–13-0.076%5 Feb
anubis12–12-0.017%4 Feb
stronghold7–13-0.0715%1 Feb
warden13–5-0.058%1 Feb
nuke8–130.036%31 Jan
ancient13–6-0.047%30 Jan
poseidon4–9-0.1210%30 Jan
inferno8–8-0.0711%30 Jan
nuke13–7-0.0017%19 Jan
inferno8–13-0.048%19 Jan
inferno3–9-0.169%19 Jan
overpass13–11-0.036%18 Jan
vertigo13–100.0014%15 Jan
vertigo8–130.0312%15 Jan
ancient10–13-0.083%15 Jan
overpass6–13-0.0517%15 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0618%15 Jan
ancient16–14-0.0512%14 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0510%14 Jan
overpass10–13-0.1023%13 Jan
inferno13–110.0322%13 Jan
nuke4–13-0.123%13 Jan
inferno13–2-0.1013%12 Jan
train13–11-0.0410%9 Jan
nuke13–10-0.0410%9 Jan
overpass5–13-0.0619%9 Jan
train13–8-0.0012%4 Jan
dust27–13-0.049%4 Jan
overpass5–13-0.0614%4 Jan
nuke13–60.059%30 Dec
ancient11–13-0.0219%17 Dec
vertigo12–12-0.0213%17 Dec
anubis13–9-0.017%16 Dec
train11–130.037%16 Dec
ancient13–90.0415%15 Dec
anubis8–13-0.0812%14 Dec
overpass13–6-0.044%14 Dec
dust28–13-0.0613%14 Dec
vertigo13–11-0.0410%10 Dec
ancient13–6-0.0314%10 Dec
office4–13-0.064%10 Dec
inferno12–12-0.0510%10 Dec
office4–13-0.0313%9 Dec
inferno9–13-0.0121%9 Dec
overpass13–9-0.0315%9 Dec
office12–12-0.019%8 Dec
office13–40.0312%7 Dec
vertigo4–13-0.0616%7 Dec
nuke4–130.0222%7 Dec
office8–13-0.095%7 Dec
train2–13-0.0730%2 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →