LRZ

LRZ — CS2 Stats

FI76561198062121420[U:1:101855692]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,980Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,326Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,513Top 50% of 204,219 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#60772 of 251297 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,067 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,513 -108 17 Sept – 2 Oct · 2 days played
21,51321,621peak 21,62117 Sept2 Oct
21,621Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,067Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
55Days played since 2026-03-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,067
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 433 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-14
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 108 below peak (21,621)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,487 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches48——
Win rate50%——
K/D1.09——
Headshot %47%——

Measured 14 Sep 2026 → 12 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,332), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate46.7%48.2%50.9%4.3% short
Shot accuracy14.0%13.3%13.7%meets
Kill/death ratio1.021.071.090.07 short
Match win rate45.6%46.9%48.4%2.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLRZFACEITLevel 9 · 2,067 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,513 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,067csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning52
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–54–6Last 10040%Win rateWLLLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.0pp headshot accuracy · −12ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 504ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility7.1
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.2
Utility7.1
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time523ms−54ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 523ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 12–12 · vertigo, 12 May →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · nuke, 10 Mar →
352msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · nuke, 10 Mar →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 7 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 58% over 24anubisWeakest map · 15% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2414–1058%0.02
nukeB2311–1248%0.01
anubisD132–1115%0.00
vertigoB126–650%0.04
cacheC114–736%-0.00
inferno—41–325%0.00
mirage—40–40%-0.07
dust2—31–233%0.06
overpass—30–30%-0.08
train—21–150%0.01
italy—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (15% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

119,215Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
5,450Matches
45.6%Match win rate
46.7%Headshot %
14.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
12,125MVPs
2,341Hours (in match)
4,657Bombs planted
1,743Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4737,501
AWP15,411
FAMAS3,007
Knife2,574
MAC-102,136

Lifetime map wins

12,246nuke
7,907vertigo
7,896inferno
2,391train
2,367dust2
19cbble
17lake
9safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,066Matches
51%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
76.1ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
17Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient34654%1.0515.5
Nuke29064%1.1115.6
Anubis23847%0.9914.3
Vertigo14552%0.9614.9
Inferno8144%0.9814.9
Overpass8039%1.0515.6
Mirage3938%0.8813.3
Dust23928%0.8114.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
508msReaction time
38.1%T opening success
42.4%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
10.1%Flash assists
10.35HE damage / grenade
14.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.0552% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

15% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno19–170.0214%8 Oct →
ancient11–130.0223%6 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0129%2 Oct →
cache6–130.0223%1 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.1220%30 Sept →
ancient13–90.0513%30 Sept →
cache13–30.1324%30 Sept →
anubis13–100.0443%29 Sept →
vertigo7–13-0.0018%29 Sept →
cache13–70.0221%28 Sept →
ancient8–130.0028%27 Sept →
anubis12–120.0420%17 Sept →
ancient13–30.0118%17 Sept →
mirage2–9-0.1925%16 Sept →
nuke5–130.0620%15 Sept →
nuke13–30.0525%11 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0324%7 Sept →
inferno8–130.0521%7 Sept →
anubis6–130.0314%7 Sept →
ancient7–130.0333%7 Sept →
dust213–00.1633%7 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0535%4 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0413%4 Sept →
ancient13–60.0422%3 Sept →
nuke13–70.1221%2 Sept →
dust20–30.0533%1 Sept →
ancient13–80.0235%1 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0659%31 Aug →
inferno13–16-0.0114%26 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0318%25 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0127%25 Aug →
nuke13–50.0618%24 Aug →
mirage12–16-0.0520%24 Aug →
cache10–130.0121%23 Aug →
ancient19–150.0122%22 Aug →
cache8–130.0336%21 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0528%21 Aug →
nuke13–50.0615%17 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0119%17 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0025%17 Aug →
vertigo13–80.0528%10 Aug →
ancient5–130.0125%10 Aug →
anubis5–130.0514%4 Aug →
ancient13–30.1515%16 Jul →
nuke13–50.0343%13 Jul →
cache13–40.0215%13 Jul →
anubis16–19-0.0019%8 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0522%24 Jun →
ancient13–70.0226%23 Jun →
train13–30.0621%23 Jun →
dust212–16-0.0221%8 Jun →
overpass13–16-0.0113%8 Jun →
vertigo13–40.0634%3 Jun →
ancient13–90.0522%28 May →
anubis12–12-0.0018%28 May →
nuke11–130.0314%21 May →
anubis3–13-0.0224%13 May →
vertigo12–120.2024%12 May →
nuke7–130.0319%12 May →
ancient9–13-0.0113%30 Apr →
overpass2–13-0.1323%30 Apr →
cache10–13-0.0419%29 Apr →
cache4–13-0.1210%29 Apr →
cache11–13-0.0611%29 Apr →
train5–13-0.058%28 Apr →
ancient12–120.0522%28 Apr →
anubis12–120.0225%27 Apr →
nuke1–13-0.089%27 Apr →
vertigo12–12-0.0124%27 Apr →
nuke16–13-0.0113%22 Apr →
ancient13–30.0815%22 Apr →
nuke13–80.0318%13 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0417%9 Apr →
vertigo13–40.0022%9 Apr →
anubis7–13-0.0121%9 Apr →
anubis13–9-0.0423%1 Apr →
nuke4–13-0.0413%1 Apr →
nuke13–110.0220%28 Mar →
ancient13–110.0823%26 Mar →
nuke10–130.1332%26 Mar →
vertigo13–10-0.0128%26 Mar →
anubis0–13-0.0123%23 Mar →
nuke3–13-0.0522%23 Mar →
nuke13–110.0426%23 Mar →
ancient13–70.0321%23 Mar →
nuke13–10-0.0421%20 Mar →
ancient6–130.0527%20 Mar →
ancient13–30.0828%19 Mar →
nuke13–110.0211%19 Mar →
overpass1–13-0.098%19 Mar →
vertigo9–130.0422%18 Mar →
ancient13–11-0.1019%18 Mar →
vertigo8–130.0027%13 Mar →
nuke5–13-0.089%13 Mar →
anubis11–13-0.0716%12 Mar →
italy4–10-0.0124%12 Mar →
nuke4–130.0760%10 Mar →
vertigo13–20.0325%10 Mar →
ancient7–13-0.0023%10 Mar →
vertigo9–130.0631%10 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.