๐“€˜

๐“€˜ โ€” CS2 Stats

SE76561198060570327[U:1:100304599]Steam profile โ†—โœ“ No bans

843Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,029Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,412Top 25% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPink band ยท top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#39194 of 259971 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 ยท 1,113 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,412 -80 23 Jun โ€“ 1 Nov ยท 17 days played
20,61224,245peak 24,24523 Jun1 Nov
24,245Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,113Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-06-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak โ€” 1,113
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 โ€” 88 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 ยท Level 4 ยท Level 3 ยท Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 833 below peak (24,245)
  • -833 over 30 days ยท declining
  • +174 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 โ€” 1,588 to go
  • Reached: Pink band ยท Purple band ยท Blue band ยท Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profileโ€™s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ€” those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate44.7%45.7%46.8%2.1% short
Shot accuracy13.0%12.7%13.0%meets
Kill/death ratio1.051.051.06meets
Match win rate47.7%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms โ€” not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG๐“€˜FACEITLevel 7 ยท 1,113 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER23,412 ยท Pink bandPEAK ELO1,113csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning52
Utility49

0โ€“100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55โ€“42โ€“3Last 10055%Win rateWLWLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate ยท +0.00 avg rating ยท โˆ’0.1pp headshot accuracy ยท +34ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before โ€” more than a 10-match window's normal noise (ยฑ20pp).

Last 5 ยท 10 ยท 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3โ€“2 ยท 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 10

  • 6โ€“4 ยท 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 20

  • 10โ€“8โ€“2 ยท 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample โ€” one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player โ€” Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility4.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ€” so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points โ€” deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game โ€” the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.2
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร—1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first โ…“ avg -0.01 โ†’ last โ…“ avg -0.00
Reaction time553msโˆ’31ms
first โ…“ avg 584ms โ†’ last โ…“ avg 553ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+1.5%
first โ…“ avg 20.5% โ†’ last โ…“ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating ยท 9โ€“4 ยท vertigo, 20 Aug โ†’
47%Best headshot accuracy ยท 5โ€“13 ยท inferno, 22 Sept โ†’
359msFastest reaction time ยท 0โ€“13 ยท inferno, 3 Oct โ†’
13โ€“1Biggest win ยท inferno, 28 Jul โ†’

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
15โ€“12In matches decided by โ‰ค2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map ยท 65% over 17anubisWeakest map ยท 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2513โ€“1252%0.01
nukeA2214โ€“864%-0.01
cacheS1711โ€“665%-0.01
mirageB126โ€“650%-0.03
anubisC114โ€“736%0.01
ancientB63โ€“350%0.00
vertigoโ€”32โ€“167%0.02
trainโ€”11โ€“0100%-0.01
debrisโ€”10โ€“10%-0.03
boulderโ€”10โ€“10%-0.05
dust2โ€”11โ€“0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

77,825Lifetime kills
1.05K/D ยท Top 50% of Level 7 players
4,136Matches
47.7%Match win rate ยท Top 50% of Level 7 players
44.7%Headshot %
13.0%Shot accuracy ยท Top 50% of Level 7 players
10,380MVPs
1,809Hours (in match)
4,436Bombs planted
1,159Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,895
AWP11,292
SSG 082,400
Knife1,180
P2501,139
MP91,066

Lifetime map wins

6,352inferno
3,231nuke
2,346train
2,325dust2
1,883vertigo
651cbble
495office
268lake

Lifetime totals via Steam โ€” visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

493Matches
53%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
77.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke4055%1.1014.8
Inferno3946%1.1716.6
Mirage3253%1.2715.5
Ancient2654%1.0916.4
Cache1753%0.9613.8
Anubis1118%0.9613.2
Overpass1070%1.1617.8
Train540%1.6220.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
8.2ยฐPreaim
550msReaction time
42.3%T opening success
38.4%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
8.06HE damage / grenade
5.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4495 โ€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups โ†’
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.394% โ€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games โ€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy โ†’Anubis grenade lineups โ†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13โ€“6-0.0121%2 Nov โ†’
cache5โ€“13-0.0212%1 Nov โ†’
cache13โ€“110.0213%1 Nov โ†’
nuke9โ€“130.0420%24 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“3-0.0412%24 Oct โ†’
nuke14โ€“16-0.0511%23 Oct โ†’
cache8โ€“13-0.0127%16 Oct โ†’
train13โ€“9-0.0126%12 Oct โ†’
vertigo13โ€“10-0.0215%4 Oct โ†’
inferno13โ€“100.0515%4 Oct โ†’
cache11โ€“13-0.0415%3 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“40.0914%3 Oct โ†’
cache13โ€“110.0514%3 Oct โ†’
anubis12โ€“12-0.0115%3 Oct โ†’
vertigo8โ€“8-0.1014%3 Oct โ†’
debris5โ€“9-0.0313%3 Oct โ†’
inferno0โ€“13-0.0729%3 Oct โ†’
cache13โ€“11-0.0312%3 Oct โ†’
inferno5โ€“13-0.0120%3 Oct โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.0626%3 Oct โ†’
inferno16โ€“13-0.0712%28 Sept โ†’
anubis13โ€“3-0.0444%27 Sept โ†’
cache13โ€“11-0.0033%26 Sept โ†’
inferno9โ€“130.0024%26 Sept โ†’
nuke11โ€“13-0.0333%22 Sept โ†’
inferno5โ€“13-0.0317%22 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“60.0228%22 Sept โ†’
inferno5โ€“13-0.0247%22 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“40.0422%22 Sept โ†’
cache13โ€“40.0032%21 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“50.0644%21 Sept โ†’
nuke9โ€“130.0421%21 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“90.0622%21 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“50.0235%21 Sept โ†’
cache13โ€“90.0220%21 Sept โ†’
nuke13โ€“4-0.0116%21 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“90.0213%17 Sept โ†’
anubis8โ€“130.0113%16 Sept โ†’
ancient10โ€“130.0418%16 Sept โ†’
inferno13โ€“50.0232%16 Sept โ†’
cache13โ€“9-0.0314%16 Sept โ†’
nuke10โ€“130.0215%16 Sept โ†’
mirage13โ€“11-0.0134%14 Sept โ†’
inferno7โ€“13-0.0729%2 Sept โ†’
cache13โ€“30.0618%24 Aug โ†’
anubis13โ€“50.0224%24 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“80.0521%24 Aug โ†’
cache4โ€“13-0.1121%24 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“11-0.0116%21 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“5-0.0315%21 Aug โ†’
inferno10โ€“130.0218%21 Aug โ†’
ancient15โ€“15-0.0523%20 Aug โ†’
mirage13โ€“10-0.036%20 Aug โ†’
vertigo9โ€“40.2015%20 Aug โ†’
mirage7โ€“13-0.0813%13 Aug โ†’
nuke13โ€“7-0.0322%9 Aug โ†’
ancient13โ€“11-0.0429%8 Aug โ†’
boulder11โ€“13-0.0516%8 Aug โ†’
inferno9โ€“70.1432%8 Aug โ†’
anubis8โ€“130.0211%8 Aug โ†’
ancient0โ€“11-0.0429%8 Aug โ†’
ancient16โ€“140.0425%8 Aug โ†’
cache8โ€“130.0224%8 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“80.0616%3 Aug โ†’
dust213โ€“110.0228%2 Aug โ†’
inferno12โ€“2-0.0020%2 Aug โ†’
anubis4โ€“13-0.069%2 Aug โ†’
inferno11โ€“130.0225%2 Aug โ†’
cache4โ€“13-0.0226%1 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“6-0.0413%1 Aug โ†’
inferno13โ€“70.0520%1 Aug โ†’
mirage9โ€“13-0.0745%31 Jul โ†’
nuke16โ€“12-0.0314%31 Jul โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.0614%31 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“11-0.0519%31 Jul โ†’
anubis9โ€“130.0829%30 Jul โ†’
nuke11โ€“13-0.0518%28 Jul โ†’
inferno7โ€“13-0.0011%28 Jul โ†’
inferno13โ€“10.0321%28 Jul โ†’
nuke0โ€“9-0.2011%28 Jul โ†’
ancient13โ€“40.0715%22 Jul โ†’
nuke9โ€“7-0.0320%22 Jul โ†’
nuke16โ€“140.0124%20 Jul โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.0919%20 Jul โ†’
cache13โ€“9-0.0835%20 Jul โ†’
nuke13โ€“16-0.0022%12 Jul โ†’
mirage11โ€“13-0.0123%12 Jul โ†’
mirage13โ€“110.0118%12 Jul โ†’
anubis13โ€“90.0115%12 Jul โ†’
anubis16โ€“140.0121%12 Jul โ†’
anubis14โ€“160.0427%11 Jul โ†’
mirage10โ€“13-0.0612%30 Jun โ†’
inferno7โ€“9-0.0224%27 Jun โ†’
inferno9โ€“40.1020%27 Jun โ†’
nuke13โ€“8-0.0420%25 Jun โ†’
cache16โ€“130.0315%24 Jun โ†’
inferno6โ€“13-0.0213%24 Jun โ†’
inferno11โ€“13-0.0222%24 Jun โ†’
inferno9โ€“4-0.0120%24 Jun โ†’
anubis7โ€“130.0225%23 Jun โ†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone โ†’Inventory value for this account โ†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers โ†’

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.