Bachke

Bachke — CS2 Stats

NO76561198059302801[U:1:99037073]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,834Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating23,839Top 25% of 200,629 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#32241 of 247548 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,075 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−48Premier CS Rating · 23,887 → 23,839

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,839 -1,024 30 Aug – 28 Sept · 9 days played
23,83224,999peak 24,99930 Aug28 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,075 +0 30 Aug – 13 Sept · 4 observations
2,0752,075peak 2,07530 Aug13 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,075Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
20Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,075
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 425 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,160 below peak (24,999)
  • -1,024 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,161 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBachkeFACEITLevel 10 · 2,075 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER23,839 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,075csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning64
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateLWWLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +4.8pp headshot accuracy · +0ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility7.2
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.78 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 572ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.4
Utility7.2
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time573ms+35ms
first ⅓ avg 538ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%+4.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–0 · nuke, 27 Sept →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · vertigo, 9 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · ancient, 6 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
12–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 15anubisWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA1912–763%-0.00
dust2C167–944%0.01
infernoS1510–567%-0.01
anubisD143–1121%0.01
nukeB147–750%0.01
cacheC104–640%0.01
ancientC73–443%-0.02
vertigo—42–250%0.01
train—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,292Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
78.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust231748%1.0015.1
Inferno30251%1.0315.0
Mirage25847%0.9615.2
Anubis19349%1.0415.4
Nuke17057%1.0916.0
Ancient14147%1.0215.5
Cache8754%1.1717.0
Overpass5062%1.0615.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.9%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
82.1%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
572msReaction time
41.5%T opening success
54.8%CT opening success
0.78Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
7.93HE damage / grenade
10.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache6–13-0.0426%28 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0321%28 Sept →
anubis13–50.0425%27 Sept →
dust23–130.0423%27 Sept →
nuke13–00.1322%27 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0121%26 Sept →
anubis7–130.0313%26 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0627%26 Sept →
inferno13–40.1133%26 Sept →
cache13–90.0625%26 Sept →
mirage13–60.0118%26 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0627%26 Sept →
dust28–130.0512%26 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0517%26 Sept →
nuke13–30.0715%26 Sept →
mirage13–100.0432%26 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0118%26 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0211%25 Sept →
dust211–130.0822%25 Sept →
mirage13–110.0015%25 Sept →
anubis11–130.0615%25 Sept →
nuke13–60.0826%25 Sept →
dust213–80.0322%25 Sept →
mirage13–90.0128%25 Sept →
cache13–60.0729%25 Sept →
mirage13–40.0422%24 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0119%24 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0415%24 Sept →
cache7–130.0229%24 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0131%24 Sept →
anubis16–140.0611%24 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.1133%23 Sept →
anubis12–16-0.0115%22 Sept →
mirage13–90.0220%22 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0116%22 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0024%22 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0118%22 Sept →
inferno13–110.0321%22 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0320%22 Sept →
mirage3–130.0128%18 Sept →
train13–8-0.0233%18 Sept →
nuke13–100.0820%18 Sept →
dust213–50.0420%17 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0723%17 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0418%17 Sept →
dust213–30.0028%17 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0119%15 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0119%15 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.020%15 Sept →
mirage13–90.0022%15 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0112%15 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0031%14 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0228%14 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0225%14 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0325%13 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0219%13 Sept →
nuke13–90.0522%13 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0611%9 Sept →
anubis13–20.0821%9 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0027%9 Sept →
anubis10–130.0429%9 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0326%9 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.0336%9 Sept →
inferno13–110.0123%9 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.127%8 Sept →
vertigo13–100.0214%8 Sept →
nuke9–130.019%8 Sept →
anubis10–130.0318%8 Sept →
cache11–130.0011%8 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0120%8 Sept →
cache5–130.0119%8 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.048%8 Sept →
vertigo13–100.0118%8 Sept →
dust27–13-0.1210%8 Sept →
dust213–110.0111%7 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0331%7 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0420%7 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0226%7 Sept →
dust28–130.0524%6 Sept →
nuke13–110.0721%6 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0210%6 Sept →
dust213–110.0417%5 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0215%5 Sept →
inferno13–60.0016%5 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0420%5 Sept →
mirage13–70.0214%3 Sept →
vertigo10–130.0418%3 Sept →
dust213–80.0627%3 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0515%3 Sept →
mirage19–170.0322%3 Sept →
cache13–20.0312%3 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0612%3 Sept →
nuke2–130.0133%3 Sept →
inferno5–4-0.035%3 Sept →
inferno7–130.0124%1 Sept →
cache22–190.0413%1 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0322%1 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0121%1 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0110%31 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.075%31 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.