Willtord (っ˘з(˘⌣˘ ) — CS2 Stats

76561198058236953[U:1:97971225]✓ No bans

2,218Tracked matches24%Win rate2020Tracked since

6,602Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,731Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#17170 of 49869 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	39.6%	42.7%	44.0%	4.4% short
Shot accuracy	13.7%	10.8%	11.6%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.12	1.00	1.03	above
Match win rate	60.5%	44.1%	45.1%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66

Positioning45

Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD35–58–7Last 10035%Win rateLLTLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6

Aggression4.3

Utility4.3

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels0.5

Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6

Positioning4.5

Utility4.3

Mechanics6.0

Opening Duels1.8

Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time588ms−41ms

first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms

Headshot accuracy14.7%+0.4%

first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — office 13–1

13–1Biggest win — office

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

4–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
office	C	44	17–27	39%	0.05
cache	D	11	3–8	27%	0.02
inferno	D	9	3–6	33%	0.02
nuke	C	7	3–4	43%	0.01
dust2	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.03
ancient	S	6	4–2	67%	0.03
vertigo	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.01
mirage	—	3	1–2	33%	0.02
anubis	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.01
fachwerk	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.00
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	0.13
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.12
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.04
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

185,856Lifetime kills

1.12K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players

14,609Matches

60.5%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 4 players

39.6%Headshot %

13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players

23,591MVPs

3,846Hours (in match)

9,854Bombs planted

1,578Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

SG 55327,561

Desert Eagle23,201

M4A4 / M4A1-S22,367

AK-4722,232

AUG12,468

P2000 / USP-S8,624

Glock-186,795

P2506,437

UMP-456,097

Negev6,026

Lifetime map wins

15,278dust2

9,857inferno

6,863nuke

5,635office

4,748train

2,814vertigo

1,951cbble

899italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

47Matches

53%Win rate

1.03Avg K/D

81.1ADR

36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

18%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	3	100%	0.99	14.0
Mirage	3	33%	0.67	10.0
Dust2	2	50%	0.83	14.0
Vertigo	1	0%	1.00	19.0
Nuke	1	100%	1.00	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.6%Headshot accuracy

34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.5%Spray accuracy

76.9%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

581msReaction time

20.2%T opening success

44.0%CT opening success

0.35Enemies flashed / flash

5.9%Flash assists

9.34HE damage / grenade

4.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.5809% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3522 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 20.1638% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
office	6–13	0.03	24%	29 Aug →
office	7–13	0.12	12%	29 Aug →
office	12–12	0.02	15%	26 Aug →
office	8–13	0.02	7%	23 Aug →
cache	3–13	0.05	11%	23 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.04	14%	23 Aug →
office	13–5	0.00	35%	23 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.04	17%	21 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	3%	21 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.02	12%	15 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.01	16%	15 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.01	22%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.01	13%	14 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.05	19%	14 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.10	17%	14 Aug →
cache	13–16	0.02	10%	12 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.07	13%	12 Aug →
office	5–13	0.10	16%	12 Aug →
office	11–13	0.08	12%	12 Aug →
cache	13–3	-0.02	22%	11 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.01	14%	11 Aug →
office	11–13	-0.03	10%	11 Aug →
office	13–9	0.02	11%	10 Aug →
office	10–13	0.02	9%	10 Aug →
office	9–13	0.00	11%	10 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.06	9%	9 Aug →
boulder	3–6	0.13	16%	6 Aug →
fachwerk	13–11	0.04	7%	6 Aug →
shelter	8–13	-0.12	33%	6 Aug →
vertigo	13–4	0.03	13%	6 Aug →
office	12–12	0.05	16%	6 Aug →
office	6–13	-0.01	12%	6 Aug →
office	13–8	0.08	11%	6 Aug →
office	13–9	0.17	9%	5 Aug →
office	10–13	-0.01	9%	5 Aug →
office	13–10	0.05	15%	5 Aug →
office	12–12	0.01	11%	4 Aug →
office	8–13	0.04	16%	4 Aug →
vertigo	7–9	0.08	9%	3 Aug →
vertigo	8–13	-0.06	13%	3 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.03	9%	3 Aug →
inferno	12–12	0.09	20%	3 Aug →
office	2–13	-0.04	8%	2 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.01	10%	2 Aug →
office	13–9	0.07	14%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.02	19%	1 Aug →
office	13–9	0.17	9%	31 Jul →
office	13–3	0.01	7%	31 Jul →
office	7–13	0.01	13%	31 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.04	9%	29 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	0.04	14%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.04	13%	29 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.02	11%	29 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.03	24%	29 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	29%	27 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.06	13%	26 Jul →
office	13–4	0.08	15%	26 Jul →
office	4–13	0.05	11%	26 Jul →
train	13–8	0.04	15%	26 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.01	14%	26 Jul →
office	13–6	-0.04	16%	26 Jul →
office	10–13	0.10	14%	26 Jul →
fachwerk	6–13	-0.04	9%	23 Jul →
office	13–9	0.17	9%	23 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.01	12%	21 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.02	17%	21 Jul →
office	8–13	0.04	20%	21 Jul →
cache	3–13	0.01	11%	20 Jul →
office	9–13	0.09	10%	20 Jul →
office	13–8	0.18	10%	20 Jul →
office	13–1	0.19	18%	20 Jul →
office	5–13	0.06	13%	20 Jul →
office	3–13	-0.05	17%	19 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.02	13%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.03	10%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.06	15%	18 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	2%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.06	17%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.05	10%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.06	20%	17 Jul →
office	13–9	0.03	27%	16 Jul →
office	13–9	0.08	22%	16 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.06	26%	16 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.08	13%	16 Jul →
office	4–13	0.00	21%	14 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.11	22%	13 Jul →
office	8–13	0.06	12%	13 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.03	6%	12 Jul →
office	12–12	0.16	16%	10 Jul →
office	10–13	0.05	17%	10 Jul →
office	11–13	0.02	26%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.00	6%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.05	18%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	8%	9 Jul →
anubis	15–15	-0.03	8%	9 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	10%	9 Jul →
office	13–11	-0.05	10%	9 Jul →
office	13–5	0.07	9%	8 Jul →
vertigo	4–9	-0.12	6%	8 Jul →
poseidon	7–9	-0.04	25%	8 Jul →