♿-Peek NAHKASAAPAS — CS2 Stats

76561198084908499[U:1:124642771]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,794Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating2.7 LearningSupport

Premier CS Rating3,640Grey band · top ~84.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#206482 of 259884 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 3,640 +1,176 1 Sept – 31 Oct · 18 days played

4,529Peak Premier in tracked matches

26Days played since 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

555 below peak (4,195)
+615 over 30 days · improving
Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 — 1,360 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim22

Positioning50

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY34–63–3Last 10034%Win rateLLLWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.1pp headshot accuracy · +14ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–4 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.05
Avg headshot accuracy 10%
Avg reaction 639ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 17%
Avg reaction 680ms

Last 20

7–13 · 35% win rate
Avg rating -0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 673ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim2.2

Utility5.0

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels0.6

Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like iM 55% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 668ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 59% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.2

Positioning5.0

Utility5.0

Mechanics1.9

Opening Duels2.9

Win Impact0.0

Composite 2.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time667ms+51ms

first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 667ms

Headshot accuracy16.7%−6.7%

first ⅓ avg 23.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 13–3 · office, 31 Oct →

63%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · dust2, 27 Sept →

375msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · overpass, 3 Oct →

13–0Biggest win · office, 18 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak

L3Current streak

5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 44% over 9nukeWeakest map · 25% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
office	C	56	21–35	38%	-0.03
nuke	D	12	3–9	25%	-0.04
cache	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.06
dust2	D	8	2–6	25%	-0.06
mirage	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.07
inferno	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.05
anubis	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.12
train	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.03
ancient	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.10
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.07
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

52Matches

42%Win rate

0.75Avg K/D

97.6ADR

37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	13	46%	0.85	11.7
Nuke	8	62%	1.04	11.6
Vertigo	8	12%	0.55	8.4
Inferno	7	29%	0.62	11.1
Overpass	5	60%	0.92	11.8
Ancient	4	25%	0.61	8.3
Mirage	3	67%	0.74	13.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy

32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.5%Spray accuracy

58.7%Counter-strafing

14.4°Preaim

668msReaction time

46.2%T opening success

37.0%CT opening success

0.45Enemies flashed / flash

8.4%Flash assists

8.56HE damage / grenade

9.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.
Preaim 14.3904° — above the 12° mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4478 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	11–13	-0.11	10%	31 Oct →
office	4–13	-0.04	14%	31 Oct →
nuke	14–16	-0.04	14%	31 Oct →
office	13–9	-0.05	14%	31 Oct →
office	6–13	-0.02	0%	31 Oct →
office	13–3	0.08	50%	31 Oct →
office	11–13	-0.04	18%	31 Oct →
vertigo	13–4	-0.07	14%	30 Oct →
train	13–8	0.01	24%	30 Oct →
nuke	7–13	-0.08	8%	30 Oct →
cache	13–5	-0.04	10%	30 Oct →
office	8–13	-0.08	20%	30 Oct →
office	13–9	-0.08	11%	25 Oct →
office	10–13	-0.00	15%	25 Oct →
office	8–13	-0.01	14%	25 Oct →
office	6–13	-0.08	0%	24 Oct →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	13%	24 Oct →
mirage	7–13	0.01	15%	24 Oct →
nuke	0–13	-0.08	16%	24 Oct →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	11%	24 Oct →
office	3–13	-0.04	20%	24 Oct →
office	13–10	-0.01	30%	24 Oct →
office	7–13	-0.05	25%	24 Oct →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	13%	24 Oct →
office	10–13	-0.07	24%	23 Oct →
office	3–8	-0.04	30%	23 Oct →
office	9–13	-0.03	14%	20 Oct →
office	11–13	-0.05	5%	18 Oct →
office	13–2	0.03	36%	18 Oct →
office	13–4	0.04	0%	18 Oct →
office	13–0	0.04	20%	18 Oct →
anubis	8–13	-0.11	17%	17 Oct →
dust2	5–13	0.02	25%	17 Oct →
office	4–13	0.02	0%	17 Oct →
office	13–4	-0.04	17%	17 Oct →
anubis	8–13	-0.13	17%	17 Oct →
nuke	16–13	-0.08	21%	17 Oct →
office	7–13	-0.07	11%	16 Oct →
cache	13–3	-0.10	25%	16 Oct →
inferno	16–12	-0.08	5%	16 Oct →
cache	13–11	-0.03	13%	16 Oct →
office	9–13	-0.03	22%	16 Oct →
office	11–13	-0.03	17%	16 Oct →
office	13–3	0.03	38%	16 Oct →
office	13–9	0.06	0%	16 Oct →
office	8–13	-0.08	0%	15 Oct →
office	13–6	-0.00	19%	15 Oct →
office	13–9	0.03	40%	15 Oct →
office	13–4	-0.09	0%	15 Oct →
dust2	16–14	-0.06	12%	15 Oct →
dust2	5–13	-0.09	43%	14 Oct →
office	7–13	-0.04	60%	14 Oct →
office	13–9	-0.05	13%	14 Oct →
office	8–13	0.01	50%	12 Oct →
cache	6–13	-0.03	18%	10 Oct →
dust2	16–13	-0.10	12%	10 Oct →
nuke	1–13	-0.07	22%	10 Oct →
office	8–13	0.00	17%	10 Oct →
office	12–12	-0.07	0%	10 Oct →
office	7–13	-0.05	7%	10 Oct →
office	9–13	-0.05	11%	10 Oct →
office	11–6	-0.08	12%	10 Oct →
office	5–13	-0.04	60%	10 Oct →
inferno	2–13	-0.04	15%	9 Oct →
office	4–13	0.02	0%	9 Oct →
anubis	8–13	-0.11	19%	8 Oct →
ancient	10–13	-0.11	25%	8 Oct →
office	10–13	-0.03	50%	8 Oct →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	15%	8 Oct →
office	13–11	-0.05	18%	7 Oct →
nuke	11–13	0.04	20%	7 Oct →
office	13–10	-0.10	0%	6 Oct →
office	13–4	-0.08	20%	6 Oct →
nuke	16–13	0.02	20%	5 Oct →
office	10–13	-0.05	40%	4 Oct →
overpass	2–13	-0.12	22%	3 Oct →
cache	7–13	-0.08	17%	3 Oct →
cache	13–10	-0.03	9%	3 Oct →
cache	6–13	-0.10	13%	3 Oct →
office	8–13	-0.04	50%	3 Oct →
office	12–12	-0.08	0%	3 Oct →
office	7–13	-0.08	50%	3 Oct →
office	9–13	-0.05	24%	3 Oct →
train	11–13	-0.07	44%	30 Sept →
office	13–10	-0.01	12%	30 Sept →
nuke	9–13	-0.08	0%	29 Sept →
office	9–13	-0.03	25%	29 Sept →
office	3–13	-0.03	0%	28 Sept →
cache	9–13	-0.00	24%	27 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	63%	27 Sept →
ancient	5–13	-0.09	11%	26 Sept →
cache	12–16	-0.11	22%	26 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.13	14%	26 Sept →
office	11–13	-0.08	29%	26 Sept →
office	13–8	-0.01	43%	26 Sept →
office	13–2	0.01	20%	26 Sept →
dust2	9–13	-0.12	10%	26 Sept →
dust2	15–15	-0.05	24%	25 Sept →
nuke	16–14	-0.06	25%	25 Sept →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	40%	25 Sept →