못 TheAntz◢◤

못 TheAntz◢◤ — CS2 Stats

76561198057415737[U:1:97150009]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,021Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,328Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (40 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+22Tracked matches · now 1,021
+17.1ppWin rate · 31.0% → 48.1%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,560 -321 11 Apr – 6 Jul · 9 days played
18,52719,999peak 19,99911 Apr6 Jul
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
39Days played since 2026-04-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches16——
Win rate50%——
K/D0.78——
Headshot %41%——

Measured 11 Sep 2026 → 16 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,195), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate46.6%45.7%46.8%meets
Shot accuracy9.5%12.7%13.0%3.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.071.051.06meets
Match win rate34.4%45.7%46.3%11.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG못 TheAntz◢◤FACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51
Positioning51
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–51–6Last 10043%Win rateLTLLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −4.6pp headshot accuracy · −42ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 20

  • 9–8–3 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim5.1
Utility6.7
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1
Positioning5.1
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time580ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 26 Apr →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · ancient, 6 Sept →
453msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · ancient, 14 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 26 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
12–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 59% over 17mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC269–1735%-0.00
cacheC198–1142%-0.02
anubisA1710–759%-0.00
nukeC167–944%0.01
dust2B63–350%0.00
infernoD62–433%-0.02
mirageD51–420%-0.01
vertigo—31–233%-0.02
overpass—22–0100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

63,376Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
4,225Matches
34.4%Match win rate
46.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
9.5%Shot accuracy
6,685MVPs
3,549Hours (in match)
3,170Bombs planted
989Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,291nuke
3,932inferno
2,164dust2
895vertigo
888train
175cbble
61militia
59office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

166Matches
55%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
75.5ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis4356%1.0714.9
Ancient3557%1.1515.9
Nuke2857%1.2815.5
Inferno1450%0.8813.0
Cache1464%0.9215.4
Vertigo1050%1.3219.9
Mirage944%0.9715.2
Overpass475%1.8219.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
29.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.7%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
580msReaction time
30.4%T opening success
39.2%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
10.54HE damage / grenade
11.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.3514% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient5–13-0.0325%14 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0322%14 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.044%10 Oct →
vertigo5–13-0.0517%1 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0514%1 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.027%1 Oct →
inferno2–130.0131%29 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0613%29 Sept →
anubis13–110.0011%29 Sept →
dust26–13-0.068%29 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0423%29 Sept →
vertigo13–40.007%29 Sept →
ancient12–120.0126%6 Sept →
vertigo12–12-0.0217%6 Sept →
overpass13–8-0.0416%6 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0816%6 Sept →
anubis19–17-0.0216%6 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0039%6 Sept →
nuke13–30.0316%6 Sept →
anubis9–130.0123%6 Sept →
nuke13–110.0119%4 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0321%4 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0210%4 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0319%4 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0221%1 Sept →
anubis13–80.0511%1 Sept →
ancient4–130.0116%1 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.029%31 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0326%31 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.068%30 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0215%26 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0725%24 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0819%24 Aug →
cache8–130.0025%24 Aug →
ancient4–100.0928%24 Aug →
mirage8–130.0327%24 Aug →
dust213–50.0121%23 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0425%23 Aug →
mirage9–130.0326%23 Aug →
ancient13–100.0213%23 Aug →
cache1–13-0.106%23 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0315%20 Aug →
dust23–130.0526%20 Aug →
nuke11–130.0019%7 Aug →
ancient13–70.0317%22 Jul →
nuke10–130.0120%22 Jul →
ancient13–100.0111%9 Jul →
cache0–13-0.125%9 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0514%8 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0315%6 Jul →
cache10–13-0.0215%6 Jul →
ancient13–30.0319%6 Jul →
ancient14–160.0018%6 Jul →
nuke14–160.0716%6 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0522%29 Jun →
anubis10–130.0213%22 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.037%22 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.0113%15 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0512%15 Jun →
ancient8–13-0.0114%3 Jun →
nuke7–130.0216%3 Jun →
nuke13–30.1020%3 Jun →
anubis13–100.038%3 Jun →
ancient8–130.038%2 Jun →
nuke6–13-0.0418%2 Jun →
nuke3–13-0.0315%1 Jun →
inferno13–40.0625%1 Jun →
cache2–13-0.0415%17 May →
ancient16–140.0010%14 May →
cache16–140.0923%14 May →
ancient13–8-0.0016%12 May →
cache11–13-0.0814%12 May →
cache6–13-0.0322%12 May →
cache11–13-0.0113%6 May →
anubis19–22-0.039%5 May →
cache13–9-0.0118%4 May →
cache12–12-0.0418%4 May →
cache19–160.0418%4 May →
overpass13–80.0417%2 May →
nuke13–80.0322%2 May →
cache13–60.0113%2 May →
cache13–8-0.0222%2 May →
cache12–120.0518%2 May →
anubis13–80.038%26 Apr →
nuke13–20.1416%26 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.018%26 Apr →
ancient13–60.0215%26 Apr →
ancient11–130.0516%25 Apr →
nuke9–13-0.0512%25 Apr →
ancient10–130.0313%18 Apr →
anubis13–11-0.027%18 Apr →
inferno16–12-0.0414%17 Apr →
anubis9–13-0.059%14 Apr →
anubis16–140.0618%13 Apr →
ancient13–110.0219%13 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0611%12 Apr →
dust213–30.0529%12 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0022%12 Apr →
dust213–80.0015%11 Apr →
anubis13–100.0112%11 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.